10 September 2006
The drive for improbability

"Mathematics," says Jason Rosenhouse of EvolutionBlog, "is unique in its ability to bamboozle lay audiences, which makes it well-suited to creationist ends."

Mathematician John Allen Paulos explains how this should be so.

Leaving aside the issue of independent events, which is too extensive to discuss here, I note that there are always a fantastically huge number of evolutionary paths that might be taken by an organism (or a process) over time. I also note that there is only one that actually will be taken.

So if, after the fact, we observe the particular evolutionary path actually taken and then calculate the a priori probability of its being taken, we will get the minuscule probability that creationists mistakenly attach to the process as a whole.

Misunderstanding this tiny probability, they reject outright the evolutionary process.

Not to mention the fact that when one path is taken, all the alternatives to that path are summarily erased and can't be counted in the aggregate. (If the first Powerball number is, say, 10, combinations that don't contain a 10 are out of contention for the Big Bucks; if you have a 10, your chances have just improved markedly.)

Besides, probabilities don't quite combine in the manner we tend to think. For instance, the chance of someone standing next to you having any particular day as a birthday is 4/1461 (which is easier to look at than 1/365.25), or 0.274 percent. The chance that two people in the room have the same birthday obviously increases with the number of people you have, but it becomes a better-than-even bet when the twenty-third person comes in. (Really.)

My own thinking here is that God understands the numbers better than we do.

(Via white pebble.)

Permalink to this item (posted at 9:30 AM)
12 September 2006
Smut as a wedge issue

No, not wedgie issue. Pay attention.

Eric Sapp sees the potential:

When I talk about "wedge issues," I'm talking about issues that divide the Republican religious base from the Republican Party leadership and force Republican voters to face the hypocrisy of the overly-simplistic (but heretofore extremely effective) approach of Republican strategists to electoral mobilization and policy development.

And what issue might do that? Why, pr0n, of course:

One in eight Internet websites is pornographic, and the on-line porn industry generated $12 billion in largely untaxed revenues in 2004, which equals the revenue of ABC, NBC, and CBS combined. If ever there was a family-values issue that affects our children, it is this one. And believe it or not, Dems have a brilliantly-crafted legislative solution: S. 1507/H.R 3479, which require credit card age verification before anyone would be allowed to view any on-line pornographic content. What makes this bill a work of legislative art is that it would pay for the substantial costs of enforcing these regulations by imposing a 25% tax on the internet porn industry.

Anyone figured out why this is a winner for us yet? You've got it, the Republican leadership has been holding up this legislation because they don't like the tax on business! It's hard to imagine a stance more counter to family values and anathema to religious voters than not protecting our children from internet porn because we don't want to tax the on-line porn industry. But that's the position the Rs have taken so far. The White House has also sided with the telecommunication companies and turned a deaf ear to evangelical Christian leaders who have pleaded with them to regulate streaming video on cell phones to prevent our phones from being spammed with streaming pornography. We all know what Jesus said about where one's treasure is, and since the R political machine is run on big-business and lobbyist money, it's no surprise that's where their heart is.

I've regulated streaming video on my cell phone: I've got a phone that won't receive it.

But Sapp has a point: when the big-bucks and the Dr. Dobson segments of the GOP base are in conflict, bet on Mr. Moneybags to win out.

Permalink to this item (posted at 6:19 AM)
19 September 2006
Uh-oh, the D word

Editorial comment by the Telegraph:

The Pope quotes a barbed medieval criticism of Islamic violence in the course of a scholarly discourse, and Muslims all over the world go into uproar; churches are firebombed. The Prime Minister's wife delivers a playful slap to a cheeky teenager, and six detectives rush to question her.

We are living in a world that has lost not only its sense of proportion but also its ability to discriminate.

And the enablers of this loss chant in unison: "But discrimination is wrong!" As, of course, they must; having misappropriated the word for their own purposes, they must now enforce their trademark.

We suspect that Western public opinion is not displeased that Benedict has said the unsayable. Now it is time for other churchmen to tell their Muslim counterparts that, in addition to dishing out criticism, they must learn how to take it.

Islam has swords; Scientology has lawyers. Deprived of these, neither of them would dare pose as a religion, let alone demand a role on the world stage.

Yes, I've heard about those "moderate" Muslims. I think I've even met one or two. Until they figure out some way to shut down — and shut up — the maniacs in their midst, they're the exceptions that prove the rule.

(Muchas gracias: Scribal Terror.)

Permalink to this item (posted at 9:05 AM)
21 September 2006
Audio outreach

This morning I found a plastic bag by the front door. Being in a rush to get to work (yeah, right), I tossed it on the counter.

So the opening was left for this afternoon. Inside I found a 5.5-by-8.5 postcard and an audio CD, both bearing the indicia of Grace Covenant Church, about a mile from me on the other side of the Northwest Distressway.

