|
12 September 2006
We'll keep you advised, kinda sorta
Frosty Troy (The Oklahoma Observer, 10 September) quotes an unnamed "former TV reporter":
To run a bulletin or even a crawl on a grass fire is sufficient. Instead, I stood out for three hours doing cut-ins for non-stop live coverage. God knows what the helicopter cost.
Frosty's been harping on this for at least twenty years; I sent him a particularly heinous example of non-news from Los Angeles back in 1988. Things have not improved a great deal. And another thing:
KOSU-FM [at Oklahoma State University, Stillwater] and OKC's KTOK are the only radio stations with full-time Capitol correspondents.
That's scary, if nobody in Tulsa, where there's more serious news/talk competition than there is in Oklahoma City, bothers to position a reporter at the Capitol. Permalink to this item (posted at 8:14 AM)
No Times left for you
The New York Times Company will sell its nine television stations and refocus on its print and Internet properties. The official company statement:
"These are well-managed and profitable stations that generate substantial cash flows and are located in attractive markets," Janet L. Robinson, the company’s president and chief executive, said in a statement.
But, she added, "We believe a divestiture would allow us to sharpen our focus on developing our newspaper and rapidly growing digital businesses, and the synergies between them, thereby increasing the value of our company for our shareholders." And they've been expressing concerns to investors:
Our network-affiliated broadcast stations face significant competition. Several developments could cause further fragmentation of the television viewing audience and therefore increase competition, including:
This fragmentation may adversely affect our television stations' ability to sell advertising. Even allowing for the fact that all such statements to investors are primarily intended as CYA devices, it's no particular secret that NYT Class A stock has been tanking for almost a year, and the divestiture would put some cash in the company coffers while investors are staying away. NYT operates television stations in eight mostly middle-sized markets, all of them solo operations except in Oklahoma City, where the company owns KFOR-TV (an affiliate of NBC) and KAUT (an affiliate of MyNetworkTV). There is no indication so far as to whether the stations will be dealt as a group or sold off to individual buyers. Permalink to this item (posted at 8:07 PM)
14 September 2006
Or you can just call them "alternative"
Stories are circulating that leftish radio network Air America Radio is flirting (in a nonsexist manner, of course) with bankruptcy; if they do in fact go under, their affiliates might find themselves scrambling for new programming. The following formats might draw comparable, or even higher, audience numbers:
* At an estimated fourteen minutes per day, this alone would not be sufficient to fill a daily schedule. Permalink to this item (posted at 6:20 AM)
15 September 2006
Balancing local and yokel
The Federal Communications Commission ordered its staff to destroy all copies of a draft study that suggested greater concentration of media ownership would hurt local TV news coverage, a former lawyer at the agency says.
Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) is "dismayed":
In a letter sent to [FCC Chairman Kevin] Martin Wednesday, Boxer said she was "dismayed that this report, which was done at taxpayer expense more than two years ago, and which concluded that localism is beneficial to the public, was shoved in a drawer."
Martin said he was not aware of the existence of the report, nor was his staff. His office indicated it had not received Boxer's letter as of midafternoon Thursday. I can appreciate Boxer's dismay: whatever the alleged benefits of media consolidation, they are, I think, outweighed by the inevitably higher level of media homogenization that results. The report claims that locally-owned stations put on more news:
The analysis showed local ownership of television stations adds almost five and one-half minutes of total news to broadcasts and more than three minutes of "on-location" news. The conclusion is at odds with FCC arguments made when it voted in 2003 to increase the number of television stations a company could own in a single market. It was part of a broader decision liberalizing ownership rules.
Of the major-network affiliates in Oklahoma City, only one can be construed as "local": KWTV, the CBS outlet, owned by Griffin Communications LLC, whose holdings include two other stations, both in Tulsa. I avoid watching TV news as a general rule bad for my dyspepsia but if there's any indication that News 9 (or Tulsa's The News on 6) actually put on more news than their competitors, I'd like to hear about it. (And if there isn't, I'd like to hear about that too.) (Disclosure: Yours truly was once interviewed by News 9. Good thing it wasn't twice.) Permalink to this item (posted at 2:08 PM)
16 September 2006
Jacking points
Now that I think about it, it's a perfectly legitimate question: "Can they put Jack FM on AM?" Apparently, they did, for a while anyway. Lou Pickney's VarietyHits.com, which tracks Jack and Bob and Sam and all those other characters, reports:
On August 1, 2004, Michael Radio Group's 870 KJMP (yes, an AM station) began simulcasting [KJAC Denver]. This was a surprising move, since KJMP was a 1,200 watt daytime/300 watt nighttime station in Ft. Collins which didn't cover any territory that KJAC didn't reach.
The Northeast Broadcasting Company acquired KJMP on February 15, 2006. On July 17, 2006, KJMP dropped its simulcast of Jack and become a simulcast of Oldies 104.9 KRRR in Cheyenne (also owned by Northeast.) Besides the notion of Jack FM on the AM dial being strange, KJMP fell entirely within the broadcast radius of KJAC, rendering it pointless except to those with AM-only radios. I mention in passing that KJAC was the first Jack FM station in the US, following a successful launch in Canada. Permalink to this item (posted at 7:48 AM)
15 October 2006
Mourning Sedition
The crack young staff of The Hatemonger's Quarterly have thought about the Air America Radio bankruptcy filing, and have decided that it's the government's fault:
Well, allow us to be more specific: We believe that the publicly-funded festival of upper-middle class leftism known as National Public Radio (a.k.a. National Palestinian Radio) had more than a little to do with the Air America belly flop. So, if our rabid left-wing pals, irate over Air America's manifest failure, want to point the finger of blame at anyone, perhaps they should tilt it in the direction of Uncle Sam. Or, at least, Garrison Keillor.
If you ask us, it's a very simple matter. "Progressive" radio will inevitably have a tough time winning fans thanks to the popularity of NPR in left-liberal circles. Apparently, there are only so many tote bags you can own, only so many soporific radio personalities you can stomach. There are a couple of obviously-pickable nits here:
Still, the Hatemongers' point seems valid: there is only so much audience for any given radio format. NPR is the 800-pound gorilla in the left-of-political-center marketplace; farther to the left, there are a handful of community stations and the Pacifica network, and that's about it. Permalink to this item (posted at 11:47 AM)
22 October 2006
Just try and find us now
Tomorrow, WWLS-FM, the FM side of the Sports Animal, will move to 97.9, displacing KKWD, the erstwhile Wild 97.9, which will set up shop at the vacated 104.9 spot. Precisely why this is being done is unclear to me: both of these are 6-kw facilities with essentially identical coverage areas. KKWD is promoting the arrival of HD Radio at the new frequency, which is all very well and good, since according to Ibiquity, the 104.9 spot is already set up for HD. But this invites the question: why couldn't Citadel add HD Radio at 97.9? The answer, I'm guessing, has to do with adjacent-channel interference. Apparently the digital component of an HD Radio signal, while fitting within the assigned spectrum space, can leak over a channel (or two) in lower-quality receivers, which is most of them. But I have other reservations about this entire digital-ish radio scheme. Robert Conrad heads up WCLV in Cleveland (coincidentally, at 104.9), and he's not thrilled with it at all:
The initial appeal to the consumer was to be improved quality of sound. But, frankly, the difference between a high quality analog signal, such as WCLV's classical music programming, and the HD signal is minimal. And with highly processed rock programming, you can't tell any difference.
