<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And you thought forecasts were tricky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9692/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9692</link>
	<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly fail to disagree with you less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:23:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: QA Hates You &#187; Blog Archive &#187; That Won&#8217;t Play Well In England</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9692/comment-page-1#comment-26685</link>
		<dc:creator>QA Hates You &#187; Blog Archive &#187; That Won&#8217;t Play Well In England</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9692#comment-26685</guid>
		<description>[...] Dustbury notes an error in a footer: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dustbury notes an error in a footer: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Pergiel</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9692/comment-page-1#comment-26679</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Pergiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 05:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9692#comment-26679</guid>
		<description>Silver Spring MARYLAND? Well, that&#039;s your problem right there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silver Spring MARYLAND? Well, that&#8217;s your problem right there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian J.</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9692/comment-page-1#comment-26678</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 03:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9692#comment-26678</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t believe them, Charles.  They&#039;re with the conspiracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t believe them, Charles.  They&#8217;re with the conspiracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9692/comment-page-1#comment-26675</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9692#comment-26675</guid>
		<description>This would make a certain amount of sense.

Not all the local pages have this issue, so it may simply be a question of the last time the page, as distinguished from the content, was rebuilt; the Forecast Discussion, where I first found the problem, is pretty static &#151; they just keep pushing new versions to the top and old ones fall off after a couple of days.  Other pages that might require the occasional reformat do not so suffer.

And I suppose hiding the error message down there where only the geeks will find it is probably a Good Thing in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would make a certain amount of sense.</p>
<p>Not all the local pages have this issue, so it may simply be a question of the last time the page, as distinguished from the content, was rebuilt; the Forecast Discussion, where I first found the problem, is pretty static &#8212; they just keep pushing new versions to the top and old ones fall off after a couple of days.  Other pages that might require the occasional reformat do not so suffer.</p>
<p>And I suppose hiding the error message down there where only the geeks will find it is probably a Good Thing in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9692/comment-page-1#comment-26672</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9692#comment-26672</guid>
		<description>If you go &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.srh.noaa.gov/oun/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; it shows the correct address, along with a webmaster&#039;s e-mail link that works; the Internet Services Team e-mail link contains no address.

I suspect the server at forecast.weather.gov is actually located at NWSHQ, but that the CMS that generates forecast pages looks for a code tag that tells it what actual address to display.

Since the same message appears on the page for the Atlanta forecast discussion, I&#039;d say the problem is on the server in Silver Spring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you go <a href="http://www.srh.noaa.gov/oun/" rel="nofollow">here</a> it shows the correct address, along with a webmaster&#8217;s e-mail link that works; the Internet Services Team e-mail link contains no address.</p>
<p>I suspect the server at forecast.weather.gov is actually located at NWSHQ, but that the CMS that generates forecast pages looks for a code tag that tells it what actual address to display.</p>
<p>Since the same message appears on the page for the Atlanta forecast discussion, I&#8217;d say the problem is on the server in Silver Spring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fillyjonk</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9692/comment-page-1#comment-26671</link>
		<dc:creator>fillyjonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9692#comment-26671</guid>
		<description>My campus&#039; webmail has apparently had their security certificate expire and no one&#039;s noticed (I THINK offices were open a couple days last week); when I try to log in I get a warning message that it&#039;s not &quot;trusted content&quot; or some such.

I figure it&#039;s unlikely I&#039;d get malware from my campus webmail. And if I do, I know the person to go and hassle about it. But it is kind of embarrassing for an organization to have mess-ups of that sort (though certainly more for the NWS, who are supposed to know about things like geography.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My campus&#8217; webmail has apparently had their security certificate expire and no one&#8217;s noticed (I THINK offices were open a couple days last week); when I try to log in I get a warning message that it&#8217;s not &#8220;trusted content&#8221; or some such.</p>
<p>I figure it&#8217;s unlikely I&#8217;d get malware from my campus webmail. And if I do, I know the person to go and hassle about it. But it is kind of embarrassing for an organization to have mess-ups of that sort (though certainly more for the NWS, who are supposed to know about things like geography.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