The CD, which ran a little over eight minutes, featured a pitch by Pastor Lance Gutteridge and a couple of songs by Worship Pastor (I leave it to someone with more expertise than I have to explain this term) Kyle Cantrell. It was definitely a professional-sounding package, up to the last couple of seconds, where things cut off a bit abruptly; as outreach methods go, this strikes me as a pretty good one. Oh, and according to the card, they're having a Good Ole Tent Revival and Ice Cream Social this coming Sunday at 6 pm.

Amusingly, CDDB reads this CD as Barry White's Just for You.

Permalink to this item (posted at 6:06 PM)
12 October 2006
God hates blogs

Especially blogs by teenagers. Here's why, from the Restored Church of God:

Here is the definition of a blog from a highly popular blog provider: "A blog is a personal diary. A daily pulpit. A collaborative space. A political soapbox. A breaking-news outlet. A collection of links. Your own private thoughts. Memos to the world. Your blog is whatever you want it to be. There are millions of them, in all shapes and sizes, and there are no real rules…blogs have…enabled millions of people to have a voice" (emphasis ours).

Ask yourself, "Do I have a tendency to want to have a voice?"

This has grown so out of control it is routine for a person to start a daily blog entry with a single word that details his or her mood. A blog entry will start: "Current mood: ____" The level of shallowness and emotional immaturity this represents is astonishing! In the grand scheme of things, why would the world at large care?

People naturally want to make a mark in this world; they want to make a difference, and many believe blogs will allow them to do this. However, most blogs, especially by teenagers, serve as nothing more than public diaries. (Of course, there is nothing inherently wrong with a personal diary, as long as it is kept private.) Although certain professional weblogs can make a positive difference within some elements of society, teen blogging does not.

Current mood: chortling.

And how dare those little...those little...non-adults have a "tendency to want to have a voice"! Who do they think they are? Us?

Oh, wait, we're not allowed either:

Should teenagers and others in the Church express themselves to the world through blogs? Because of the obvious dangers; the clear biblical principles that apply; the fact that it gives one a voice; that it is almost always idle words; that teens often do not think before they do; that it is acting out of boredom; and it is filled with appearances of evil — blogging is simply not to be done in the Church. It should be clear that it is unnecessary and in fact dangerous on many levels.

Let me emphasize that NO ONE — including adults — should have a blog or personal website (unless it is for legitimate business purposes).

My luck, that asshole Moloch will be late with the frigging checks again.

(Link and title swiped from Cruel.com.)

Permalink to this item (posted at 7:51 PM)
10 November 2006
Meanwhile, Job waits for his rebate check

Under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, he who provides a "full warranty" (anything less is a "limited warranty") must include all of the following:

  • must, as a minimum, remedy the consumer product within a reasonable time and without charge;
  • may not impose any limitation on the duration of any implied warranty on the product;
  • may not exclude or limit consequential damages for a breach of any written or implied warranty on the product, unless the exclusion or limitation conspicuously appears on the face of the warranty; and
  • if the product, or a component part, contains a defect or malfunction, must permit the consumer to elect either a refund or replacement without charge, after a reasonable number of repair attempts.

I'm sure Frank Moss and Warren Magnuson, way back in 1975, never envisioned this:

The word "tithe" is derived from the Hebrew word ma’aser and it literally means a tenth. Ten percent of everything belongs to the Lord. In Malachi 3:10-11, God says, "Bring the whole tithe into the storehouse that there may be food in my house." The 'storehouse' is the Old Testament picture of the New Testament church. So as New Testament believers, we worship the Lord with the tithe; or the ten percent.

But giving away 10% of your income can be a big — and often frightening — commitment! That's why we created the Three-Month Tithing Challenge: a money-back guarantee of sorts. Essentially, it's a contract based on the promises of God in Malachi 3:10-11. We commit to you that if you tithe for three months and God doesn't hold true to His promises of blessings, we will refund 100% of your tithe. No questions asked.

"Good afternoon, One Brimstone Place." The voice was unusually dark.

"You're answering your own phone now?"

"It's hard to get good help these days. Was there something You wanted?"

The Lord God read the paragraphs above. "What do you think? I'm tempted to send a plague of toads."

The Prince of Darkness whistled. "That's some slick guarantee there. Maybe You should just sue them or something."

"Oh, right. Where am I supposed to find a lawyer?"

"Hey, I'm just doing my job," Satan complained. "There's always Google. I hear they're trying not to be evil these days."

"Thank you, Lucifer, you've been as much help as ever."

Click.

(Via Church Marketing Sucks.)

Permalink to this item (posted at 8:42 AM)
23 November 2006
Obligatory Pilgrim story

One of the first things on the agenda after the arrival at Plymouth was the establishment of the Parish Church, and as we are reminded today, its membership was a fairly strait-laced bunch.