So what will be the appeal of HD? The answer is the additional programming channels on the HD2 and HD3 channels. However, there is a serious flaw. We were told back in the beginning that the HD coverage would be equal to the analog signal. Unfortunately, the industry is now finding out this is not the case, that the HD coverage is considerably less, something like 60% of the analog coverage. We've also found that even in a strong HD signal area, a dipole antenna is required. We were also told that the HD would lessen interference with adjacent channel signals. That also appears not to be the case. This is really very discouraging and is leading us to wonder why we should bother to promote HD. To do so will only disappoint, and, perhaps, antagonize a significant segment of the audience who finds that the system doesn't deliver. No Oklahoma City station is using the HD2/HD3 channels for alternate programming, so far as I know. (Clear Channel's Tulsa FMs are.) And if you thought HD in radio meant the same thing as HD in television, think again:
"Quite honestly, it doesn't stand for anything," said Peter Ferrera, president and CEO of the HD Digital Radio Alliance. "The concept was somewhat of a steal from HD television, where viewers know it means better quality."
I will, of course, keep one preset for the Sports Animal: on AM, at 640. Permalink to this item (posted at 12:12 PM)
28 October 2006
Widescream
I don't watch too much TV practically none this time of year, what with the deluge of noxious political spots so I probably won't be an early HDTV adopter. And if I were going to be, Matt Deatherage would have talked me out of it:
I've had HDTV capabilities for two years now, and I don't advise anyone here to make the investment in it yet.
Why? Because the local stations and providers screw it up all the time (and yes, Mike, I almost literally mean that). All five major networks broadcast in HDTV in Oklahoma City, but honest to God, they just don't take it very seriously, and there are strong indications that the management of most of these stations just doesn't give a damn. Cox OKC's digital cable refuses to carry either the Fox or ABC local HD affiliates (KOKH-DT for Fox, KOCO-DT for ABC) because the station owners (Sinclair Broadcasting and Hearst/Argyle of Ohio/Oklahoma, respectively) demand extra payments to carry their digital stations and Cox refuses to pay it. DirecTV will start carrying them in MPEG-4 by the end of the year (so you can only get them with DirecTV's own HD receivers and recorders, not the TiVo one), but like all HD over satellite, it will be far, far more compressed than the picture over the air and will cost you more money. Cox dropped KOCO-DT on October 1 after the previous contract expired, which meant Cox customers did not get the OU-Texas game in HD unless they had an over-the-air (OTA) antenna. The very next day, on Sunday, KOCO decided it needed to do "some work" on its digital transmitter so it went dark for two days. It is unimaginable that a commercial network TV affiliate would take its signal off the air for two days, but that's just what they did for the digital signal if you didn't have analog OTA capabilities (and I don't), ABC was just gone for two days. Not one of the OKC stations has spent the money on the technology necessary to superimpose graphics over an HD signal, nor can they even record or rebroadcast HD signals. If they don't pass along the network HD feed as it's being broadcast nationally, it won't be in HD here. KFOR-DT can't show Jeopardy in HD, just as KOCO-DT can't show Wheel of Fortune in HD, even though both shows are broadcast that way as of this season. And it goes on and on. Color me unsold on the concept for now. (A plug here for HDTV in Oklahoma, which covers issues of this sort, and to which Mr Deatherage is a contributor.) Permalink to this item (posted at 7:00 PM)
6 November 2006
Off Point
Former Sinclair Broadcast Group vice-president Mark Hyman, who has been delivering daily commentaries on Sinclair stations' news broadcasts, is giving up his slot at the end of the month, saying that he's "exhausted" and wants "to focus more on family activities." Hyman's "The Point" was a regular feature of Sinclair's NewsCentral offerings, and was regularly applauded and/or excoriated for its distinct right-wing flavor. (Modest excoriation here.) Sinclair CEO David Smith said that "The Point" has "invoked thoughtful discussions on many topics and across all demographics." My own take, from January 2004:
Hyman leans decidedly right, which doesn't bother me; however, he has that patented Fox News snarkier-than-thou smirk, which does. (Note to television executives: If you're gonna rip off the Fox News Channel, rip off its most appealing feature: news babes in outfits that seem scantier than they really are.) I'm not sure how well this will play in markets less conservative than Oklahoma City, which is, well, almost all of them.
"The Point" airs locally on KOKH, a Fox affiliate. Permalink to this item (posted at 11:00 AM)
23 November 2006
What about Bob?
In the last couple of weeks, KQOB, aka Bob FM, has revamped its morning show and gone to Christmas music 24/7. The Rumor Mill seized upon this as an indication that there's a format change coming around the first of the year. I'll throw a few cups of kerosene on the fire:
According to Lou Pickney, who keeps track of these matters, the Next Big Thing is "Movin", a sort of Rhythmic Adult Contemporary format that targets women 25-44. The rationale makes sense:
The Movin target is that segment of 28-40 year-old women who feel too old for hip-hop, but are bored with rock-based Hot AC and not ready for traditional AC.
I can certainly understand someone being bored with rock-based Hot AC, like Citadel's KYIS (KISS) FM. What is Bob to do? The reflexive action is to go see what's happening in a hipper town, which some of us may define as "a place where the top two radio stations aren't both country," and There are three possible options I could sort of endorse, none of which I expect to take place:
(Disclosure: Arbitron, the firm which produces the standard industry ratings, has been pestering me for two weeks to start keeping a diary as part of their local survey. I have declined.) Permalink to this item (posted at 3:05 PM)
1 December 2006
Is this the future of radio?
With everybody defecting to satellite or shuffling their iPods, allegedly there's no audience left for good old FM, let alone even-older AM.
I've been told, more than once, that the way around the copyright hassles involved with podcasts (basically, you can't play music from the big record companies namely, most music you know without [jumping through legal hoops] that are very much not in the lightweight-labor ad-hocky nature of what podcasters do) is to get a real (FCC licensed) radio station to play your podcast. Because they're allowed to play that music and you're not.
So, if you can get a friendly station to run your 'cast at 3am on a Sunday or whatever, you're set. True? San Francisco-based KYOU ("Open Source Radio") says that's exactly what they do:
If you’ve got a podcast that contains copyrighted music and a radio station decides to play it, it can be rebroadcast and, providing all DMCA rules are adhered to, it can be streamed as well. Since stations that play music pay all licensing fees (ASCAP, BMI, SESAC & SoundExchange) those fees will cover the music in the podcast.
