|
20 September 2006
Remind me to set up an autoresponder
Some people wind up in their dream jobs. I am not one of them. However, no matter how much I might be annoyed by what I have to do to earn my keep, and sometimes I wish they'd import a sackful of Iranian mullahs to work in there for a week put the fear of God into them, it would I am eternally grateful that I don't have to deal with And maybe I can strike that <strike> tag:
it seems to me that the ability to be anonymous on the net has caused people to become much ruder. i work in customer service. most of my interaction is based via e-mail correspondence. people leave comments on our site when they like something, don’t like something, or can’t find something.
but instead of being specific about what they were doing or what they were trying to find, they say things like "you guys are idiots". From there, it descends to "you suck," and farther.
what makes people think that this is okay? seriously? do they not think real people read these things? do they not care? how do they think this is going to help them get the answers they seek?
Mere answers won't give them the satisfaction they desire. I didn't invent this technique, but I recommend it highly. Write back to the offender with the following piece of boilerplate:
Dear Sir or Madam:
I regret to inform you that you may have been a victim of identity theft. The following correspondence was received with your name attached: [paste copy of offending email] Identity theft is something we take very seriously today, and I wish you good luck in finding the dishonest, conniving asshole who sent that. Sincerely, ... Even if it doesn't work, you'll feel better. Permalink to this item (posted at 7:19 AM)
22 September 2006
Bumper mulch
A Roseburg, Oregon woman was injured when she crashed her 1971 riding mower into a parked van this week. In addition to suffering a broken leg, Kirstina Burkhart was written up by police for careless driving and driving without insurance. Two questions:
(Via Fark.com.) Permalink to this item (posted at 11:21 AM)
6 October 2006
This guy handles a mean pan
A well-known local vagrant, who looks very much like a marinated walnut, sitting on the pavement in front of Subway, where he traditionally hits people up for money, taking time out from begging to have a conversation on his cell phone about getting his hot water heater fixed.
Sounds like the troll who hangs around under the Belle Isle Bridge. Permalink to this item (posted at 3:55 PM)
21 November 2006
Jacking point
Notice: This is not the approved method for towing. Well, maybe for a Volvo. Permalink to this item (posted at 4:01 PM)
7 December 2006
When you change lanes, the baby Jesus cries
I link to this purely for its amusement value, and there's plenty of it, what with the bald assertion that there have been "460,000 Additional Motor Vehicle Fatalities Since US Supreme Court Banned School Prayer in 1963." (There's even a graph, just in case you had any doubt.) Then again, that's a side issue: what this fellow really wants is to get people who shouldn't be driving off the roads entirely. On the face of it, this isn't a bad idea, until you look at the people he thinks shouldn't be driving:
Jalopnik linked to this drivel because, they said:
We ... hope 100,000 sets of Jalopnik eyeballs blow the hell out of the bandwidth on his puny, $3.99 server.
And, well, the least I can do is to help. Permalink to this item (posted at 6:26 PM)
14 December 2006
Current trends in domestic violence
When you're eight years old, you can build a fort and put a "No Gurls Aloud" sign over the entrance. This isn't quite so impressive when you're forty-four:
A 44-year-old Elkins [AR] man was arrested Monday in connection with domestic battery and installing a booby trap in his home which shocked a woman, according to a police report.
[O]fficers found electrical fencing, used to keep livestock pinned in, installed on a bedroom doorknob which shocked the woman as she attempted to enter the room. The fencing was about 110 volts which was hooked to the doorknob by a wire hanger. The woman wasn't seriously injured from the shock but she also had a lump on her forehead. I'm assuming this isn't the guy who wrote this. Permalink to this item (posted at 1:22 PM)
28 February 2007
Note to another department
Let me know when you can redo something that I messed up, okay? Oh, you can't? Why am I not surprised? Addendum: And while we're at it, a note to a (let us hope) soon-to-be-ex-customer: How the hell do we know whether you used the "right" credit card or not? Do I look like the Amazing Fargin' Kreskin? And to think people get exercised over Al Gore's electric bill. Permalink to this item (posted at 1:39 PM)
2 March 2007
Home of the Reek Squad
And some weasels, apparently:
Have you ever found a deal at Best Buy's website only to travel to the store and find that the "sale" is over? Did the Best Buy employee show you "proof" on their "website"? It now seems that there are really TWO websites, and they're identical except for the prices. Here's the deal:
In the wake of an investigation launched by the Connecticut Attorney General's office, Best Buy has finally admitted that the now-infamous "secret intranet" (used to mislead in-store customers about BestBuy's online prices) exists. The website looks identical to BestBuy.com ... except for the prices.
