16 May 2008Quote of the weekThere are those who believe that you can't put something on television if it isn't true. Tam will tell you otherwise:
I'm beginning to think that you could take your garbage man, put him in a white lab coat on a Discovery Channel show, introduce him as the head professor of the phrenology department at Draw Tippy Turtle University, and folks will believe whatever asinine things come out of his cakehole.
While we're at it: what's the difference between one's cakehole and one's piehole? Posted at 7:38 PM to QOTWDilbert, of course, has the quintessential inverse of Tam's example. Personally, I think there are plenty of garbage men whose opinions I would trust before many a genuine professor. Posted by: McGehee at 8:52 PM on 16 May 2008>>While we're at it: what's the difference between one's cakehole and one's piehole? You put cake in one and pie in the other. Posted by: Hazel Stone at 10:46 PM on 16 May 2008The modern day equivalent of not believing everything you read is knowing that everything on TV is the product of someone's overactive (or underachieving) imagination. Posted by: Jennifer at 9:36 AM on 17 May 2008a cake hole is usually square and a pie hole is usually wedge-shaped. So, besides being ungrammatical, "pie are square" is factually incorrect. Posted by: McGehee at 2:26 PM on 17 May 2008Pie are round. |