Comments on: All around the world http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9794 I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:36:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: fillyjonk http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9794/comment-page-1#comment-27066 fillyjonk Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:19:40 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9794#comment-27066 I've also heard claims that John in the Last Supper was actually supposed to be Mary Magdalene. (Though that may have just been Dan Brown claiming that, to gin up book sales) Da Vinci, gender bender extraordinaire. I’ve also heard claims that John in the Last Supper was actually supposed to be Mary Magdalene. (Though that may have just been Dan Brown claiming that, to gin up book sales)

Da Vinci, gender bender extraordinaire.

]]> By: CGHill http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9794/comment-page-1#comment-27064 CGHill Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:31:21 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9794#comment-27064 Well, if any 16th-century genius could have captured the magic that is Nat King Cole, it would have to have been Leonardo, right? Well, if any 16th-century genius could have captured the magic that is Nat King Cole, it would have to have been Leonardo, right?

]]> By: Lisa Paul http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9794/comment-page-1#comment-27063 Lisa Paul Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:53:54 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9794#comment-27063 I always thought the Mona Lisa was a disguised portrait of Nat King Cole. I always thought the Mona Lisa was a disguised portrait of Nat King Cole.

]]>