The secret website was first revealed by George Gombossy of the Hartford Courant (Way to go, George!). While investigating a tip from a reader, George was shown the internal website. It was identical to BestBuy.com, but showed a higher price for the item he was interested in. George was misled by Best Buy employees to believe it was the "real" BestBuy.com. Eventually he found some Best Buy employees who admitted to the site's existence and even showed him how it worked. I asked a Circuit City staffer about this sort of thing, and was told that they don't have a setup like that, and what's more, sometimes their Web site has lower prices than the stores and "it really pisses off the managers." Permalink to this item (posted at 12:37 PM)
18 March 2007
I know! We'll scare some domain owners!
Not one but two faxes came in this weekend from something styling itself "Domain Registry Support," demanding a reply within 24 hours. (Cleverly, they sent the faxes 24 hours and 9 minutes apart.) Rather than type in all that crap, I'll point you to Flyte's encounter with these guys from a couple years back. They weren't impressed either:
What this company is doing certainly isn't illegal ... just misleading. They see a company's new domain registration the way street hustlers see fresh-faced teens getting off the bus in Los Angeles ... fresh meat.
Once you've registered your domain (i.e., yourdomain.com,) you'll get an official looking fax from them titled: FINAL NOTICE OF DOMAIN EXTENSION. (Ah, if only it was the final notice.) They tell you that yourdomain.us "has now become available for registration. Consequently the possibility of conflicting domain name registrations may occur." (My emphases, not theirs.) With phrases scattered throughout like: REGARDING: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY NOTIFICATION PROCESS and IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNITED STATES LEGAL CODE and "You are required to advice the notification processor of your intent to license this domain name ..." it's no wonder why it scares the bejeezuz out of many people. This is not a business plan! This is a business scam! There is no service being provided here. There's no value-added item. This is just flood insurance for the north pole. If you do want to tie up other versions of your domain, worry about .org, .net and .biz long before you worry about .us. I mean, who uses .us? Well, I have a few .us sites on Ye Olde Blogroll, but I daresay I'm not particularly worried about squatters, and the .com domain here is registered through the spring of 2011. (And yes, my Whois information is public; all else being equal, I prefer to hide in plain sight.) Permalink to this item (posted at 10:57 AM)
24 March 2007
So where's Efrem Zimbalist, Jr.?
Just received: Amy Winehouse's Back to Black, arguably the niftiest melding of Sarah Vaughan and Martha Reeves available on CD. If you actually buy the CD, though, be advised that an absurd amount of jewel-case (and disc-surface) real estate is taken up by a fatuous "FBI Warning," an attempt by the RIAA to appear badass. (As always with organizations of this size, they are at best half right.) I suppose, though, it's a good thing it's the FBI and not the CIA; you let the Agency in on this sort of thing and one day, out of the blue, your iPod playlist shows up in The New York Times. Permalink to this item (posted at 10:00 AM)
6 April 2007
Because the times demand stinky fridges
Quote of the Week contender from Pete Guthier: "You let these idiot legislators start making one thing illegal because it's connected to something else, and the next thing you know, everything is illegal." Like, for instance, sodium bicarbonate, otherwise known as baking soda:
First, the state said you must make a special trip to the pharmacy counter to buy certain cold medicines. That was to curb production of methamphetamine.
Now, a St. Louis legislator wants you to do the same thing to buy an even more common household item baking soda because it's used to make crack cocaine. Sales of cold medications containing pseudoephedrine, such as Sudafed, are strictly regulated in Missouri. Customers must show a photo ID when they buy the medicine. Pharmacists must log the names and addresses of buyers, including how much they buy. People under 18 may not buy the medicines. The sponsor of the baking soda bill, Rep. Talibdin El-Amin, D-St. Louis, said the same approach was needed for baking soda because crack cocaine is often produced by dissolving powdered cocaine in a mixture of water and baking soda. Logically, a dihydrogen-monoxide ban should be next. There's already plenty of support for it. (Via Bitter Bitch.) Permalink to this item (posted at 8:38 AM)
11 April 2007
OMG UGTBK
Someone texts Rita, and then some:
I just got this interesting text message "Think of me tonight" on my phone, with a photo attached ... of a young man wearing nothing but a strategically placed towel & a smile. Which made me crack up laughing because I have no idea who this young man is, except he's someone who obviously had the wrong number.
