4 June 2007A truly FCCed policyNews Item: A federal appeals court on Monday found that a new Federal Communications Commission policy penalizing accidentally aired expletives was invalid, saying it was "arbitrary and capricious" and might not survive First Amendment scrutiny. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals did not, however, outlaw the policy outright. In a 2-1 ruling, it found in favor of a Fox Television-led challenge to the policy and returned the case to the FCC to let the agency try to provide a "reasoned analysis" for its new approach to indecency and profanity. It added it was doubtful the FCC could do so. Top Ten talking points in the FCC's "reasoned analysis" for its new approach to indecency and profanity:
(Via that pesky Jeff Jarvis.) Addendum: Text of the decision here. (Via Justin Levine.) Posted at 7:24 PM to Listing to One SideAs I recollect, the cutoff for the F-word (bleeped at the link) was supposed to be that if the connotation was sexual it was banned, but otherwise it wasn't actionable. I'm remembering the content of the linked post as mine, but I can't verify that because that post links to a post by Dodd that appears to have vanished. So I don't know which of us gets the credit. Posted by: McGehee at 7:39 PM on 4 June 2007What, no love for Peter Griffin's take on the freakin' FCC? (And Jarvis isn't so much pesky as pedestrian.) Posted by: Mister Snitch! at 10:10 PM on 4 June 2007"If the satellite-radio merger fails we may get Howard Stern back." I wish. I think he's gone for go though. He has too much interest in satellite. Posted by: AC Sportsbooks at 8:05 PM on 7 June 2007 |