Archive for Ease and Disease

Something less than perfect

Finding something wrong with the American health-care system, if “system” it be, is about as difficult as finding weeds in your next-door neighbor’s yard, especially since those weeds will eventually be in your yard. “Why can’t we do it like the Canadians do?” ask some people. Well, we could do worse, and pretty much any tweaking we do to our “system” will insure that we will do worse. Still, parking several billion dollars’ worth of bureaucrats throughout the chain will have similar results no matter whose flag they fly:

I’m curious: what must have happened to provoke the powers that be to make the health care system so inanely bureaucratic that wait times for life-saving surgeries are dramatically increased because of all the referrals for referrals required? Who could it possibly benefit?

I’ve written before about the system. After seeing an oncologist, to get a second visit to arrange to get a referral to a surgeon requires another referral to the oncologist from a family doctor. The same is true of many specialists.

We don’t necessarily do any better down here, and we have the additional complication of checking to see if anyone in the chain is Out Of Network, which will cost us a surcharge of somewhere between 20 percent and infinity.

Imagine the savings to the health care costs if, on the first visit to the oncologist, you were given your options WITH the names and numbers of various doctors to see depending on the decision you make, and then you were allowed to actually call them all by yourself! So once you decide to go with the hysterectomy before the mastectomy, then you DIRECTLY call the gynecologist!! That would be amazing!! But instead, it’s a bizarre, circuitous route from the family doctor to the oncologist to the family doctor to the oncologist (who says this should have been done months ago) and finally to whatever surgeon you need to save your own life.

Rules, rules, rules. And every bureaucracy worthy of the name has someone whose sole interest in life is insuring that all Ts are crossed, all Is are dotted, and no sentence ends with a period followed by two spaces. This is useful for a secondary-school English teacher; it’s not so useful for anyone in the health biz.

Comments (1)




But we want it now

Californians will not be getting single-payer health care this year. Some of them are quite upset about that.

Comments (2)




Stuck for less

The proper response to the upjacking of the price of the EpiPen, courtesy of the FDA:

US regulators have approved new competition for EpiPen, the emergency allergy medicine that made Mylan a poster child for pharmaceutical company greed.

The Food and Drug Administration on Thursday approved Adamis Pharmaceuticals Corp.’s product, which should go on sale later this year.

Symjepi is a syringe prefilled with the hormone epinephrine, which helps stop life-threatening allergic reactions from insect stings and bites, foods such as nuts and eggs, or certain medications.

San Diego-based Adamis says its product is easier to use than Mylan’s EpiPen, a spring-loaded syringe filled with a set dose that comes with a training device.

Symjepi also is smaller than EpiPen, so it’s easier to fit in a pocket or purse.

Yes, but is it kinder to your wallet?

Adamis said it is still lining up a distributor so it hasn’t set the exact price for its product, which will be sold in pairs like EpiPen.

Adamis spokesman Mark Flather said Symjepi is intended to be a “low-cost alternative” to EpiPen and similar products, and the company is aiming to sell it for less than generic EpiPens.

We’ll have to keep an eye out for it.

(Via Fark.)

Comments (1)




Doing that VSG thing

VSG = vertical sleeve gastrectomy, the latest new wrinkle in bariatric (stomach-stapling) surgery. (I learn something every day.)

The “babies” cited will enter first grade and kindergarten this fall, so they’re not exactly infants. (Oh, the things you can be excited for. Me, I was excited by the sight of that Chick-Fil-A van.)

Comments (2)




It’s broccoli, dear

It’s just a little bitty tablet:

A chemical called sulforaphane, found in broccoli sprouts, has previously demonstrated an ability to reduce glucose levels in diabetic rats. Anders Rosengren of the University of Gothenburg in Sweden, and his colleagues wondered whether the same might be true for humans. To test the theory, his team gave 97 people with type 2 diabetes a concentrated dose of sulforaphane every day for three months, or a placebo. All but three people in the trial continued taking metformin. Those who didn’t take metformin were able to control their condition relatively well without it.

The concentration of sulforaphane given was around 100 times that found naturally in broccoli. “It was the same as eating around five kilograms of broccoli daily,” says Rosengren.

On average, those who received the broccoli extract saw their blood glucose reduce by 10 per cent more than those on the placebo. The extract was most effective in obese participants with “dysregulated” diabetes, whose baseline glucose levels were higher to start with.

“We’re very excited about the effects we’ve seen and are eager to bring the extract to patients,” says Rosengren. “We saw a reduction of glucose of about 10 per cent, which is sufficient to reduce complications in the eyes, kidneys and blood,” he says.

Besides, if you tried to eat 5 kg of broccoli, your intestines would be playing the opening to Also sprach Zarathustra.

Journal reference, should you need it: Science Translational Medicine, DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aah4477.

(Via Fark.)

Comments (6)




We didn’t mean to give a fence

In this brief clip, a young moose is freed from a stockade, kinda sorta:

Unharmed and happy. (Mynd you, møøse bites Kan be pretty nasti…)

Comments (4)




How do I look?