Another reason, I suppose, to hold on to my photo-unready phone for another few years. Permalink to this item (posted at 6:59 AM)
12 April 2007
At least they didn't charge extra
Best Buy is being sued by a San Gabriel Valley woman and her mother. It seems that the woman had ordered an in-home repair from Best Buy's Geek Squad unit; when the tech arrived, he was directed to the hardware, while the customer went off to take a shower. When she emerged from her ablutions, she found an unfamiliar cell phone in the bathroom, set to record video. The woman's younger sister came up with the idea of swiping the chip from the phone. They took it to a retailer and had it installed in another phone, where they discovered the recording of the shower scene. According to the suit, the tech tried to get the chip back from her, offering discounted services as an incentive. A couple of things bother me about this:
(Via the Consumerist.) Permalink to this item (posted at 7:30 AM)
13 April 2007
Because Hooters was too, um, classy
The ever-annoying Joe Francis has announced plans to open a chain of "Girls Gone Wild" theme restaurants. A word of advice if you're calling for reservations: don't order the crabs. (Seen at Modestly Yours.) Permalink to this item (posted at 6:59 AM)
And don't come back, now, y'heah?
Not that I have any particular reason to want to go to Renton, Washington, but if I had, it's gone now:
Ways and Means Chairwoman Margarita Prentice, D-Renton, said those who criticized the [Sonics' new arena] plan because it does not provide assurances that the team will not pull up stakes ten years from now are underestimating the strength of the region.
"Why would anybody leave here and go to Oklahoma City? Have you ever been to Oklahoma City? I have," Prentice said. No more lamb fries for you, darlin'. Permalink to this item (posted at 6:01 PM)
22 April 2007
Like hell you will
Any notion I might have had of upgrading my cell phone vanished the moment I read this:
The D. E. Shaw group, Bertelsmann Digital Media Investments, Warner Music Group and prominent media and telephony angel investors have invested $7.7 million in Emotive Communications, Inc., a media technology and services provider that has developed a real-time interactive ringtone format for 3G, 4G and VoIP services.
Emotive's flagship product, the patent-pending "Push Ringer", reverses the common ringtone model. It enables a caller to push an outgoing ringtone to the receiving phone allowing the caller, not the called person, to set the tone. The chosen Ringer is transmitted to the recipient's handset and temporarily overrides the phone's pre-set ringer. The ringers can comprise audio, video, animations, avatars or flash files. Closing the loop, if the called person likes the ringtone, the service also enables him or her to instantly buy a copy of the ringtone for his or her own phone. Emotive's Push Ringer moves beyond traditional mobile personalization by both adding value to the ringtones users purchase for their own phones and providing content recommendation and impulse-purchase opportunities to the users' friends, family and coworkers. And what's to stop some cheesy marketroid from sending out thousands of the damn things at once? The only thing worse than spam is spam you have to pay for, and air time ain't free, Bunkie. I sincerely hope these people lose every last bit of their investment, and a few million besides, and that the next time they get ideas this stupid, they put their heads in the oven. It's a far cleaner place than where they are now. (Via Engadget.) Permalink to this item (posted at 9:37 AM)
6 June 2007
Hardware wants to be free, or something
If you're planning to swipe stuff from the Home Depot, you might consider visiting the Midwest City store, which recently fired four staffers for catching thieves:
A former Home Depot employee said the company fired he [sic] and three other workers because they helped police catch several suspected shoplifters in May. Midwest City police said the men helped officers catch suspected shoplifters as they tried to run from a store with lawn equipment.
An internal memo from Home Depot outlines that associates cannot accuse, detain, chase or call the police on any customer for shoplifting. However, one of the fired employees said the company is selective in enforcing that policy. One has to assume that this is due to fear of litigation: the company presumably doesn't want to be sued by someone falsely accused. (Or, for that matter, by someone who isn't falsely accused but figures he can impress twelve people who couldn't figure out how to get out of jury duty.) The price of that fear: thieves having free run of the place, and employees catching flak for low loss-prevention scores that they're not allowed to do anything about. And it's not like there was a whole lot of doubt in this particular case:
"We saw them with the merchandise. We saw them run out of the store. I never kept my eyes off of them. Then when we asked them for a receipt, and that's when they dropped the merchandise and they kept running. One guy still had a chainsaw while he was running, and that's when the cops tackled him."
