23 August 2007Where's my electrical tape?Nissan will be adding a fuel-economy gauge to all its US models over the next couple of model years. I've already seen it, and I am not impressed:
[O]ne of the fifty bazillion display settings has caused an annoying MPG meter to be parked right in the center of the gauge cluster, a big red bar graph that spends a lot of time at 0 mpg, mostly because traffic isn't moving at that exact moment. I suppose this is intended to make people aware of their fuel consumption, but believe me, every time I fill a gas tank (fifteen times this month), I am acutely aware of how much I'm using. This might be more useful were it set for something other than instantaneous fuel economy, which, after all, is rather transient. (It's maybe 6 mpg during half-throttle acceleration in first gear, but this condition seldom lasts more than a couple of seconds, inasmuch as the car can reach 60 mph in less than six seconds, during which time it's upshifted to second.)
In a vehicle designed for maximum fuel economy as the primary goal your Priuses (I refuse to say "Prii") and such this sort of gizmo might be fun to play with. (And with the engine stopped at traffic lights, you're dividing by zero, so MPG is undefined at that point: it should be literally off the scale.) In a sports sedan, it's just one more distraction. But Nissan really believes in these things:
Based on Nissan's trials, drivers have tended to improve their eco-driving habits over time, prompted by the real-time fuel-efficiency readings. Driving improvements also included smoother acceleration and braking, which potentially could lead to an average 10% improvement in fuel-efficiency.
Inasmuch as I'm beating the original EPA mileage estimates for my car by a smidgen and the revised 2008 estimates by a hell of a lot I think my "eco-driving" habits are just fine, thank you very much. Posted at 11:05 AM to Driver's SeatAs the owner of a Nissan Quest I've learned that "Nissan" and "Duct Tape" are synonymous. Posted by: Incurable Insomniac at 11:09 AM on 23 August 2007When I got my truck I was averaging 13.5 mpg. Even immediately after replacing the balding mud tires with new mall-terrain tires I sometimes dared imagine I was hitting 14 mpg. My last three or four tankfuls have been 15 mpg. I have no idea what's changed to make that happen. Posted by: McGehee at 1:30 PM on 23 August 2007your Priuses (I refuse to say "Prii") Heh. Lately -- Georgia's school year resumes in early August -- I've found my highway perambulations sometimes interrupted by school bi. Posted by: McGehee at 1:31 PM on 23 August 2007Anyone remember the shift light on Escorts(?)? I refuse to say "Prii" Just how would you pronounce that? Rhyming with Wii? :) Posted by: unimpressed at 2:48 PM on 23 August 2007Another reason to refuse to say it: I don't have to speculate as to the pronunciation. (God, or Eiji Toyoda, forbid it should be "PREE-eye.") Posted by: CGHill at 3:13 PM on 23 August 2007Anyone remember the shift light on Escorts(?)? Saw that on the stickshift Escort my wife and I test-drove a couple of years back (or so). I went through several shifts before I figured out what it was supposed to mean, and ignored it thereafter. My first car was a four-speed stick; I shifted when it sounded like time to shift. Posted by: McGehee at 5:12 PM on 23 August 2007(Oh, and the car I drove while living in Alaska was an Escort, but an automatic.) Posted by: McGehee at 5:14 PM on 23 August 2007My Chevy Avalanche gets 16.5 mpg, according to itself. With the hard top on the bed and with cruise at 60mpg, I get 16.6. Towing a trailer full of arcade games, I get 16.4. What it lacks in efficiency, it makes up for with consistancy. Posted by: Rob "Flack" O'Hara at 7:18 PM on 26 August 2007 |