This does not necessarily have anything to do with the fact that I finally got around to replacing my 31-year-old microphone last week. Permalink to this item (posted at 6:18 AM)
26 December 2006
The Top 250 in Hell
Radio is ruled these days by research, and research indicates that this batch of craptacular tune-like objects scored highest among In other words, if you own a station and you have one of these formats, you are expected to set those specific tracks at the very heart of your rotation, because the hope of hearing them is what keeps the audience from pushing the Scan button during your string of twelve consecutive spots at 44 minutes after the hour. Aside to Apple: This list, all by itself, should sell a few thousand iPods to an audience increasingly gruntled by these discs. Permalink to this item (posted at 1:21 PM)
8 January 2007
4 warned
The New York Times is on its way out of the television business, having dealt its Broadcast Media Group to Oak Hill Capital Partners, a diversified investment firm with lots of holdings, none of them in broadcast. The Times retains its two New York radio stations, WQXR (classical) and WQEW (Radio Disney under a local marketing agreement). So what happens to KFOR and KAUT, the two Oklahoma City stations that were sold? Nothing, at least at first. Oak Hill has given no indication that it plans to sell off any of the stations they're buying. Oak Hill was founded by Fort Worth billionaire Robert Bass; among the partners are Phil Knight of Nike and Microsoft's Bill Gates. Permalink to this item (posted at 10:18 AM)
28 January 2007
"Negroes in the News"
That's the title of a radio program developed by Abram Ross in 1948, and it's mentioned in a retrospective of black radio in Oklahoma in this morning's Oklahoman, compiled by Oklahoma Historical Society columnist Max Nichols. One of the more disheartening aspects of it all was the fact that there was this tremendous music scene in Deep Deuce in the 1920s and 1930s that wasn't even slightly reflected by Oklahoma City radio. (Current OKC bands will sigh and go "So what else is new?) In the late 1940s, things started to change, albeit slowly. Black churches got their services on the air; station KBYE, founded in 1946, began adding programs aimed at the African-American audience. The legendary Ben Tipton, later a fixture at KOCO-TV and eventually an Oklahoma City Councilman just in case you thought Mick Cornett did it first was arguably the first black radio star in these parts. (Tipton's last radio gig, if I remember correctly, was at the much-missed KAEZ, a black-owned station that broadcast from on top of a hill at 23rd and Coltrane.) KBYE, which later added an FM service, sustained its audience into the 1970s, the AM side concentrating on gospel, the FM on popular soul music. The go-to guy in "urban" radio these days, of course, is Russell M. Perry, publisher of the Black Chronicle, who started with one AM daytimer and now owns fourteen stations, including KRMP/KVSP in Oklahoma City. All this is to herald an Historical Society production, scheduled for the 10th of February, titled "History of African Americans in Oklahoma Radio Broadcasting." Permalink to this item (posted at 10:19 AM)
2 March 2007
Get to the point
It was Billy Joel, I think, who addressed the issue most directly:
It was a beautiful song but it ran too long
If you're gonna have a hit, you gotta make it fit So they cut it down to 3:05. But that was 1974; in this era of InstaEverything, even 3:05 is an eternity. I once put together a compilation CD with no songs over two minutes, which if nothing else makes for rather more variety: 42 tracks in just under 80 minutes. Radio wouldn't dare do this. Well, actually, they would. Enter Radio SASS (Short Attention Span System), which unapologetically edits your standard classic-rock tracks down to the essential stuff. Purists, of course, will be horrified. Stations, they say, should be delighted:
Records that were 2:00 3:00 minutes long have been replaced by repetitive epics. It's not unusual for today's recordings to regularly cross the four or five minute mark. The immediacy of radio has ground to a musical dawdle. While TV, newspapers, movies and other media have sped up, radio has fallen out of pace with today's rapid lifestyle. Button pushing listeners and competition from new media is fierce. TSL is down.
A return to shorter songs is essential. Will listeners object? The answer is no. Several focus groups conducted by Harker Research show that most people don't even notice. When a song begins, the average radio listeners pays attention to the beginning then makes a snap judgment. Do I know this? Do I like it? Then it's punch or play. They seldom reflect on the song as it ends. Most people use radio as wallpaper, a background to their daily activity. I sampled some SASS, and I think I'd notice that they'd boiled down Manfred Mann's take on Springsteen's "Blinded by the Light," which runs around 7:05 in its LP incarnation and 3:48 as a single, to a startling 1:45 but it would take probably half a minute for it to sink in, and by then they're a third of the way through the next song. So I'm inclined to think this would work better than you'd think. Try to imagine Iron Butterfly's infamous psychotrope "In-a-Gadda-da-Vida" in two minutes flat. I did. Permalink to this item (posted at 7:06 AM)
7 March 2007
Beethoven rolls over the dial
There was media rumble at the end of February about country music returning to the Los Angeles FM radio dial after a six-month absence, and it didn't occur to me to ask what it had replaced.
[T]he Los Angeles commercial classical music station KMZT-FM (105.1) "K-Mozart" switched its format to country music, bringing the latter genre back to FM radio in the Los Angeles-Orange County market.
The Los Angeles Times reports that KMZT (formerly 105.1 FM) has swapped names and formats with sister station KKGO (formerly 1260 AM) billed as "Go Country." The paper quotes owner Saul Levine, president of their parent company, Mt. Wilson FM Broadcasters, as saying, "After 18 years of programming classical music, which I love, it's been an agonizing thing, something we haven't done on the spur of the moment. I really hope the classical music audience will be understanding. I sympathize with those who will be upset." Two college stations will continue with classical formats on FM: KCSN (Cal State Northridge) and KUSC (University of Southern California). Permalink to this item (posted at 11:14 AM)
23 May 2007
Not to be confused with Hilda Doolittle
Much to my amazement, I now have HD. Sort of. Monday I ordered this little LCD HDTV set for not a whole lot of money, and it arrived today in entirely too pretty a box. In fact, that may be the whole issue with this set: it's too pretty. Functionality is there, mostly, but you have to look for it, and my capacity for finding such seems to be on the wane of late. For instance: this set seemed perfect, at a mere 15 lb, for the articulated arm that sticks out of the bedroom wall to accommodate a television set. And indeed the arm isn't strained in the least. On the downside, the set is too narrow to take full advantage of the supports provided, and there is one noticeable form of strain: eyestrain, since I apparently can't see up that high anymore without craning my neck, which would cause yet another noticeable form of strain. So it sits on the dresser, atop a DVD player. Noticeable good things:
Noticeable bad things:
And yes, this was bought from Woot, which sold over a thousand of them in nine and a half hours, most of which were dark. Permalink to this item (posted at 7:55 PM)
27 May 2007
Way back there in 16:9
On Wednesday I took delivery of a new television set, and few things in life make as little sense together as "20-inch" and "widescreen." Nonetheless, this is an HD-capable box with an ATSC tuner, and I was able to stare in mesmerized disbelief at the 1080i (1920 x 1080 pixels) broadcasts on CBS, NBC and OETA. It is a measure of potential obsessiveness, I think, that I put in a bid on eBay this morning for another LaserDisc player, despite the fact that I have a working LD machine already, and a slightly newer one at that. (Then again, this model plays both sides of the disc without having to get up and turn it over, which appeals to my inner sybarite.) I was ultimately outbid, which is perhaps just as well, inasmuch as I couldn't really connect it up properly: my DVD player is connected up via S-Video and while there's a composite input to spare, there's no extra audio input to be had. I suppose I could avoid this by buying a new DVD player with HDMI I thought the one I had was so equipped, and subsequently discovered the HDMI-like jack to be something else entirely but I tend to be distrustful of any technology which is enthusiastically endorsed by content providers on general principle. Permalink to this item (posted at 10:37 PM)
3 June 2007
How universal a remote?