Down the street at Circuit City a few months back, a chap was reprimanded for having the temerity to pursue a couple of urchins who were trying to make off with a brace of Xbox 360s. Is there a solution to this? I don't know. I don't think anyone's quite ready for arming the entire store staff. On the other hand, a trail of dead shoplifters might have some small but measurable deterrent value. Permalink to this item (posted at 8:32 AM)
1 July 2007
Not so complicated
"Why did you shoot at us?" "You have Avril Lavigne ringtones." Permalink to this item (posted at 6:02 PM)
3 July 2007
Memo to a disgruntled customer
If you're going to blame PayPal's debit-card unit for two consecutive declines and the abuse you heaped upon our poor, unsuspecting customer-service people indicates that you are you probably ought not to use that same card again the same day. Which, by the way, was declined. Again. Permalink to this item (posted at 4:39 PM)
22 July 2007
Next: Bill Gates trademarks "BSOD"
Four inmates face new charges from their cells in [FCI] El Reno, authorities said.
Investigators have accused the men of copyrighting their names and demanding millions of dollars from El Reno prison leaders for using their names without permission. Court papers showed the inmates filed liens against the warden's property and then actually hired somebody to seize his vehicles, to change the locks on his house and to freeze his bank accounts. The inmates were identified as Russell Dean Landers, Clayton Heath Albers, Carl Ervin Batts and Barry Dean Bischof. If these guys ever get out of stir, they have lucrative careers waiting at the Recording Industry Association of America. (From Freshare via Boondoggled.) Permalink to this item (posted at 10:08 AM)
25 July 2007
At least they didn't blame global warming
Obviously no one is going to dislodge this guy and his $50 million pants from the Dumbest Farging Lawsuits Ever pantheon, but this could come close:
Three individual gasoline consumers and an Oklahoma City business have filed a lawsuit against oil companies and station owners, claiming the retailers are overcharging customers for hot fuel.
And they don't mean high-octane stuff, either:
The lawsuit centers on the fact that gasoline expands when hot, reducing the energy provided by a set volume. The expansion means more gasoline is needed at higher temperatures to produce the same energy as gasoline at lower temperatures.
One gallon of gasoline at 60 degrees produces the same energy as one gallon and 2.2 ounces at 90 degrees, the lawsuit claims. "The sellers of 'hot' motor fuel are able to pocket these billions of additional dollars in temperature-inflated profits merely because the fuel they are selling is warmer than 60 degrees Fahrenheit, and customers are ignorant of the truth," the lawsuit claims. Plaintiffs are evidently ignorant of the fact that almost all the gasoline sold in this state is stored in underground tanks, where the temperature is generally around wait for it 60 degrees Fahrenheit. The papers were filed by lawyer Jona Hefner. I wait with gleeful anticipation for the moment when the judge tells her, "If you're that worried about it, buy your goddamn gas in the morning." Permalink to this item (posted at 11:12 AM)
13 August 2007
Do they have Baptists in Minnesota?
There must be some explanation for this question:
I have some rare whiskey that's 45 years old. How can I get rid of it?
I don't think of myself as particularly creative, but I'm pretty sure I could dispose of the stuff in a non-wasteful manner. As for the religious stereotype in the title, well, we have a saying down here: if you can find four Baptists together, you can usually find a fifth. (Via Spitbull.) Permalink to this item (posted at 11:55 AM)
15 August 2007
From the "As if" files
Something called Cavalry Portfolio Services, a collection agency with delusions of grandeur, left a message on my machine today for somebody who isn't here and never has been: I assume they saw a similar name in the phone book and decided that yes, this is the woman we're looking for. And their pitch was one I hadn't heard before: "If you are not [debtor's name] you must hang up." Pause. "By continuing to listen to this call you acknowledge that you are in fact [debtor's name]." On the off-chance that they might Google themselves: Dear Cavalry: By reading this article you acknowledge that (1) you are complete and utter tools and (2) you are expected to remit one thousand dollars ($1,000) by cashier's check or money order to me at my address, in partial compensation for wasting my time and for assuming that your feeble excuse for skip tracing somehow equates to actual identification. I am not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV, and it's been almost a month since the last time I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express, but I believe this is every bit as enforceable as the crap they put out over the phone. Permalink to this item (posted at 6:27 AM)
17 August 2007
Mugabe likes his job
And he's taking steps to keep it, too:
[Robert Mugabe's Zanu-PF party] is deliberately launching yet another political party against which it will have to fight in the elections.