That church exists today: as a Unitarian Universalist congregation. No one is likely to accuse them of being strait-laced, and Alexandra suggests how things might have changed over four centuries or so:

The UU's are now the most liberal of the Judeo-Christian religions, welcoming Christians, Pagans, Buddhists, Jews and everyone in between into their congregations. And yet the church in Plymouth was founded by people we have always considered to be one of the most straight-laced, narrow-minded and rigid sects in Christianity. How did this happen?

It's actually not so far-fetched. The Separatists came over here because they wanted the freedom to worship in their own way. In that is the seed of liberal religion. Yes, they believed their way was the only way, but over the years, they grew and their ideas on religion expanded. It may have started with letting a Methodist join, and then perhaps a Baptist, then learning that the Unitarians had some good ideas, so they officially became Unitarians (believing in unity of a singular God, as opposed to Trinitarians, who believe God appears in three forms). Universalists believe that everyone will receive God's grace, that there are no "chosen ones." Unitarian Universalism in its present state was not born until 1961, when the Unitarians officially merged with the Universalists.

Were I in the mood to be snarky, I might characterize this as "evolution in action," but not today.

Permalink to this item (posted at 6:12 PM)
12 December 2006
He prayed, she prayed

If there's a religious gender gap, what's behind it? Bryan Caplan takes a stab at it:

1. Men and women have different cognitive orientations — a difference that is in large part genetic. As the Myers-Briggs personality test powerfully confirms, men are more Thinking, and women are more Feeling. (Or if you prefer the Five Factor Model, men are less Agreeable).

On a deep level, then, men are more inclined to want some hard proof that religious claims are true, while women are more willing to take religious teachings on faith because they sound nice. Burn me at the stake if you must, but it's true.

2. As the great Timur Kuran persuasively argues, social pressure leads to "preference falsification." If other people hassle you for lacking piety — as they do in traditional societies — people will pretend to be pious even if they aren't. The weaker the social pressure, the more sincere people become.

In traditional societies, then, men keep their irreligion to themselves and pretend to be as religious as women. (As Kuran emphasizes, preference falsification also inhibits communication, so men who would be open to irreligious arguments are less likely to ever hear and adopt them).

As traditional mores break down, however, men feel freer to be themselves — and share their doubts with others. In contrast, since their piety was relatively sincere from the start, women don't respond much to the fall in social pressure.

I'm not inclined to go hunt down a stake and a bag of Kingsford just yet, but something about this seems a little disquieting, despite the distant echo of the ring of truth.

(Via Michael Katsimbris.)

Permalink to this item (posted at 6:29 AM)
15 December 2006
God hates figs

For one thing, there's that business about those leaves in the Garden of Eden.

(Courtesy of Mike's Noise.)

Permalink to this item (posted at 7:47 PM)
26 December 2006
The love you take

"It's okay to let go."

You wouldn't think five words would require a lot of rehearsal. I kept saying them, and saying them, and saying them, and never once did I sound like I knew what I was talking about.

The night nurse let me in and directed me to the sign-in sheets. Even the ones with a lot of names on them seemed awfully empty.

He was sleeping, or trying to; the machine was running full tilt trying to keep up with the demand for oxygen by two long-since-worn-out lungs. And he was small, barely the size of a ten-year-old boy, hardly the Superman who loomed over us when I was a ten-year-old boy. The cycle, I thought, is nearly complete; were there a scepter, it would now pass to me. And, dear Lord, what would I ever want with a scepter?

I thought of his wife. She is my age: fifty-three. She has spent half of those years, half of her life, at his side. She has been preparing for this moment for many months now. Her voice is soft, measured, deliberate. Are there screams inside of her, waiting to take her by surprise, to knock her down while she tries to stand? I do not know. It is not for me to ask.

I couldn't bring myself to wake him: what if the sudden appearance of a large, dark figure in the room beside him should be the last thing he would ever see? No. Better this way. Let him rest. He's fought more battles than any of us ever dreamed of, in this, his eightieth year; better that he should just slip away, away from this world, into the peace that lies beyond. I bowed my head, then looked off into the distance for a moment.

"It's okay to let go," I said, and I realized that I wasn't saying it to him at all.

Permalink to this item (posted at 8:36 PM)
27 December 2006
And the Lord said, "Now"

Nothing further need be said.

Later: Well, there's this:


In Loving Memory Of
Ged "Chief" F. Hill

Born
June 2, 1927
Stillmore, Georgia

Died
December 27, 2006
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Place of Rest
Resthaven Memory Gardens
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Arrangements by
Advantage Funeral & Cremation Services
Branstetter Chapel

And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, "Now the dwelling of God is with men, and He will live with them. They will be His people, and God Himself will be with them and be their God. He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away." — Revelations 21:3-4

Permalink to this item (posted at 5:38 PM)
12 January 2007
Pratfall from grace

God, as Albert Einstein noted, does not play dice with the universe, but I suspect He's not above short-sheeting some of us now and then, jokester that He is. And when I get a packet from these folks * on the first day of a three-day ice storm, I have to figure that somewhere beyond the background noise there's a celestial giggle.