From the instructions for the remote to my little LCD HDTV:
AV/Reverse Repeated pressing of this button with [sic] switch between AV-C (Composite, yellow RCA) and AV-S (S-Video) inputs. Additionally, this button rewinds the CD, DVD or VCR when the component is activated with the remote control.
Of course, some of us prefer the luxury of a dedicated DVD rewinder. Permalink to this item (posted at 6:24 AM)
8 June 2007
It's time to play Guess the Format
The sale of ABC Radio to Citadel is scheduled to close next week, and the FCC approved the deal on condition that Citadel spin off eleven radio stations. Two of them are in this market: KKWD (Wild 104.9) and KINB (La Indomable 105.3). The stations will be transferred to something called "The Last Bastion Station Trust," headed by Elliott Evers, and Mr Evers has been given his marching orders [link goes to a Microsoft Word file] as follows:
We [the FCC] will impose a condition requiring that Citadel Broadcasting's divestiture of the 11 stations to LBST pursuant to the Trust Application occur prior to or simultaneously with the consummation of Citadel Broadcasting's transfer of control. LBST is strongly encouraged to take reasonable steps to market the stations to any "eligible entity," which often includes businesses owned by women and minorities. LBST is further encouraged to consummate the sale of all of the stations within six months of the consummation date. If LBST is unable to do so, it must provide the Commission with a copy of the confidential report referenced in Section 4(g) of the Form of Trust Agreement submitted with the Trust Application. With that condition in place, we find that the proposed merger transaction complies with the Act and the Rules and serves the public interest, convenience, and necessity.
Not incidentally, the transfer will eliminate the need for Citadel's ongoing waiver of market-concentration rules to continue to operate Chisholm Trail Broadcasting's KQOB (Bob FM 96.9) under a local-marketing agreement. So what happens to these two smallish stations? (And now you know why the Sports Animal was moved from 104.9 to 97.9, swapping with Wild, some months back.) Nothing, at first; but sooner or later, Evers is going to have to find buyers, and those buyers may not wish to maintain the existing formats, especially since both stations fall well into the bottom half of the local ratings. In the meantime, if you're a minority or a female (or both), you are encouraged "strongly," yet to put in a bid. Permalink to this item (posted at 11:46 AM)
19 June 2007
High weirdness at WKY
I'm getting a fair amount of traffic looking for information on the WKY countdown, which isn't really referenced here. I found this tidbit at Wikipedia:
WKY has broadcast a computerized countdown as a lead-in to its impending format change. The countdown was originally calibrated to introduce the new format as of 9:00 a.m. CDT on Monday, June 18, 2007. However, the countdown has since been re-calibrated to end on 9:00 a.m. CDT, Wednesday, June 20, 2007. The countdown consists of the words "T-minus _____ days, _____ hours, _____ minutes, _____ seconds, and counting," and followed every fourth iteration by some trivial comment, such as "How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop?" Other trivial comments typically consist of movie quotes or popular song lyrics.
Station representatives have declined to comment on the future format of the radio station. Nothing too weird, but then this follows:
Meanwhile, this countdown has caused a small hysteria in Lawton, OK some 90 miles southwest of Oklahoma City. Rumors abound, speculating that the person responsible for the countdown is in Lawton and means to harm either the city of Lawton or Lauren Nelson who makes her home there. Some have reported the FBI are in town searching for the radio station's base, also presumed to be in Lawton.
Chain, meet puller. Update, 3:40 pm: Received via email forward:
you may want to turn your radio onto 930 WKY AM. there is a guy that is counting down to a point which will end at 9 a.m. tomorrow morning. he's been doing this non-stop for at least 24 hours. obviously, he's hacked into the radio station, and the FBI (fat boys institute) has been trying to find him since friday. he throws in a one-liner every 30 seconds or so. wierd!
Chain successfully pulled. (We've had pirates before, and they were nabbed a lot quicker.) Update, 9 am, 20 June: Dead silence for about fifteen seconds, and then "Nothing bad is going to happen" from Mayor Cornett. What we have here is a non-Sports Animal sports station. Whoop-de-freaking-doo. Permalink to this item (posted at 11:33 AM)
22 June 2007
I've heard better ideas
La Shawn Barber eviscerates that mostly-silly study which calls for Serious Action to counteract all those awful right-wing radio shows that I make a point of not listening to. (She's posted a PDF copy of it here.) For the most part, I agree with her conclusions: the left is trying to gain by governmental means what it likely could never obtain in an actual free marketplace. But this invites the question: is broadcast radio truly a free marketplace? Certainly the FCC won't stop you from putting up a station of your own provided there's an open allocation, which there probably isn't. (You might be able to wangle an LPFM license, maybe; I can't, at least from where I live, as there are no open channels.) In 1996, Section 202 of the Telecommunications Act established a sliding scale for how many stations an individual entity could operate in a given market: in the largest markets, up to eight stations can be under common ownership. We've had eleven years of this now, and can anyone actually say that radio is better today? It certainly isn't more profitable: Clear Channel, arguably the Wal-Mart of the industry, went private last year and sold off 30 percent of its stations after a succession of bad quarters. Disney unloaded ABC Radio onto Citadel, who had to unload 11 stations to comply with the Feds. CBS sold ten stations last year. None of this feverish station-trading changed the general sound of things very much. That said, though, I have a philosophical bias in favor of more players rather than fewer, and the two think tanks who produced that study proposed a change in the cap laws which I don't think would be particularly unreasonable. They recommend a 5-percent cap nationwide no single entity can own or control more than 5 percent of the total number of AM and FM stations (do LPFMs and translators count?) and a reduced cap in individual markets: four in the largest (45 stations and up), three in the next group (30-44), then two, finally one in stations with 14 stations or fewer. Actually counting the stations might prove problematic: Radio-Locator.com lists 47 in and around Oklahoma City, but some of them are clearly duplicates (for instance, KGOU/KROU, or KQCV-FM and its two translators, or the Sports Animal AM/FM pair). I'm thinking we'd fall into the 30-44 group, in which case the local cap would be three. Almost a dozen stations would be up for grabs. There is of course no guarantee that things would suck less; theoretically, they could get worse. But I'm old enough to remember the old 7-7-7 rule: until 1985, you could own a total of 14 radio stations seven AM, seven FM and seven TV stations, no more than five of which could be on the VHF band. Now maybe that's too few for contemporary conditions; but until I see some evidence that ownership of truly huge segments of spectrum actually produces some benefits other than dubious economies of scale, I'm going to continue to believe that the way it was is better than the way it is. Update, 2 pm: As of yesterday (when I wrote this piece) there is something called the Local Community Radio Act of 2007, which would loosen some of the restrictions on LPFM. Jesse Walker has the story. Permalink to this item (posted at 6:28 AM)
1 July 2007
Requiem for a format
Admittedly, that's a tad misleading, since the format isn't actually dead. On the other hand, it seems like every year a commercial station that used to play classical music starts playing something else. In Milwaukee, that "something else" is ersatz jazz:
In the city of Milwaukee's second radio format change in a week, WFMR-FM (106.9) is dumping classical music in favor of the "smooth jazz" that WJZI-FM (93.3) dropped last week.