To be strictly accurate, this is a resurrection rather than a birth. The Zimbabwe People's Party (ZPP) was initially formed in 2000, but has been lying dormant since then. Now it has money coming directly from the Central Intelligence Organisation (CIO). And now, with former CIO heavyweight Justin Chiota at its head, it is campaigning vigorously for members, and ultimately for votes. Which would theoretically make it harder for Zanu-PF to win seats in Parliament, except for this minor detail:
The aim of the ZPP is to confuse the voter, to split the vote, to complicate the ballot papers, to diffuse the inevitably strong opposition to the Mugabe regime.
Come election time, voters will choose ZPP as a protest vote against Zanu-PF, little realising this means the main opposition parties will lose votes. If by chance a ZPP candidate wins, he will sit solidly alongside Zanu-PF in parliament. So the ZPP is Aquafina to Robert Mugabe's Pepsi. Downright ingenious, if I say so myself. The only way Mugabe loses this election is if he hires Bob Shrum. Permalink to this item (posted at 5:54 PM)
18 August 2007
Shipping advice
If your package is coming from this firm, you probably should fake an illness and stay home:
Whoever came up with the asinine idea to deliver packages to residential addresses only from Monday to Friday, 8 AM to 5 PM, should be shot with fifty water guns and shipped to Timbuktu in a refrigerated tanker. With no extra change of dry pants.
During the period specified, I might be at home for a total of seven minutes, max. Who puts the "cur" in "courier"? She doesn't say, except that it "sounds like an internet speed." Damned hard luck if you don't know your broadband options. Permalink to this item (posted at 10:41 AM)
29 August 2007
Memo to someone who should go away
So you carefully divided your order into two different segments and proffered a different credit card for each, reasoning that you were close to being maxed out, but you could still slide this in under the wire. What are you going to do now that both your cards were declined? (This isn't exactly the most unheard-of thing I ever heard of, but people who pull stunts like this should be sent to Gitmo and stuffed under the sofa.) Permalink to this item (posted at 4:37 PM)
31 August 2007
Doofus alert
Actually, if he'd been more alert, he'd have been less of a doofus. Grrl Genius Cathryn Michon explains:
There's been a man going around L.A., telling people he's my boyfriend, but he’s not. He's not funny or charming or sweet. He isn't a brilliantly talented writer, in fact, he can't even spell.
Can't be me. I'm not going around L.A. these days, and I can spell. Who is this knucklehead?
He's a guy who reached into the mailbox of our apartment building, stole a piece of mail with a check in it, printed up some checks, copied Bruce's signature and took every last dime out of the bank account, despite misspelling the name of Bruce's company.
But that's not what makes him a maroon. This is:
He's an idiot, this guy, because he showed I.D. with his actual name and his actual address on it and so the police dropped by a few days ago and arrested him.
Sheesh. Remember when criminals used to have standards? Permalink to this item (posted at 10:45 AM)
10 September 2007
Hey, you with the garbage
You know what would be really cool? If you actually closed the top of that goddamn truck so cardboard boxes and such wouldn't come spinning out of it every time you changed lanes. But then, you'd be deprived of the joy of watching someone catching the edge of one of them and then schlepping it six miles down the highway, so I suppose that's not part of your plan. Permalink to this item (posted at 1:17 PM)
30 October 2007
The right to rob the cradle
Doesn't exist, not even in the European Union:
[A]ging German playboy Rolf Eden seems to have developed a somewhat warped view of what age discrimination actually is. According to Bild Zeitung on Thursday, the 77-year-old Eden has filed suit against a 19-year-old Berlin woman for the following reason: Despite a night on the town with Eden, which ended back at his place, she refused to have sex with him, saying [that] he was too old for her.
