4 September 2007Damned lies and statisticsAll over blogdom, Tam's seen 'em:
I can't tell you how many times I've seen a blog that is a Large Mammal! in the Ecosystem, with a Technorati score of One Hojillion! and then I open its SiteMeter and it's getting 100 hits a day, all from random Google searches. It turns out that they're on every reciprocal blogroll known to mankind. Feh. That doesn't get you the eyeballs; good writing gets you the eyeballs.
Wait a minute. There are reciprocal blogrolls? I dunno if I'm getting eyeballs, but some body parts seem to be showing up here and on the meter. Posted at 10:21 AM to BlogorrheaIt is funny how this whole thing works isn't it? I really try not to get drawn into the popularity contest aspects of blogging. Although, I couldn't resist the sitemeter thingy, and at one point I thought someone was stalking my blog--numerous visits and pages viewed on a near daily basis, eventually I deduced it was me. I was stalking myself! LOL! It really cracked me up. Pretty sad in a way. Posted by: Heather at 10:53 AM on 4 September 2007You can set SM to ignore your own visits, in case you'd like to stalk yourself unseen. :) Posted by: CGHill at 10:56 AM on 4 September 2007Does the fact that I have no idea what a "reciprocal blogroll" is make me a loser of a blogger? Posted by: GreenCanary at 11:34 AM on 4 September 2007blogoSFERICS/Yippee-Ki-Yay! (this was before I separated out the old bS posts from the less old YKY posts)) had just begun to evolve into a Hairy Primate when I decided I wanted a new URL, and everything went swirling down the drain. I think The McGehee Zone is now an insect, which is really about where I would have been anyway had not Glenn Reynolds blogrolled me in 2002, and the Bear Flag League taken off on its Gray Davis recall-buoyed flight in 2003. Posted by: McGehee at 11:54 AM on 4 September 2007"I dunno if I'm getting eyeballs, but some body parts seem to be showing up here and on the meter. Well, to be honest, I surf with my islets of Langerhans... Posted by: Brett at 12:51 PM on 4 September 2007"good writing gets you the eyeballs." Yeah? Then explain this. Posted by: Mister Snitch! at 6:20 PM on 4 September 2007That, Mister Snitch, is all the result of a misunderstanding. Posted by: triticale at 5:59 AM on 5 September 2007The real mystery is why that Truth Laid Bear site is still considered some sort of accurate measure. There's no analytics at all behind it -- almost completely handmade. I think a site doesn't even show up in the rankings unless it's submitted. Why is anyone still paying attention to it? Posted by: CT at 9:09 AM on 5 September 2007Some people set great store by it; I thank NZB for his work, but I don't obsess over my standing (which I tend to obscure in my linkage anyway). Posted by: CGHill at 10:15 PM on 8 September 2007 |