Which got louder when I opened the gas bill, I suspect.

* Link may not be safe for work.

Permalink to this item (posted at 12:16 PM)
4 April 2007
Spending those surplice funds

Follieri Capital, which specializes in financial products for Roman Catholics, and Washington Mutual have teamed up to offer the World Missions VISA, which is being launched this week via major advertising campaigns in Catholic publications. One percent of card purchases will be donated to the Church's Society for the Propagation of the Faith, founded in 1822, which supports Catholic missionaries in 120 countries. That's the World Missions VISA. Don't leave Rome without it.

Permalink to this item (posted at 11:00 AM)
16 April 2007
Brick by brick

I've spent a fair amount of time in this space talking about the local Habitat for Humanity chapter and what it's done here in the Big Friendly. Recently I discovered that my old high school back in South Carolina is supporting the Sea Island chapter on Johns Island: there's a full-fledged student club, under the direction of Brenda Buckley-Kuhn, doing volunteer work, including the brick-and-mortar stuff, for the chapter once a month (Saturday, 8 to 4). There are about thirty members of the club, which obviously didn't exist when I was in school: Habitat was founded in 1976, long after I'd escaped into the wild. As an alumnus and occasional donor, I'm happy to see that the Auld School is still on the path of righteousness.

Permalink to this item (posted at 7:54 PM)
6 May 2007
Genesis 101

Courtesy of Happy Catholic, the Top Ten ways the Bible would have been different if it had been written by college students:

10. Last Supper would have been eaten the next morning cold.

  9. The Ten Commandments are actually only five, double-spaced, and written in a large font.

  8. New edition every two years in order to limit reselling.

  7. Forbidden fruit would have been eaten because it wasn't cafeteria.

  6. Paul's letter to the Romans becomes Paul's e-mail to abuse@romans.gov.

  5. Reason Cain killed Abel: They were roommates.

  4. The place where the end of the world occurs: Finals, not Armageddon.

  3. Out go the mules, in come the mountain bikes.

  2. Reason why Moses and followers walked in desert for 40 years: They didn't want to ask directions and look like freshmen.

  1. Instead of God creating the world in six days and resting on the seventh, He would have put it off until the night before it was due and then pulled an all-nighter.

It is not true, however, that part of those forty years in the desert was spent at Burning Man.

Permalink to this item (posted at 6:11 PM)
8 June 2007
Quote of the week (first of two)

Yes, we have a tie again, but then it's been a couple of weeks since we had a QOTW at all.

This first one is a long one, but Will has a long title: 7th Degree Bi-Cosmic Hermeticist and First Deputy in Charge of Doctrinal Enforcement.

[I]t is the nature of the Spirit to hide in plain sight. That is, the Spirit avoids what men would find seductively intriguing. The Spirit avoids the "corridors of power."

Which I've always suspected. Not that I'm exactly enlightened or anything.

Let's face it, the Spirit has a puckish sense of humor. If in 1960 someone had told you that a music was soon coming that would capture the world's imagination and even fundamentally change the world's culture, would you guess that music would be coming out of Liverpool, England?

Astronomers say that if you want to see a star clearly with the naked eye, it's best to look a little to the side of the star. Then the star comes into clear focus. I'm not sure if this applies here, but I do think it interesting.

Here's one of my own coinage: You're more likely to find a quarter on the sidewalk by not looking for it as you are by actually looking. I think this also probably applies to finding love. In either case, anxiety will be kept to a minimum.

Now he tells me.

Permalink to this item (posted at 6:58 AM)
30 July 2007
Fighting to save the humans

Received at the door yesterday — they didn't knock, or I'd have seen it before — a flyer from this church announcing a Back to School Extravaganza called Transformed.

Now that's prime — one might say, Optimus prime — marketing. And, well, it's probably not above the Prince of Darkness to deploy an occasional Decepticon, if you know what I mean.

Permalink to this item (posted at 7:18 PM)
12 August 2007
Somehow this just seems wrong

Hello Kitty tarot cardYet here it is. Compare and contrast with this: "The High Priestess represents wisdom, or an interest in knowledge, intuition and education. She is the feminine consciousness — the virgin goddess, the moon daughter. She challenges you to find what is hidden below the surface of a situation and remember the possibilities you hold inside. It signifies a time to uncover secrets in life because something in the unconscious is waiting to come out. Be guided by intuition and inspiration. She is a bridge to higher plane. Passive and receptive, she guards the gate of the unconscious and connects you to dreams, psychic powers, lunar cycles, and female mysteries. She is a subtle but powerful connection with the collective unconscious or world soul. Sometimes the High Priestess represents an enlightened and chaste woman. She can also represent a mysterious woman, a femme fatale, sexual and charismatic without emotional involvement. She also represents feminine principles and grace. She also can be a signal for the need for solitude, seclusion and meditation as well as wisdom and education." Maybe we should just turn it upside down.

