Comments on: That new electronic-sign ordinance http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9728 I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:23:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: CGHill http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9728/comment-page-1#comment-26888 CGHill Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:20:11 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9728#comment-26888 There is one under reconstruction: <a href="http://www.legendsofamerica.com/photos-oklahoma/TowerTheatreOklahomaCity-500.jpg" rel="nofollow">the Tower</a>, along the new 23rd streetscape. I don't think it would be affected under this rule, if they stick to the original marquee size. There is one under reconstruction: the Tower, along the new 23rd streetscape. I don’t think it would be affected under this rule, if they stick to the original marquee size.

]]> By: Old Grouch http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9728/comment-page-1#comment-26887 Old Grouch Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:52:47 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9728#comment-26887 <em>a ban in areas where design review is required</em> Wonder how that would affect a <a href="http://www.wagnersign.com/images/stories/morris2.jpg" rel="nofollow">theater restoration project</a> (Morris Performing Arts Center, South Bend, IN... yes, the front and side panels are electronic.)? (Or are there no theaters in OKC left to restore?) a ban in areas where design review is required

Wonder how that would affect a theater restoration project (Morris Performing Arts Center, South Bend, IN… yes, the front and side panels are electronic.)? (Or are there no theaters in OKC left to restore?)

]]>