"That was shattering. No woman has ever said that to me before," Eden told the tabloid. "I was crushed." He has filed charges with the prosecutors' office, he said. "After all, there are laws against discrimination." No woman? Ever? Hugh Hefner was not available for comment: I suspect he was at the Grotto with a couple of blondes. (Via Kathy Shaidle.) Permalink to this item (posted at 1:26 PM)
16 November 2007
Note to certain cretinous goons
It's not so much that I object to fixing the problems you caused that is, after all, part of the job description but it's galling in the extreme to know that you won't suffer any consequences for having caused them. Yeah, I know. Life isn't fair. Never has been, never will be. But if there's anything to this karma business, somewhere down the line you're going to be spending all your waking hours searching for Purina Weasel Chow. Permalink to this item (posted at 11:45 AM)
19 November 2007
26 November 2007
A dab of Armor All behind the mirrors
This guy shouldn't be allowed in a parking lot:
Wong was observed checking out three BMW vehicles on display at the BMW display at the Home and Garden Show on March 22. Then, he was seen sitting on the roof of a 2007 BMW 328i sedan, valued at $50,000.
Shortly after that, Wong had dropped his sweat pants to his ankles and was spotted masturbating while sitting with his legs dangling over the driver's door window. Security eventually detained Wong until police showed up and a clean-up crew had to wash down the BMW. Apparently it's not just Bimmers, either:
[A psychiatrist] said Wong reported he also gets aroused by certain cars, including a 1967 Camaro and a 1955 Chevy Bel Air, and blames the owners for buying the cars because it tempts him to "pleasure" himself.
Court heard Wong was also arrested May 24 for jumping on a 2005 Mini Cooper outside the downtown Boston Pizza, dropping his pants and proceeding to "tuck, rub and bounce his naked genitalia" on the hood of the car. He also admitted climbing onto the roof of a 1991 Buick Century parked at the rear of a south-side home, taking off his clothes and masturbating on June 12. A '91 Buick? This guy is hard-core and then some. They're going to have to chain him to an AMC Gremlin, drive him halfway up the Dempster Highway, and leave him there. (Via The Poor Farm.) Permalink to this item (posted at 7:00 AM)
23 December 2007
Stuck on stupid
Yeah, this ought to work just fine:
Before making his ruling Tuesday, [US Magistrate Judge James] Marschewski granted requests by all three defendants to dismiss their attorneys and to allow them to represent themselves. The three attorneys had filed requests to withdraw because either their clients did not want representation or because they would not cooperate in the preparation of their defense.
Note to defendants: when your own counsel wants out, you're in deep kimchi. And it gets deeper:
[Timothy Shawn] Donavan, representing himself, told Marschewski that he and the U. S. government were an artificial entity and that the magistrate had no authority over Donavan because he was not an artificial entity.
"You have no power over me," Donavan told Marschewski. "I am a living, breathing, free man of the Earth." "Go away before someone drops a house on you!"
[Sharon Jeannette] Henningsen told Marschewski on Tuesday that he and the government owed the three defendants $5 billion for defaulting on a promissory note they signed last month and which they claimed satisfied their bail bond and the criminal case against them. "The law recognizes promissory notes and greenbacks as legal tender," she said.
The note, included in a batch of papers filed with Marschewski, said the government had three days from receipt of the note to drop the case against them or be liable for the value of the note. I am not a lawyer, but I believe this to be the procedural equivalent of "A sphincter says what?" And it just keeps on getting better:
Another document, entitled "Schedule D: Default confessions, stipulations and admissions," said the United States was a corporate body politic without geographic borders.
That paper also said the defendants were foreign to the United States and that any legal action against them by the government was the equivalent of enslaving them. Which suggests a solution: how about parachuting the three of them into the middle of the Gaza Strip? If finances are tight, they could skip the parachutes. Rita says this proves her rule:
Reading a lawbook does not qualify one to be a lawyer any more than reading the Bible qualifies one to be the Pope.
Someone want to tell this guy? Permalink to this item (posted at 6:52 PM)
26 December 2007
Splogs illustrated
In recent weeks, as much as half of the linkage accorded to me on Technorati has come from scraper sites, a subset of spam blogs ("splogs") which are explained thusly:
The purpose of a splog can be to increase the PageRank or backlink portfolio of affiliate websites, to artificially inflate paid ad impressions from visitors, and/or use the blog as a link outlet to get new sites indexed. Spam blogs are usually a type of scraper site, where content is often either Inauthentic Text or merely stolen (see blog scraping) from other websites. These blogs usually contain a high number of links to sites associated with the splog creator which are often disreputable or otherwise useless websites.