Permalink to this item (posted at 8:15 PM)
23 August 2007
I can has Scripture?

Evidently so:

  1. Oh hai! Dis Paul. I'z sent not by mans but by Baby Jesus and by Invisible Man that made him zomby.

  2. Deer Galatians,

  3. Peas and cookies 2 u from Invisible Man and Baby Jesus,

  4. Who saved from sinz and rezqued u from evil now time,

  5. And gotz gloree 4 eva and eva and eva and eva. Srsly.

I think I liked it better in the original Klingon:

  1. Paul, an apostle ( ghobe' vo' loDpu', ghobe' vegh loD, 'ach vegh Jesus Christ, je joH'a' the vav, 'Iv raised ghaH vo' the Heghpu'),

  2. je Hoch the loDnI'pu' {Note: The mu' vaD "loDnI'pu'" naDev je nuqDaq context allows may je taH correctly translated "loDnI'pu' je sisters" joq "siblings."} 'Iv 'oH tlhej jIH, Daq the yejmey vo' Galatia:

  3. Grace Daq SoH je roj vo' joH'a' the vav, je maj joH Jesus Christ,

  4. 'Iv nobta' himself vaD maj yemmey, vetlh ghaH might toD maH pa' vo' vam present mIghtaHghach age, according Daq the DichDaq vo' maj joH'a' je

  5. vav— Daq 'Iv taH the batlh reH je ever. Amen

For some reason, Firefox's ostensible spellchecker is choking on some of the Klingon text, but on none of the Lolcat text. What can we learn from this?

(Note: Firefox's ostensible spellchecker is also choking on the word "spellchecker.")

Permalink to this item (posted at 2:00 PM)
1 September 2007
Justin Timberlake, theologian

Church bannerThis banner has been flying outside Cornerstone Christian Fellowship Church in Chandler, Arizona, to promote their Greatest Sex Ever series, because, well, where else would you go for a series of lectures on sex? The Home Depot? Still, there's something disquieting about the whole thing, quite apart from the fact that it's yet another manifestation of the unfortunate fact that church marketing sucks. Maybe it's the missionary position? Or perhaps it's just the idea that someone feels it's necessary to push the envelope, as it were, to get people's attention to what are supposed to be Eternal Truths and such. More to the point, I object to the very idea of "bringing sexy back": contrary to popular belief, it never really left.

(Via Dawn Eden.)

Permalink to this item (posted at 10:46 AM)
25 September 2007
And share alike

Wise words from Nate:

I don't know if you believe in a higher power or not; I do, and I think that often helps me put my tiny little frustrations into perspective. I'd love to say I'm the kind of person who wakes up every morning and gives thanks; I'm not. Usually I wake up and wish I was filthy, rotten rich so I could sleep in until 10 and play Super Metroid until 3, then write for five hours and drink myself to sleep. That's not my life, and it probably never will be; but I'm grateful that I have as much as I do, including — if I lay off iTunes and Threadless — enough money to give at least something to those who have literally nothing.

Hmmm. Last weekend I slept in until 10 and — um, never mind.

And I suspect I'm mutating into the kind of person who wakes up every morning and gives thanks, mostly out of delight that I made it through another night. Being this old has that effect, especially if you can't imagine being this old, as I can't.

Permalink to this item (posted at 2:04 PM)
10 October 2007
Paul can has epifunny?

Srsly. Epistle to the Galatians, chapter 3:

  1. Silly Galatians! Wut dangles the string in frunt of u? U saw teh man on stix?

  2. U can haz no catnip from Ceiling Cat, win u playz nice! lol! Not less u can has trusts!

  3. U silly! U haz teh catnips, but you eated it! Now u try try to be good?

  4. Is u just chasin tail?

  5. Does Ceiling Cat has for u catnip and finger wigle trix cuz u gud? Or cuz u has trusts?

  6. Abraham can has trusts, and Ceiling Cat said good kitah!

  7. Win u can has trusts, us is like Abraham!

  8. A long book sayd the Ceiling Cat, even lieks ppl who ownz teh doogie when dey gots teh trusts! Das y Abraham wuz so kewl.

Note: In 6, "kitah" is evidently a variant spelling of "kitteh."

