The Finch Formerly Known As Gold

12 March 2008

What are we conserving, exactly?

I've mentioned before that the palatial Surlywood estate is part of one of Oklahoma City's Urban Conservation Districts, and that while the UCD designation preceded (by a whole month) my arrival, I supported its aims. And with some folks in Tulsa completely spooked by the idea, I figure this would be a good time to explain just what those aims are.

The following was scissored out of Oklahoma City Municipal Code, § 59-13650, paragraph 1:

The Urban Conservation Districts (UC Districts) are intended to promote the health, safety, economic, cultural, and general welfare of the public by encouraging the conservation and enhancement of the urban environment. The purposes of the UC District are:
  1. To identify physical, social and economic resources within the urban environment worthy of conservation.
  2. To maintain neighborhood character and integrity by focusing special attention on the maintenance of the physical environment, the enhancement of physical, social and economic resources, and the accommodation of desirable change.
  3. To prevent economic obsolescence and promote reinvestment by fostering stable property values and a high level of economic activity, by maintaining essential urban services, and focusing financial assistance and other economic development programs.
  4. To promote the efficient use of urban lands, including the encouragement of compatible infill development on vacant and passed-over parcels.
  5. To encourage and support rehabilitation of the physical environment, and programs for the conservation and revitalization of urban areas.
  6. To foster the harmonious, orderly and efficient growth, development and redevelopment of Oklahoma City.

Scary, isn't it?

Where it gets frightful, I suppose, is that bit about "desirable change," which implies that some change is not desirable, and hints that changes that are not desirable are not to be accommodated. In practice, I don't see much of that happening around here; the only time I've had to consult the UCD ordinance at all was when I was looking for a new number plate for the house, and discovered that the maximum size permissible is four square feet. (The one I got is 4x19 inches, well within the limits and easily visible from the street.)

There are restrictions, yes: you can't park on the grass, you can't have a chain-link fence — I have a fairly ordinary six-foot stockade fence — and perhaps most important, if you plan to tear down a house, you can't replace it with a structure three times its size.

So basically, we're conserving a look and a feel; we're trying to maintain the character of a neighborhood that doesn't quite meet the standards for "historic." (All of Oklahoma City's historic districts date to well before World War II.) Just because we paid less doesn't mean we think less of it.

Posted at 6:55 AM to Soonerland


TrackBack: 4:17 PM, 19 March 2008
» Barnes vs. Gomez from BatesLine
The race for Tulsa City Council District 4 is one of the most hotly contested in this year's general election. First-term incumbent Maria Barnes, a Democrat, is being challenged by Eric Gomez, a Republican. My column in this issue of Urban Tulsa Weekly......[read more]

if you plan to tear down a house, you can't replace it with a structure three times its size.

Okay -- I'll tear it down and build one 2.8 times its size, then in a few years tear that one down and build another one 2.8 times its size.

Think they'd notice?

Posted by: McGehee at 3:29 PM on 12 March 2008

Much of what was considered UCD regulations became city code many years ago. Not parking on the grass is one. Our neighborhood president wanted us to consider becoming a UCD. No way. If I want a stone wall then I want a stone wall...to keep out all of those who don't.

Posted by: Aero at 5:33 PM on 12 March 2008

I'll tear it down and build one 2.8 times its size, then in a few years tear that one down and build another one 2.8 times its size. Think they'd notice?

Actually, you'd have trouble with the first version, since you'd almost certainly violate either the setback rule (you can't shrink your front yard by building into it) or the vertical-height rule (you can't go up any higher than the original structure).

Our UCD permits a stone wall provided it meets the fence-height spec (6-8 feet).

Posted by: CGHill at 6:21 PM on 12 March 2008

In other words, they'd notice.

Posted by: McGehee at 9:44 PM on 12 March 2008

Well there goes the tower and moat idea.

Posted by: Aero at 10:15 PM on 12 March 2008

...but oyu can go bunkers.
2,3,4 stories down, if you want...

Posted by: Tatyana at 9:38 PM on 13 March 2008

Rotsa ruck digging down into Oklahoma clay.

Posted by: CGHill at 6:58 AM on 14 March 2008