The move marks a return to the smooth jazz format that the station now known as WFMR said it pioneered in the mid-1990s. The station hit the air in 1995 with a playlist that included David Sanborn, George Benson, Kenny G and Al Jarreau, all of whom will be featured again at the station. This is news you wouldn't even tell Tchaikovsky. Two observations:
I should note that there was a brief period when you could tune in "smooth jazz" in Oklahoma City; it was on my first group of presets at the time, although I reserved the right to push the next button at the first sign of the strangled-duck noises made by Kenny G. I wouldn't mind if it returned, subject to the same provisions. And anyway, our classical station, noncommercial as it is, isn't going anywhere. (Via triticale.) Permalink to this item (posted at 12:50 PM)
7 July 2007
Alternate title
In the summer of 2005, Jack FM came to New York, and Michele said this:
I never thought I'd be saddened over the loss of a radio station, especially one I rarely listened to anymore I've been angry and pissed off and cynical every time a station I like changed formats, but I've never been so sad to see something go.
I wonder what she'll say when it comes back:
New York is getting its oldies station back. WCBS-FM will return to the oldies format sometime next week, according to an industry insider with knowledge of the decision. A spokeswoman for the station's operator, CBS Radio, declined to comment.
And it's not hard to see why:
Jack's ratings plummeted to a 1.5 share of listeners from the 3.9 share the oldies format had. In the most recent Arbitron survey, 101.1 had a 2.2 share. The move to Jack also hurt ad billings. Revenue for 101.1 plunged 31% in 2006, to $16.1 million, according to BIA Financial Network.
Explanation of title: "Alternate Title" was a record by the Monkees. In the US, it was titled "Randy Scouse Git", but this probably would not have gone over well among some of the snivelling little rat-faced gits in the UK, hence the "Alternate Title." And frankly, I had no reason to believe anyone would think kindly of the first title I'd chosen for this piece, which was "Jack off next week in NYC." Permalink to this item (posted at 3:30 PM)
2 August 2007
Talk of the townsfolk
Will there be an attempt to restore the old-and-busted Fairness Doctrine for broadcast media? Not if Air America's Thom Hartmann has anything to say about it:
The "progressive has failed" frame is simply wrong. In just three short years, our format has gone from a small handful of progressive stations to 10% of the talk radio content of this country. If I'd started a soda pop business in my garage and in three years had taken 10% of Coca-Cola's market, my picture would be on the cover of Forbes! Nobody thinks of Apple as a failure, but they only have 4.8% of the U.S. computer market, and that's taken them 20 years! What if a new music format had taken 10% of the radio market in just three years? Everybody would be talking about it, it'd be moving onto bigger and bigger sticks, and programmers would be figuring out how to clone it in every local market across the country! Conservative Talk radio didn't catch on instantly, either. We don't need no stinkin' Fairness Doctrine, and we don't need to be lectured by failing talk show hosts. We just need a few more industry pros to take seriously the very real accomplishments and the ongoing potential of this format as it matures. Add to that a few shots at bigger sticks [industry jargon for radio towers], dedicated sales forces, and decent imaging and promotion, and maybe we'll be 20% within the next three years!"
There are a couple of things askew here Apple, once upon a time, had a market share far greater than 4.8 percent, and 10 percent of the content does not necessarily equal 10 percent of the audience but otherwise Hartmann's nailed it. New formats do not flourish overnight. But should they catch on in a few major markets, others will take notice. (Jack FM was on in Canada for a year and a half before any US station picked it up.) And the competition? There is that panoply of right-wing commentators, but perhaps the biggest threat to commercial "progressive" broadcasting is good ol' National Public Radio, a reliably left-wing bunch, firmly entrenched, pretty much ubiquitous, and known to receive actual checks from some of us center-right types. It goes without saying, though, that there are people for whom NPR is insufficiently leftish. I can see one other possible snag: old-time radio guys, a lot of whom are still around, hear the word "progressive" and think it's the old FM album-rock format from the 1970s. Ultimately it may be necessary to coin another term. What is not necessary, of course, is any sort of government action. Permalink to this item (posted at 5:14 PM)
26 August 2007
The great channel shuffle
I've been reading over the FCC's "final" DTV assignments, for use in the brave new post-analog world of television beginning in February 2009, which were issued earlier this month, and in Oklahoma, at least, there are few surprises. The following channels are assigned to Oklahoma City: 7, 9, 13, 15, 24, 27, 33, 40, 50 and 51. Shawnee gets channel 29, Norman channel 46. (The Norman station, KOCM, has no digital signal presently; it will begin digital broadcasts on the day of the Big Switch.) One thing that strikes me as odd is the assignment of both channels 8 and 10 to Tulsa. KTUL, analog channel 8, currently broadcasts in digital on channel 10; I suppose they're keeping 8 open in case there is an issue with KOED, the Tulsa OETA station, which is going back to channel 11. OETA had apparently requested an increase in antenna height for KOED, which the FCC said would increase potential interference to KTUL on channel 10. There will be no low-band VHF stations (channels 2 through 6) in Oklahoma after the transition, and very few nationwide. One reason, perhaps, is the possibility of interference caused by household electrical equipment, making reception on those channels more problematic. What's more, contemporary antennas (remember those?) tend to work better on high-band VHF (7 through 13) and UHF (14-up) channels. The effect this will have on cable channel assignments is unclear, at least to me, but then digital reception over cable baffles me anyway. OETA runs four digital channels in the city, at 14.1, 14.2, 14.3 and 14.4; on Cox Digital Cable they're on 111, 112, 113 and 114. If you don't have digital cable, as I don't, but you do have a QAM tuner, as I do, you'll find them at 110-111, 102-112, 105-113 and 105-114. (OETA HD, which apparently is available on cable more often than it is over the air, shows up here at 106-713.) Life would be simpler, I suppose, with an actual set-top box, but I resist that sort of thing. Permalink to this item (posted at 8:52 AM)
2 September 2007
Out to sea
I did one actual Vent (#541) during World Tour '07, and one paragraph therefrom has come back to haunt me:
Commercial radio is in a sadder state than I thought. One of the few things I've heard that was at all worthwhile was a program by Jim "The Critic" Voight on Charleston's WAVF ("96 Wave") on Sunday morning. The Critic's choices were interesting enough; more to the point, he was willing to defend them against potential audience complaints. Then again, this was a Sunday-morning show, and nothing in the station's regular playlist makes me think that this is anything other than a weekend anomaly, and that the station normally doesn't sound like that at all. (In their defense, it's better than anything I'm likely to hear on Oklahoma City radio.)