Permalink to this item (posted at 10:24 AM)
27 October 2007
Where the words come from

La Shawn Barber sees down to the undercurrent:

I sense tension in the music of secular artists (Christians and non) who consciously or subconsciously write Christian themes into their songs. They’re trying to remain secular and keep the fanbase, but at the same time, they’re seeking something deeper themselves and/or want to spread subtle messages to fans. I don’t have anything against overtly Christian music per se, but I find this tension in secular music fascinating.

Something like the reverse was true half a century ago. Gospel chords and harmony and the occasional shout abide at the very heart of rhythm and blues — there was a reason they called it "soul" music, after all — and the secularization of the process to produce actual pop hits may or may not have incorporated a spiritual message. There was, however, some question about the propriety of this kind of transformation: for instance, when Sam Cooke temporarily stepped aside from the Soul Stirrers to put out a pop tune ("Lovable," 1956), he used a pseudonym, lest the gospel fans be upset.

And "seeking something deeper" is a universal human experience. It even worked on Motown's assembly line: your attention is invited to Jimmy Ruffin's "What Becomes of the Brokenhearted" (Soul 35022, 1966). As I wrote in Vent #206:

Ruffin's bad dream, if you take the lyrics at face value, is about nothing more than the consequences of a failed love affair: pretty horrible stuff, yes, but not enough to cause ongoing paralysis of the spirit.

Even allowing the dumpee a certain measure of hyperbole, though, doesn't account for lines like "I walk in shadows, searching for light / Cold and alone, no comfort in sight."

If R&B today seems about as spiritual as Fritz Lang's Metropolis, it's due to cold calculation on the part of its vendors — or maybe it's just wandering in the desert, in which case things should get back to normal in about forty years or so.

Permalink to this item (posted at 9:52 AM)
10 November 2007
The last existential errand

It took longer, I suppose, but the transit of Saul of Tarsus, persecutor turned theologian, can be seen in the life of Norman Mailer, atheist turned, well, Mailerian. What this means, more or less:

In a new book, On God, a dialogue with one of his literary executors, Michael Lennon, he lays out his highly personal vision of what the universe's higher truths might look like, if we were in a position to know them. But his theology is not theoretical to him. After eight decades, it is what he believes to be true. He expects no adherents, and does not profess to be a prophet, but he has worked to forge his beliefs into a coherent catechism.

Mailer's deity is much like Mailer. He or she is an artist — with the stipulation that God is the greatest artist — concerned most particularly with the human soul, but with much else besides. God takes great pleasure in his creations. God is constantly experimenting, and highly fallible. God is far from all-powerful, but is learning along with us. God is in constant struggle with his own fallibility, and also with evil — with the devil — and is not certain whether good will triumph in the end. We are God's creations, but we are not at all times part of his plan — God may not even be cognizant of all that we do. And if God needs our love, the question Mailer insists has to be answered is, Why?

Like Emerson, Mailer borrows from countless other traditions, discarding their husks, or rewrites them. (Mailer allows that Jesus may very well have been the son of God, but thinks that his crucifixion and resurrection must have been a mistake and the mistake's crude fix.) In place of heaven (his hell seems like a celestial DMV), Mailer posits a system of reincarnation retooled from the Indian religions. Karmic factors certainly play a role, but God's creative interests, as well as his needs in his struggle with the devil, are more important. Not only bodies, but souls, too, can be eliminated for various reasons — sometimes they're tired, sometimes simply because they're no longer interesting to God. Evolution is God's studio. Some of his creations work, and some need improvement — Mailer believes in a highly modified version of Intelligent Design.

And one month after On God was published, Mr. Mailer was invited to — or disinvited from — the heaven whose existence he questions. Maybe. It is not for you or me to know his final destination.

But I'd like to think that he gets credit, his rejection of orthodoxy (or his concept thereof) notwithstanding, for coming up with a perspective that actually admits to the existence of evil, a notion highly unpopular with some and routinely mislocated by others.

Permalink to this item (posted at 9:19 AM)
24 December 2007
Casting one's bread upon the waters

It's traditional to come up with something heartwarming for the holidays, and, well, you know how well that works around here, racked with cynicism as this place generally is.

Not this time, folks:

Occasionally churches get it right — they do something so significant that it makes you stand back in awe and amazement. And as a critic of the way most churches operate — as self-serving institutions, the event that occurred at my church did just that.

"Give Back Sunday" could have been a cheesy superficial marketing tool — allowing the congregation to take a little money out of the offering plate instead of giving money to the church. Whoopee. I get to take a buck and buy someone a cup of coffee — but oh wait, I can't even do that with a dollar. I can get someone a stick of gum ... maybe. What can I get someone for a dollar?

Anyway, everyone was invited to participate in taking an unmarked envelope out of the offering plate. There was a sense of palpable skepticism, as well as anticipation, in the congregation before we opened the envelopes. When we finally peeked inside, a stunned silence filled the pews. Wow. $20, $50 and $100 bills were in the envelopes — a total of over $13,500, with the instruction that we could not spend it on ourselves. We were told to bless someone this week because you have been richly blessed.