One which perplexed me greatly was Treadmill Reviews and Information, a subdomain under, of all things, a John from Cincinnati message board. The operator basically scrapes everything that mentions the word "treadmill" including this recent post of mine, which uses the usual "42nd and Treadmill" shorthand to describe my workplace. Obviously it has nothing whatever to do with treadmills, but the splog is just jam-packed with the Google AdSense links you might expect. Of course, I'm putting this up to see if it gets scraped which is why I put all the derogatory definitional stuff in the first couple of paragraphs. Permalink to this item (posted at 10:25 AM)
29 December 2007
Repelling the Ronulan Empire
It looks like they'll be busy in Azeroth for a while:
Republican presidential candidate Pon Farr's [not his real name] internet regiment has come to World of Warcraft a group of his supporters are planning to form a guild on Whisperwind and do a march from IF to Stormwind ... on New Year's Day at 8:30pm EST.
To E. M. Zanotti, this explains much:
World of Warcraft, if we aren’t mistaken, is centered around a lot of killing, and this is an ample opportunity to take out certain feelings of frustration with Paultards [her word, not mine] through wholly legal mutilation.
And there's this possible vulnerability:
Also, we can rest easy knowing that a key requirement to be a Pon Farr [still not his real name] supporter is not having a girlfriend, which explains why they have so much time to spam stuff and so much apparently disposable income.
I should point out that this doesn't work in reverse: there's no evidence to support "unlucky in love, lucky in delegate selection," which is just as well, because if there were I'd have done at least one keynote speech at a convention by now. Permalink to this item (posted at 6:09 PM)
31 December 2007
A multiple-choice question
EXTRA CREDIT (10 points): You discover that you know absolutely nothing about multivitamins. Commendably, you seek to remedy this situation. Which of the following scenarios presents you with the best opportunity to do so?
Caution: This may or may not be a trick question. Permalink to this item (posted at 5:50 PM)
4 February 2008
Climb every mountain
General Motors knew exactly what they were doing when they began producing the Hummer: they were creating a niche vehicle, instantly recognizable something you can't say of too many of the General's generics with off-road and rock-hopping capabilities as good as any you could get anywhere. So I have no trouble defending the Hummer. Some of its owners, maybe not so much:
So I'm in the parking lot at Lowes and nitwit in the hummer is taking up far too much road space. Along comes little car with family inside, taking up the appropriate space in the road and refusing to budge. Nitwit in hummer was forced to hop the curb and of course shouted a few explicits out of the window. I followed, plenty of room since I was too driving a normal sized car.
If he'd left it at that but no:
"Did you see that, did you see that, I had to go up on the curb to avoid that idiot, did you see where he parked?"
I quickly looked around, hoping beyond all hope nitwit wasn't addressing me, I only wanted to run in and get some molding. No such luck.
"Some people, I'm going to have to take my car to the garage tomorrow, the wheels are probably all out of alignment."
I snorted, I couldn't stop myself, it was an involuntary sound it just came out. It's the kind of snort one makes when they’re trying desperately not to laugh at the pure lunacy of nitwit. "Excuse me?" said nitwit indignantly I was forced to respond. "Look", says me "that is not a car, you're driving a hummer. It was built to crush small villages in war-torn areas. Haven't you seen the commercials, apparently it can scale a 65% incline. I seriously doubt you knocked your wheels out of alignment and if you did, ask for a refund. If you're not aware of your vehicle's capabilities perhaps you should consider a small car and do us all a favor by allowing us to drive around parking lots without fear of you infringing on our side of the road have a nice day." And for the coup de grâce:
And as I turned to leave "You probably swerve around tiny little pot holes as well don't you?"
The curtain of charity descends. Permalink to this item (posted at 2:06 PM)
19 February 2008
Standards aren't what they used to be
"I am a professional proofreader," she insisted. There are twenty digits associated with a credit card: sixteen in the number (unless it's American Express), four in the expiration date. Of these twenty, she managed to screw up nine. And of course she claimed it was our fault because, after all, she is a professional proofreader. A pox on her. Not a big pox: small will do nicely. Permalink to this item (posted at 10:31 AM)
21 February 2008
Duel on the Broadway Extension
The attitude of some people is "As a matter of fact, I do own this damn road." Brad Neese has an unfortunate encounter with one of them:
She sped up, caught up to me and started riding my rear bumper, at times less than half a car length behind me and at 60mph, that's pretty darn close. She was flashing her lights at me, gesturing wildly through her front windshield (which included many fervent displays of her middle digit) and weaving wildly behind me. As we started approaching slowing traffic, I made my second mistake: I tapped my brakes, hoping she would clue in to the fact that she needed to back off or we would be involved in a fender bender before we knew it. That sent her over the edge.