And now 96 Wave is history. From Lou Pickney's VarietyHits.com:
Heritage rock station 96 Wave (96.1 WAVF) in Charleston, SC abruptly dropped modern rock (and, presumably, the incumbent "Free Beer and Hot Wings" syndicated morning show) at 5:00 p.m. EDT on Friday 8/31/2007 to go Variety Hits as 96.1 Chuck FM. The station is streaming live as of this writing from the old 96 Wave website.
In its 22+ year existence, 96 Wave maintained a rock format. WAVF signed on with an Album Oriented Rock format in March 1985 as 96 Wave following a week of stunting with ocean wave sounds. With the alternative rock format that swept the United States in the early 1990s, the station shifted from the dying AOR format to the growing alternative (also known as modern rock) format in 1993, though it kept the established 96 Wave name. The last song played on 96 Wave prior to the flip was "My Wave" by Soundgarden. The first song played on Chuck FM was "Take This Job And Shove It" by Johnny Paycheck. According to radio-online.com, 96 Wave program director Lance Hale will remain with the new station in the same role. What's weird about this is that Chuck FM will apparently be leaving Chucktown:
[T]he station is slated to change its city of license from Hanahan, SC [in Berkeley County just beyond North Charleston] to Forestbrook, SC and drop its massive class C signal (100,000 watts from a height of 1777') to go to a C2 status at 26,000 watts from a height of only 492', and in the process lose its coverage of Charleston (moving to cover the Myrtle Beach, SC market).
Pickney speculates that this is a temporary move while a multiplicity of stations are shuffled, and the result will be something like this:
My guess: the 96.1 Chuck FM format will end up on on 101.7 (with the WKZQ-FM [Myrtle Beach] rock format moving to 96.1 FM when the switch happens), as Apex [owner of WAVF] will get the 101.7 license and NextMedia will obtain 96.1 after the swap. It is more complex than that, but for the purpose of analyzing the move, it suffices.
Who loses in this shuffle? Bamberg's WWBD is moving from that city to the Isle of Palms, east of Charleston, about 90 miles away, but, says its owner, Bamberg/Orangeburg loses nothing in the deal:
Harold Miller, Miller Communications president and CEO, said the transition is aimed at improving the company's and other radio broadcasters' and groups' facilities and stations.
"If approved, in time Miller will reach an opportunity to dramatically improve several of its stations," Miller said. "The Bad Dog format will not leave Orangeburg. Miller Communications would be foolish to remove a format that the people have demanded be there. There are no plans to take Bad Dog out of Orangeburg." Which suggests to me that WNKT St George, which is moving to Eastover in this deal, presumably close enough to Orangeburg, will take over the Bad Dog format. Definitely a change from Cat Country. On the other hand, I have to agree with former WWBD owner Vic Whetstone:
"It is not my baby anymore, but it was my baby," Whetstone said. "Me and my staff, we operated a community station. We were so much a part of the community and promoting so many things. Unfortunately, this is not the way it is anymore."
As I wrote in Vent #103 in 1998:
What do Pryor, Henryetta, Okmulgee and Muskogee have in common? Yes, they're all towns in Oklahoma, but more specifically, they are towns in Oklahoma who used to have local FM service. Oh, the stations are still there, sort of. But the owners, visions of bigger bucks dancing in their heads, relocated the transmitting facilities to be closer to the Tulsa metropolitan area, where they could go after big-city audiences while still paying lip service to the communities to which they are licensed.
If anything, this process seems to have accelerated in the nine years since. Permalink to this item (posted at 3:14 PM)
4 September 2007
Obviously this isn't Sirius
XM satellite radio sends an email to a subscriber:
Starting September 1st and continuing on Saturdays through late November, we may preempt certain news, talk, and entertainment channels so that we can air select college football games. The channels subject to preemption include Air America, The Weather Channel and America Right.
Subscriber notes:
Someone obviously has made some very careful programming decisions in an attempt to be fair. Unfortunately, knowing human nature, they'll succeed only in ticking off just about everybody: liberals (Air America), conservatives (America Right), and everyone else (The Weather Channel). But you have to give 'em credit for the symmetry.
I think I'll go stuff a few more tunes onto my Walkman. Permalink to this item (posted at 7:12 PM)
13 September 2007
Perry presses ahead
Russell M. Perry's radio empire has expanded into Georgia: the Oklahoma City-based broadcaster has acquired five stations in the Augusta, Georgia area from Radio One. True to form, Perry is going with what's worked for him in Oklahoma:
"Augusta [is] the second-largest city in the state of Georgia with a population that is about 40 to 45 percent African-Americans, and the stations I bought are gospel, hip-hip and R&B. We will change one of them to country and western."
Perry's six-station Duncan/Lawton cluster runs six different formats, including country station KKEN. Apparently Perry won't be able to use the "Blazin' Hip-Hop and R&B" imaging from KVSP Anadarko/Oklahoma City in Georgia: Clear Channel is already using it on their urban-formatted outlet. Radio One, which has had a rough year, owns 55 stations in 18 cities plus Giant magazine; Perry is paying them $3.1 million for the Augusta cluster. Permalink to this item (posted at 7:20 AM)
26 September 2007
The din of iBiquity
The Oklahoman's Jim Stafford wonders if maybe the time has come for HD Radio:
In Oklahoma, there are 23 stations broadcasting 38 HD radio channels with six more coming soon. And the iBiquity Digital Corp., the developer of digital HD Radio technology, recently said that the 1,500th HD Radio station has gone on the air: Clear Channel’s rock station WROV-FM 96.3 in Roanoke, Va.
Maybe HD radio has finally reached the tipping point. Maybe so. I haven't found any compelling reason to try it out. (Here's a list of what's out there; a perfunctory glance at the listings suggests that Tulsa stations have embraced the possibilities more than Oklahoma City stations have, which doesn't surprise me; Tulsa, as a radio market, has always struck me as slightly less hidebound than Oklahoma City.) If you've played with HD Radio, I'd be interested to hear what you think about it. Permalink to this item (posted at 6:53 AM)
14 October 2007
At the left end of the dial
I'm thinking Dean's a bit conflicted about National Public Radio:
I am confused as to why NPR exists.
I love NPR. I really do. Get in my car on any given morning, and it's tuned to the local NPR station. You'd have to be an idiot not to notice that they're left-wing biased, but, the quality of what they put out is extraordinary. I'm glad they're there, and I've given them money. Still, let's tell the truth about NPR: pasty-white to semi-tan mid-to-upper class white people going on and on how important they are and how their cultural perspective is vital because they're "non-profit." Meanwhile, look at who really listens to them, and what they're all about. This really demands taxpayer subsidy, eh? It occurs to me that if they do put out stuff of extraordinary quality, their perceived pastiness and/or self-importance should become secondary considerations at best. The taxpayer-subsidy argument carries a bit more heft, especially in Oklahoma, where two of the top three NPR outlets are operated by state universities. (The third, Tulsa's KWGS, is operated by the private University of Tulsa.) In other areas, stations might be operated by private foundations. Pretty much all of them, though, draw some sort of funding from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting in fact, far more than does NPR itself. The station closest to this desk, KGOU (which, perhaps ironically, is located at the right end of the dial), gets maybe ten percent of its budget from CPB. In 2003, Doc Searls suggested that it was time to get off the CPB dole:
Turn to listeners and viewers. Operate in the real marketplace. You already have a huge advantage over commercial broadcasters, thanks to the fact that your listeners and viewers are customers and not just "consumers."