Here are some of the blessings that were spread around.

The cynic might say, "Must be nice, if the church has thirteen grand to spread around like that with no guarantees." But faith never has any guarantees, at least of the sort covered by Federal legislation. Nor is faith a slot machine, where you hope to get the right combination for a payoff.

This church easily could have committed these funds to Yet Another Outreach Program. Instead, they chose to trust the congregation to pay it forward, and so they did. Now that's faith. In action, even.

Permalink to this item (posted at 6:09 PM)
11 January 2008
A triumph for antidisestablishmentarianism

And how often do you get to see that?

A motion calling for the disestablishment of the Church of England appeared on the House of Commons order paper [for 10th January] — bizarrely numbered 666, the number associated with the Antichrist.

Bob Russell, Liberal Democrat MP for Colchester, one of the signatories, said: "It is incredible that a motion like this should have, by chance, acquired this significant number. This number is supposed to be the mark of the Devil. It looks as though God or the Devil have been moving in mysterious ways. What is even stranger is that this motion was tabled last night when MPs were debating blasphemy."

Karl Rove was reportedly nowhere near Parliament at the time.

(Spotted by Emalyse.)

Permalink to this item (posted at 8:26 AM)
23 January 2008
I find their lack of licensing disturbing

You have to wonder what George Lucas must be thinking right about now:

Two Star Wars-loving brothers planning a Jedi church hope it will be much nearer than a galaxy far, far away.

Barney and Daniel Jones want fellow devotees to be able to join them close to their home on Anglesey. Barney, 26 — or Master Jonba Hehol — and Daniel, 21 — Master Morda Hehol — head the UK Church of the Jedi, in honour of the film's good knights.

They say their services will include sermons on "the Force," light sabre training, and meditation techniques.

For this to work, contact with the likes of Jar Jar Binks must be strictly forbidden.

(From TheForce.net via Fark.)

Permalink to this item (posted at 2:34 PM)
27 January 2008
To ward off that L. Ron hubbub

Clayton Jones proposes a new statute:

I've been playing around for a long while with an idea, what to do about Scientology, and especially what to do about the kind of crap it tries pulling in courts to prevent its exposure, and I've come to the conclusion, just a small tweak to Federal law would put a really big dent in it, which tweak would be, that no person or organization claiming exemption from the operation of any Federal law (income tax, e.g.) on religious grounds would be permitted to hold or claim, directly or indirectly, any copyright, patent, trademark, or trade secret. Either you're a religion, or you're a business; you cannot be both.

It occurs to me that if we had reasonable copyright laws — which would require, among other things, getting rid of the DMCA, a task at least as difficult as dislodging Xenu — we wouldn't have to care about how the Thetans operate.

Besides, I'd expect even some of your non-insane religions to object to this proposal, and I have some serious qualms about the whole idea of empowering a government body to declare who is and who isn't a religion. (I won't mention any names, but its initials are I.R.S.)

Still, I admit to a certain amount of nostalgia for the time when Tom Cruise was just an actor with very white teeth.

Permalink to this item (posted at 9:55 AM)
31 January 2008
Hence, "program from hell"

Who knew? Apparently Satan uses TurboTax:

I have no idea whether he files on time; inasmuch as he's not an Oklahoma public official, I assume he does.

Permalink to this item (posted at 1:22 PM)
8 February 2008
The pleasant harp with the psaltery

Then again, maybe not:

A local Church of Christ's decision to add musical instruments to its worship service has struck a wrong note with other church members.

"I do not believe that God is anti-instruments. The arguments that attempt to prove that He is are not persuasive to me," minister Mark Henderson said Wednesday.

Other ministers and members of Churches of Christ have denounced the recent addition of instrumental music to the worship service at Henderson's Quail Springs Church of Christ.

"There is no New Testament precedent for using instruments," Glover Shipp, author and retired Oklahoma Christian University professor, said Wednesday.

And so there isn't. There is also no New Testament precedent for air conditioning, but not a lot of churches pass it up.

Still, this is a conservative denomination, and were I a member, I might look askance at any break in tradition, however seemingly minor. However, I don't think I'd buy a page in the local newspaper to advertise my displeasure, and I definitely wouldn't be claiming something special about my own particular pulpit:

[T]he Churches of Christ, as a whole, do not recognize modern day apostolic authority because we find no authorization for such authority outside of the local congregation. Each congregation is autonomous. No congregation has authority over another. That includes authority to "mark" others with whom we disagree.

Does this portend an Anglicanesque schism? I don't think so. But it does remind me of how much authority I have in spiritual matters, which is none.

Disclosure: I was once married to a Freed-Hardeman girl, so I'm more familiar with this than you might think.

