15 May 2008Please be seated, if you can
Now, that is one short dress. (It's Balmain, by the way.) It's absolutely gorgeous, but it is shorty-short-short. On one hand would you look at those stems and tell me that if you had them you wouldn't parade around with them exposed every dingdong chance you got? It would be hard not to. I do not have an issue with the fashionable-ness of the dress or of the "questionable" appropriateness of a woman of Ms. Paltrow's "advanced age" wearing it. (You can practically hear me rolling my eyes, right? But it's true I read dozens of comments on celebrity blogs scolding her for being too old to wear such dresses. I'm all for age-appropriate dressing, I think we know, but Ms. Paltrow? Is a methuselan 35. It's not like Judi Dench strapped herself into a Rudi Gernreich, for pete's sake.) My quibble is this: How on earth does she sit down in that thing without making a spectacle of herself??? She is going to a movie premiere after all, and at some point I think there is a reasonable expectation that she will sit down to view said movie. Does a personal assistant magically appear at that moment to throw a lovely Hermes shawl over her lap? Do they synchronize the dimming of the lights in the theater with Ms. Paltrow's approach to her seat? Not to mention (and I've said this before) the Ick Factor. Put me in a dress that short (and really, you should not) and you'd find me at said movie theater several hours in advance, steam-cleaning my assigned seat to my own specifications. Not to mention climbing into whatever chauffeured vehicle was conveying me to the event with a bottle of Lysol and a sponge.
But maybe that's just me.... I will say only that horrifying as it may sound, there is such a thing as too short a dress, and that a Google Image search for "judi dench in a rudi gernreich" produced no results. My guess? She's wearing bike shorts under that thing. Posted by: McGehee at 8:08 PM on 15 May 2008...after all, it's what I would do. Posted by: McGehee at 8:10 PM on 15 May 2008Were you to have found said picture of Ms Dench, the world would be a far less lovely place for us all. Posted by: fits at 10:31 PM on 15 May 2008I disagree. There is no such thing as a dress too short. Only shapes that shouldn't display them. This one looks like -- I dunno -- either undergarments or negligee. Hey, if she wants to wear her underwear in public and show us what she's got, who am I to object... heh... Posted by: Winston at 6:11 AM on 16 May 2008My HS sweetie had a dress that short. (This was in 1971-72.) She also had a pair of panties made of the same material. Oh, the fantasies that dress excite(d/s). M Posted by: Mark Alger at 7:56 AM on 16 May 2008OTOH, she was 17 at the time. Now... Not quite Dame Judi, but still... M Posted by: Mark Alger at 8:02 AM on 16 May 2008 |