As we hit the congestion and were then moving at less than half of our original speed and still slowing down, she moved over to the lane to the right of me and slowly passed me. Her gesturing became more crazed and emphatic (which I didn't think could possibly be more demonstrative than her earlier antics but was). She didn’t speed on, which she could have since she was in such a damn hurry. No, instead, she wanted me to know how wrong I was and how pissed she was. She did her best to match my speed, but was driving just ahead of me so that her rear bumper was about even with my front bumper. Realizing that she was going to try to cut in front of me to slam on her brakes, I kept a very close distance between me and the vehicle in front of me. She kept weaving across the center line between the lanes like she was going to either hit me or force her way in so that I would slam into her when she hit her brakes. He got a picture of one of her gestures: the classic digitus impudicus. It's a shame he couldn't have snapped the tag on her Civic, so we'd have some way to identify the miserable trollop and steer clear of her until such time as either (1) she learns how to drive or (2) she's compressed into an oblate spheroid as she slams into a Jersey barrier during one of her hissy fits. Permalink to this item (posted at 8:01 AM)
11 March 2008
Cap busted
Really, hasn't everyone in retail or services, at one time or another, wanted to shoot a customer in the backside? Permalink to this item (posted at 11:20 AM)
19 April 2008
Fiendishly clever yet not so bright
For your daily dose of cognitive dissonance, a wrong turn at Albuquerque, cut and pasted without corrections:
The woman accused of bliking her ex-husband out of thousands of dollars in child support for a toddler who didn't exist was back in court Friday.
Viola Trevino is accused of creating an elaborate plot including face DNA tests and a rented child to convince a judge that she deserved the payments. Now prosecutors want her to strand trail for the fraud, but her attorney claims she's not mentally capable because of a low IQ, brain damage and a delusional state of mind. Which might also describe the person who wrote up this story for Channel 7: there are at least four places where I'd be tempted to insert "[sic]" without even seeing the original outline. If I'd written something like that in junior high school, Mrs Muckenfuss would have had me stranded on a trail somewhere. Still, I feel for Ms Trevino. She's got a wonderfully complex and devious mind, capable of executing the most elaborate plots; simultaneously, she's dismissed as dumb as a post. Now I know how George W. Bush feels after reading editorials. Permalink to this item (posted at 11:03 AM)
7 May 2008
Robinator invoked
Australian writer Bob Ellis, apparently wounded by a Tim Blair taunt, actually comes back with this:
I was made Columnist of the Year in 2003 for regular pieces I wrote on subjects of morality. Does he have a similar award? Can he show it to me?
I have 18 other major awards for television drama, theatre and feature film writing, including three Premier's Awards. What prizes does Tim have in these areas? Regular readers of these pages will recognize this particular gambit as Playing the Rob Schneider Card. Background, early 2005:
Which would have been the end of that, except that six months later, Roger Ebert stepped into the fray:
Schneider is correct, and Patrick Goldstein has not yet won a Pulitzer Prize. As chance would have it, I have won the Pulitzer Prize, and so I am qualified. Speaking in my official capacity as a Pulitzer Prize winner, Mr. Schneider, your movie sucks.
Were I Bob Ellis, I'd be listening carefully for another shoe to drop. Just in case. Permalink to this item (posted at 7:52 PM)
8 May 2008
Fit to be towed
With gas pushing four bucks a gallon and maintenance prices out of sight, you, too, may have to abandon your motor vehicle, as did the owner of an early-Nineties Buick at 42nd and Treadmill Tuesday night. If this should happen to you, the following advice may be helpful:
The preceding has been brought to you as a public service. Permalink to this item (posted at 7:52 PM)
|
These archives begin 6 September 2006. For items beginning in August 2002, click here and select the desired category.
Click the Permalink on an individual entry to read comments and TrackBacks if any. |