<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Write now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9871/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9871</link>
	<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly fail to disagree with you less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:23:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9871/comment-page-1#comment-27304</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9871#comment-27304</guid>
		<description>As a creative-writing program drop-out, I chuckle at the cavalier disregard for the odds against these bushy-tailed scribes. And I&#039;ll invoke the best advice I&#039;ve heard regarding those odds:

&quot;You’ll write a million words before you publish your first thousand.&quot; - Donn &quot;Cool Hand Luke&quot; Pearce

Despite the Online Age&#039;s more flexible definition of &quot;publish&quot; (and, for that matter, &quot;write&quot;), I think this still holds true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a creative-writing program drop-out, I chuckle at the cavalier disregard for the odds against these bushy-tailed scribes. And I&#8217;ll invoke the best advice I&#8217;ve heard regarding those odds:</p>
<p>&#8220;You’ll write a million words before you publish your first thousand.&#8221; &#8211; Donn &#8220;Cool Hand Luke&#8221; Pearce</p>
<p>Despite the Online Age&#8217;s more flexible definition of &#8220;publish&#8221; (and, for that matter, &#8220;write&#8221;), I think this still holds true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9871/comment-page-1#comment-27298</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9871#comment-27298</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;(unless you’re using spaceships and explosions as metaphors for existentialist angst or somesuch nonsense)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Who says that had to be the idea when you wrote it? A truly (ahem) &lt;i&gt;creative&lt;/i&gt; creative-writing student can convince a professor the plot elements mean whatever the professor likes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>(unless you’re using spaceships and explosions as metaphors for existentialist angst or somesuch nonsense)</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Who says that had to be the idea when you wrote it? A truly (ahem) <i>creative</i> creative-writing student can convince a professor the plot elements mean whatever the professor likes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sya</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9871/comment-page-1#comment-27297</link>
		<dc:creator>sya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9871#comment-27297</guid>
		<description>Well, since most creative writing programs look down on genre fiction anyway (unless you&#039;re using spaceships and explosions as metaphors for existentialist angst or somesuch nonsense), they would be pointless for anyone trying their hand at non-literary fiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, since most creative writing programs look down on genre fiction anyway (unless you&#8217;re using spaceships and explosions as metaphors for existentialist angst or somesuch nonsense), they would be pointless for anyone trying their hand at non-literary fiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fillyjonk</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9871/comment-page-1#comment-27296</link>
		<dc:creator>fillyjonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9871#comment-27296</guid>
		<description>Hmm. The Career as Big Lottery Win model. 

I suspect that a lot of the instant-success types wind up about as happy as the stereotypical lottery winner. Which is to say, after the initial excitement has worn off, not very.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. The Career as Big Lottery Win model. </p>
<p>I suspect that a lot of the instant-success types wind up about as happy as the stereotypical lottery winner. Which is to say, after the initial excitement has worn off, not very.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