At the time, I, perhaps prematurely, predicted the death of CPB:
Ultimately, I think Congress will kill the Corporation for Public Broadcasting; the right wing will present the death of CPB as an ideological triumph, of course, but CPB needs to go, not because it might offend a segment of the population, but because it's an anachronism, and one which adds (albeit only slightly) to the ongoing budget deficits at that. While public radio isn't exactly awash in money, they've learned how to turn a buck just like their rivals on the commercial side of things.
And the slack, I predict with somewhat greater assurance, will be taken up by the likes of Dean, and me, and Jennifer and Ted Stanley. Permalink to this item (posted at 12:22 PM)
2 November 2007
Note to self: avoid paperwork
In the current radio ratings, Spanish-language station KTUZ-FM dropped from a 4.2 share to a 2.4, and management says it's because of HB 1804:
Tyler Media market manager Skip Stow blamed KTUZ's decline on Oklahoma's new immigration law.
"They're scared," Stow said, referring to some listeners in the Latino community. "They don't want to fill out anything official looking." Interestingly, Tyler has a billboard around town (I saw it along I-35 near NE 63rd) proclaiming that the local Latino market is 300,000 strong and "we reach them all!" Permalink to this item (posted at 2:18 PM)
30 December 2007
No scheduling conflict here
Atheist Talk will debut on KTNF, Air America Minnesota, at 9 am Central on the thirteenth of January. Which is, by sheerest coincidence, a Sunday. (Via Saint Paul.) Permalink to this item (posted at 5:06 PM)
6 January 2008
More schlock, less talk
A radio horror story that somehow made me smile:
I worked for a beautiful music station that [ranked] dead last in the market and the operators were convinced that no one listened including the advertisers. It wasn't a Bonneville or Schulke station.
We decided to prove the point by playing the same 2 half hour reel to reel tapes until someone called to complain. It went on for months and finally after 11 weeks someone called in to ask if we just played that same song yesterday. It played every hour for weeks! (Note: Bonneville and Schulke/SRP were major syndicators of "beautiful-music" formats, which have largely fallen by the wayside these days.) Permalink to this item (posted at 8:49 AM)
12 January 2008
Bye, bye, Buzz
For the last 27 hours or so, KHBZ-FM (94.7 / The Buzz) has been playing Metallica nonstop (except for commercials) and warning of something happening Monday morning at 10 am. The rumor machine is running flat-out, and at this moment someone on Wikipedia has floated the possibility of a Spanish format or of KTOK-FM. I tend to doubt either of these, but then the format change I predicted for the first of the year at KQOB-FM (96.9 / Bob FM) didn't happen, so I figure I have no reason to think I'm actually correct. Update, 10 am, Monday morning: Big deal. I don't remember anyone in town saying "You know, I really like the KATT. In fact, I like them so much I think every station should try to sound like the KATT." Permalink to this item (posted at 8:40 PM)
15 January 2008
Ninety-four point shabby
The Lost Ogle's take on the KHBZ format change:
I'd like to thank the powers-at-be at the Buzz for making a completely idiotic decision and (instead of bringing Indie Rock back to Oklahoma City radio) deciding to compete with one of Oklahoma City's (like it or not) few radio institutions, The KATT. And the reason I'd like to thank them is because I like to see incompetent people get fired, and hopefully these buffoons will get fired pretty soon.
Seriously, imagine how great it would be if instead of throwing out AC/DC, Korn and Atreyu, we were greeted by even mainstream indie rock like The Flaming Lips, The Arcade Fire, Band of Horses, or dear god, even Interpol. Imagine the "Buzz" (eh) that would have created. But no, we get to hear as an OklahomaRock commenter perfectly labeled it more MethRock. (Disclosure: I actually bought a Korn track this week off iTunes.) Permalink to this item (posted at 3:02 PM)
19 January 2008
Some things considered
This month, the University of Oklahoma's KGOU marks twenty-five years in Public Radio, and this story seems telling:
Ken Stern, chief executive of National Public Radio, told OU students Friday that when NPR opened its first foreign bureau in London in 1982, CBS had about two dozen.
"To tell you how things have changed," he said, "we opened our 18th in Kabul (Afghanistan) last year and CBS is down to two." I bet CBS still has a bigger motor pool, though:
"We have a minivan in Washington and two armored cars in Baghdad," [Stern] said. "That is our fleet of vehicles."
And maybe once in a while Cory Flintoff and Diane Rehm will carpool. Permalink to this item (posted at 9:05 AM)
25 January 2008
It was too much to hope for
The Federal Communications Commission has given its blessing [link goes to PDF file] to the sale of Clear Channel's radio stations to private-equity firms, provided they spin off at least 48 stations in 42 markets. As with the ABC/Citadel merger, the licenses for the stations to be sold will be assigned to a trust in this case, the Aloha Station Trust LLC pending disposal. The first thing I did, of course, was to see if any Oklahoma radio stations will be sold as a result of the FCC action. The answer is no. (The list begins on page 41 of that PDF file linked above.) However, another condition for the sale is the closing of a separate deal for Clear Channel's television stations, which include KOKI-TV and KMYT-TV in Tulsa. Permalink to this item (posted at 7:56 PM)
8 February 2008
Citadel please note
And that goes for you too, Clear Channel. Learn from this:
When digital radio station Oneword closed last month, it seemed that things couldn't get any worse for the broadcaster. But indeed they could. Gallingly, the temporary replacement on the old Oneword channel a 1992 recording of birdsong, played on a loop is causing more of a stir than its predecessor ever managed, with tens of thousands of listeners flocking to it.
It's got to be better than Bob & Tom & Lex & Terry & any of those other morning-program jerkwads. (Via Fark.) Permalink to this item (posted at 10:17 AM)
10 February 2008
"Playing what we want," indeed
If that particular bit of radio-format imaging struck you as just a hair authoritarian, you're ready for this: Jack FM in Russian. Why, yes, they do stream. Here's what Sean Ross heard:
Only about four songs an hour are in English and there are definitely some '80s-sounding Russian music, but there's also a lot of traditional sounding balladry and a lot of more generic pop/rock that is hard to place in any particular decade. The English language songs I heard in my first half hour were Whitney Houston's "I Will Always Love You" and Bryan Ferry's "Slave To Love."
The first track I recognized was Blondie's "Call Me", followed not too closely by Tina Turner's "Private Dancer." Very Jack-ish. If you're actually in Russia, you can hear the station on 89.9 in Moscow and on 91.1 in St. Petersburg. Permalink to this item (posted at 1:18 PM)
13 February 2008
A little DAB'll do ya
Suddenly I don't feel so bad about not spending any money on HD Radio. Look what's (not) happening in Britain:
The whispers of discontent began after Richard Wheatley, ceo of The Local Radio Company compared the DAB platform to Betamax the video format that lost out to VHS in the 80's.