Permalink to this item (posted at 7:02 AM)
22 February 2008
The blessing of the beer

Right out of the Rituale Romanum, via Niall Mor:

Bene+dic, Domine, creaturam istam cerevisae, quam ex adipe frumenti producere dignatus es: ut sit remedium salutare humano generi: et praesta per invocationem nominis tui sancti, ut, quicumque ex ea biberint, sanitatem corporis, et animae tutelam percipiant. Per Christum Dominum nostrum. Amen.

The embedded +, of course, represents the Sign of the Cross. Translation:

Bless, O Lord, this creature beer, that Thou hast been pleased to bring forth from the sweetness of the grain: that it might be a salutary remedy for the human race: and grant by the invocation of Thy holy name, that, whosoever drinks of it may obtain health of body and a sure safeguard for the soul. Through Christ our Lord. Amen.

Notice the resemblance between the Latin "cerevisa" and the Spanish "cerveza." Also note that this is not the traditional Lager Prayer.

I admit, though, either seems to border on overkill if what you're serving is [fill in name of horrid swill that barely deserves to be called beer].

Permalink to this item (posted at 2:19 PM)
12 March 2008
Now that's mission creep

The only Italian I understand is "Monica Bellucci," and that not particularly well, so I'm not going to attempt to decipher this very-1996-looking page from L'Osservatore Romano, but I will point you toward what appears to be a Vatican attempt to expand the existing list of sins:

Fresh off the red telephone with Providence, a senior member of the Vatican is upgrading a handful of lesser celestial bugaboos into what now will effectively destroy the grace of God within the heart of the sinner.

The Vatican's newspaper L'Osservatore Romano interviewed senior cleric Gianfranco Girotti, head of the Apostolic Penitentiary (basically, the bureau of sin and absolution), who listed drug trafficking, pollution, social injustice and genetic manipulation as the new bleeding edge of mortal sins.

"If yesterday, sin had a rather individualistic dimension, today it has a weight, a resonance, that's especially social, rather than individual," the Associated Press translates from Girotti.

Um, no, it doesn't. Gail explains, under a better title than mine:

The man is a theological idiot, and I sincerely hope Benedict smacks him down very smartly. The idea that sin is no longer an "individual" matter but a "social" one undermines the entire foundation of the Christian concept of salvation, namely the uniqueness of each immortal soul and its absolute primacy in all moral considerations. He's one step away from utilitarianism, and that's a slippery theological slope.

I believe the rule here is "Do whatever steps you want if / You have cleared them with the Pontiff." Somehow I have my doubts that Girotti has Benedict's blessing on this matter.

Permalink to this item (posted at 6:41 PM)
6 April 2008
A mighty road car is our Ford

Coming soon to eastern Kansas, the Mustang Church of America:

Charles Ales loves Mustangs and doing good to others, so he's putting it all together and starting the Mustang Church of America and Museum.

"There's not another one like it in the world," said Ales, lifelong car collector. "I've been around car nuts all my adult life. You can mess with their wives, you can mess with their dogs, but you can't mess with their cars. It borders on a religion with them, so I built them a church."

So far, the only automaker actually named after a god is Mazda.

Top Ten new religious movements of an automotive nature:

  1. The Porschetarians
  2. Chevrolaity
  3. Seekers of Infiniti
  4. Office of the Archmitsubishop
  5. V-Sikhs
  6. LaSallevation Army
  7. Gnashticism
  8. Subarutherans
  9. GTOrthodoxy
  10. Society of St. Prius X

Jesus, we may assume, was partial to Hondas; in Acts 2, the disciples managed to get to the first Pentecost in one Accord.

(Via the heretics at Autoblog.)

Permalink to this item (posted at 6:17 AM)
12 April 2008
Belief versus bucks

We open with Matthew 6:19-21 (English Standard Version):

Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal, but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.

Dr. Lisa Keister has now discovered that religious conservatives tend to take this seriously:

According to data analyzed by Keister, a Duke University sociologist, the median net worth for conservative Protestants in 2000 was $26,000, compared to the national median of $66,200.

This really shouldn't surprise anyone, though:

[C]onservative Protestants tend to have lower levels of education and begin large families at younger ages, with fewer women working outside the home. These factors make it difficult for many conservative Protestant families to save money or accumulate wealth.

But the bottom line is purely Biblical. Think "faithful steward":

"The one big difference is the conservative Protestants' assumption that God is the owner of money, and people are managers of it," Keister said. "They are doing with their money what God wants them to do with it, so that does mean that it is not sitting in their bank accounts."

Not to mention their unwillingness to render it unto Caesar.

Permalink to this item (posted at 10:05 AM)
The Finch Formerly Known As Gold

These archives begin 6 September 2006. For items beginning in August 2002, click here and select the desired category.

Click the Permalink on an individual entry to read comments and TrackBacks if any.