11 June 2007To everything there is a seasonAttila Girl contemplates the toeless hose I brought up yesterday, and she doesn't buy the premise:
Look: stockings are one thing, and are fine between consenting adults. But panty hose of any type are not sexy. They are meant for one purpose, and one purpose only: to attenuate one's lack of tan/unevenness of skin tone.
If the environment you are going into is so casual that you can wave your bare toes around, you have no business [wearing] panty hose of any sort. Or, if the environment requires panty hose, you shouldn't be showing off your lovely pedicure. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, I suspect, understands this premise: the wire services have carried zillions of photos of her in shortish but not too shortish dresses, but you never, ever see her in sandals. Nor is this a Republican phenomenon; for all I know, Nancy Pelosi may knock around in Birkenstocks at home, but in her capacity as Speaker, she's conservatively shod. Posted at 2:08 PM to Rag TradePantyhose also serve to keep the wobbly parts from wobbling. Posted by: Venomous Kate at 5:43 PM on 11 June 2007I'll, um, take your word for it. (The scary phrase "control top" just popped into my head.) Posted by: CGHill at 6:33 PM on 11 June 2007Could Condi have camel toes per chance ? :) Posted by: Paul at 12:04 PM on 12 June 2007I think pantyhose are sexy and I get alot of attention from the men when I wear pantyhose which makes me feel sexy. If you are 200 + lbs then maybe you are not attractive whether you wear pantyhose or not.... Posted by: Shannon at 12:54 AM on 18 June 2007 |