This seems a curious analogy as it’s not like there's a rival digital service or that DAB is especially superior in audio when compared to existing FM services quality (despite the hype, it's often not). Mr Wheatley is correct when he mixes metaphors and says that despite a rapid original adoption rate for DAB radio purchases and falling prices of DAB sets the platform has failed to build a greater adoption and has no 'killer application' by which he means no 'must listen' digital only radio station that would help drive current non DAB radio owners to rush out and buy a DAB set. There's certainly nothing compelling on HD. (Aside: This is another case where we're using a "standard" that isn't really standard anywhere else; HD Radio has been adopted only in the US and Brazil.) But there are other reasons to avoid buying a DAB set:
So restrictive was the technology that the DAB platform has already decided to slowly scrap the broadcast format currently employed and migrate to a new DAB+ format which would allow a higher quality broadcast signal to fit in a much smaller slice of the bandwidth pie. This would use the AAC+ audio format which I often use to post audio files on this blog for dial-up of bandwidth restricted users. This would mean that existing DAB radio owners would need to purchase new sets or own a rare upgradeable set already.
I guess the good thing is that so few people have bought DAB sets that the idea of changing the whole platform hasn't caused wailing and gnashing of teeth and threats of litigation. Permalink to this item (posted at 2:06 PM)
14 February 2008
The radio station from hell
This is the derisive term I use for my iTunes installation at work, which includes about 2500 tracks at the moment. Usually when you walk in, it will be playing something you don't like, hence the description. While inevitably the playlist reflects my highly-dubious sense of aesthetics, it certainly qualifies as eclectic: you will find therein, for instance, two actual 1910 Fruitgum Company tracks, and the entirety of Kind of Blue. I won't, however, argue that this somehow represents "the full spectrum of music," unlike a certain Kansas City radio station:
Even the most casual music fan can't fail to notice that the full spectrum of music even if we limit ourselves to the rock and roll era; hell, even if we limit ourselves to the post-Beatles/Dylan rock era would necessarily include not only music from the 70s, 80s, 90s and now but from at least the 60s and probably the 50s, as well.
I don't have a lot of Nineties stuff, but I'm working on it. Of course, you might not really want a "full-spectrum" station:
I'm not sure even I would really want a station to play the FULL spectrum of music, mixing in Mozart, Gregorian chants, and the Barney soundtrack along with the obvious rock staples. Maybe nobody does, really. The type of music we listen to, and the type we make it a point to let others know that we don't listen to, is one of the ways we express our identities to the world, a way we signal to others that we are this kind of person and not (horrors!) that kind. What we usually downplay as merely personal aesthetics always come with loads of political implications. We had to learn to like what we like, after all, and these self-segregating lessons naturally mirror a society already segregated by race and class.
I'm wondering where this leaves me, since those 2500 tracks contain, for instance, lots of R&B and not a whole lot of classical. Not that I have any business pretending to have either erudition or street cred. (Nor, for that matter, do I really want to segue Britten's Simple Symphony into Funkadelic's "Cosmic Slop.") Still, I wonder what sort of radio show, or podcast, I could whip up out of that odd collection of ingredients, and whether more than one person could stand to listen to it for more than a couple of selections. Permalink to this item (posted at 10:43 AM)
11 March 2008
No woman, no ratings
Rich Appel's Hz So Good newsletter contains the following tidbit of Scary Information:
Emmis [is] launching a third Rock FM in the Apple. I believe the last time that occurred, the third Rock FM was "The Apple." Two words here, and you faithful pains should already know what they are: Marley Curse. I'm watching this one closely, because if 'RXP fails, it will be the 4th NYC radio station in the past nine-or-so years to do so which, during its tenure, was the only NYC radio station to play Bob Marley. The Buzz played him, they're gone. Blink? Gone. Jack? Gone. I tell you, Marley is bad luck. If I were running a commercial FM, I'd ahem dread playing him. Apparently Legend was meant to be enjoyed privately. Don't ask me why.
I'm wondering if perhaps this explains the general stability of the Oklahoma City radio market: you couldn't get these guys to play a reggae record if Jamaica became the 52nd state. Permalink to this item (posted at 8:16 PM)
9 April 2008
QAMmed together
A reader asked for the QAM channels in Oklahoma City. I posted these once to a QAM wiki, but it seems to have disappeared, and there have been changes anyway, so here we go: 69-25 KOKH-HD (Fox) 69-34 KOCB-HD (The CW) 72-9 KSBI-DT 72-24 KOCM-DT (Daystar) 73-3 KFOR-DT (NBC) 73-5 KTUZ-DT (Telemundo) 73-8 KOCO-DT (ABC) 73-10 KWTV-DT (CBS) 73-11 KOCB-DT (The CW) 73-12 KOKH-DT (Fox) 73-16 KAUT-DT (MyNetwork TV) 73-17 KOPX-DT (i) 73-19 C-SPAN2 73-68 C-SPAN 83-100 KOHC-DT (Azteca) 84-4 KFOR-HD (NBC) 84-5 KOCO-HD (ABC) 84-222 KOCO Weather 88-7 Cox Channel 88-14 KETA-DT (PBS) 94-22 GoScout Homes 98-4 TV Guide Channel 98-13 QVC 98-18 OKC-ETC 98-20 City Channel 20 98-21 Univision Oklahoma 98-23 KTBO-DT (Trinity) 98-69 HSN 98-116 Jewelry TV 98-118 ONTV4U 98-119 TV Superstore 101-70 Superstation WGN 101-71 GoScout Autos 101-910 ShopNBC 102-112 OETA Okla 105-113 OETA Create 105-114 OETA Kids 106-9 KWTV-HD (CBS) 106-13 OETA HD 109-59 NBC Weather Plus These are subject to change without notice. If my channel scan didn't pick it up, it's not here; additions and supplemental information will be welcomed. Update, 10 May: All the HD channels seem to have vanished, but no: they've simply moved around a bit. I had an explanation for this earlier, but it didn't seem to correspond to the facts. Permalink to this item (posted at 7:27 PM)
9 May 2008
Okay, you program this
The struggling CW network will turn over its Sunday prime-time programming to Media Rights Capital, which will produce two new dramas (presumably at 8 and 9 Eastern) and two comedies (presumably at 7 and 7:30). MRC is run by Mordecai Wiczyk and Asif Satchu: they financed, among other things, the 2007 remake of Sleuth, which was released through Sony Pictures Classics, and the upcoming Sacha Baron Cohen project, which may or may not be called Brüno: Delicious Journeys Through America for the Purpose of Making Heterosexual Males Visibly Uncomfortable in the Presence of a Gay Foreigner in a Mesh T-Shirt. Permalink to this item (posted at 8:38 PM)
|
These archives begin 6 September 2006. For items beginning in August 2002, click here and select the desired category.
Click the Permalink on an individual entry to read comments and TrackBacks if any. |