Hold that wrecking ball
Earlier this month, I grumbled about the New! Improved! SandRidge Energy complex:
[I]t strikes me as a bad idea aesthetically to remove the [Kermac] building simply to increase the visibility of the new SandRidge plaza.
Well, would you look at that. The Downtown Design Review Committee sees things much the same way I do [pdf]:
The loss of buildings that may have economic viability in exchange for open space would erode the urban density of the downtown moving it close to a suburban character. While open space has value in a downtown environment, the extent of the proposed plazas, decks, and landscaping again reflects a more suburban scale and does not appear to be based on any studies indicating the need for such.
Downtowns are defined by the presence of high-rise buildings. To eliminate five structures that represent true urban character and that define what constitutes a “downtown” — buildings, massing, and definition of the street edge is counter-productive to the intent and purpose of downtown development and other recent proposed redevelopment efforts in the downtown core. Replacement of just one building [albeit an attractive one] does not adequately mitigate this substantial loss of urban fabric.
The staff recommends denial of all but one of the proposed demolitions.
Which doesn’t kill the plan outright, but does create at least the possibility of sending it back to the drawing board.
If they really want a wide-open plaza, let them put it up somewhere in Core to Shore.