Not everyone I’m likely to meet, I’ve discovered, is prepared to deal with someone who walks only with a bunch of equipment.

Comments (5)




Gone far too soon

An email sent to contributors to her medical-treatment fund, which raised somewhere on the far side of $60,000:

We regret to inform you about this sad tragedy.

On Friday January 7, 2013 at 1:30 PM our loved daughter Kiki took her last breath as her heart stopped. She experienced no pain.

It was unexpected and I don’t really know what went wrong. We had hopes that she will recover since progress was made. A few days prior to her leaving us she had issue with “out of range Potassium and sodium levels”. We tried to balance it with proper drugs which also increased her heart rate and lower her blood pressure. The medical team here at CHOC Hospital in Orange County has tried to increase her blood pressure rate with different medication but without success. Around 11:00 Am on Friday we experienced a drastic drop in her heart rate which basically symbolized the end for the medical staff.

I was standing next to her talking, massaging, kissing and hopping that the heart rate will climb back up. I called my friend Tara Strong and together we have tried to encourage Kiki to keep on going. When the heart rate kept on dropping we realized that this is the end. I asked Tara to sing for Kiki the “My Little Mermaid” song since Kiki loved Tara and this song. It was a magical moment; a few of the nurses in the room whispery joined and sang with Tara as Kiki has taken her last breath. Thank you Tara Strong for everything you have done for Kiki.

We have lost the war but not without a fight. There was NO MEDICAL TREATMENT for the type of cancer Kiki had, especially because of the late diagnostic by the hospital in Los Angeles and the Misdiagnosis of the tumor type by the same medical professionals. Without a doubt I feel that Chemo would have been fatal (32 month ago the doctors told us that Chemo may buy us 1-3 month may be a month or two longer if we are lucky). As parents we cannot deny medical treatment to a child if doctors feel it will be effective. Science and the medical industry went a long way but at this point of the game there is no cure for many illnesses including cancer. As parents we must try anything because a cure can come from any one.

And now, the fight goes on:

This fundraiser is to support legal justice for the wrongful death of our daughter Kiki Havivy.

On January 4, 2011, at the age of 5 years old, Kiki Havivy had surgery at Kaiser Permanente in Los Angeles and was diagnosed with a tumor type called PNET. On January 13, 2011, 9 days after her surgery Kaiser doctor Jerry Cheng informed the parents that Kiki had a Highly Malignant cancer called Glioblastoma stage IV. Dr. Cheng gave Kiki up to 6 months to live with a (0) zero chance of survival. While later it was discovered that Kiki’s tumor was misdiagnosed by Kaiser and yet, no one at Kaiser ever questioned the discrepancy in her diagnosis nor did anyone ever do a third opinion as to what the correct diagnosis should have been.

Most of that original $60k came from the brony community; I am somewhat surprised that they haven’t rushed in for this new endeavor. Tara Strong, voice of Twilight Sparkle, duly reported the story to Twitter, and I thank her for that. Maybe I can awaken a few memories in the ponyverse.

Comments (1)




Frozen in position

What do you do when you’re approaching a busy intersection and suddenly the lower half of your body seems to be disconnected from the upper?

This is not a question I’d been spending much time on, until suddenly I had to.

Comments (2)




Keepers of the sacred tablets

Welcome to Rare Disease Month. (Actually, I think that was February, but no matter.) This should make the producers of the few remaining soap operas very, very happy. Look what it did for ABC’s General Hospital:

A recent plot twist … had one character not just getting any cancer, but polycythemia vera (PV), a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). In other words, a rare form of blood cancer for which the standard treatment is blood-letting and anticoagulants.

The TV patient, not satisfied with this prognosis, demands of the doctor, “This protocol sounds like you are treating the symptoms of this cancer; how do we beat it?” “I have to keep going to bloodlettings for the rest of my life?”

Now that’s the beginning of a story arc for the ages. And there’s technical assistance to be had:

Why is GH highlighting this incredibly specific cancer? It’s ostensibly the culmination of a partnership between a company called the Incyte Corporation and the producers of the show to raise awareness for MPNs as part of rare disease month.

Or, you know, not:

But in an opinion piece published this week in medical journal JAMA, Dr. Sham Mailankody of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Dr. Vinay Prasad of Oregon Health & Science University argue that this is really just stealth advertising for Incyte, which just so happens to make only one FDA-approved product, ruxolitinib, which (you can probably see where this is going) is used to treat MPNs, including PV.

Doesn’t sound like an off-label usage. What’s the problem?

But the fictional circumstances could make it seem like ruxolitinib is a first-line therapy for PV, which it is not, the doctors note.

“Instead it has a precise and narrow indication,” they write, explaining that the drug is approved only for patients with an inadequate response or intolerance to chemotherapy, who are dependent on blood-letting, and who have an enlarged spleen.

“Thus, if PV is rare, appropriate use of ruxolitinib in PV should be rarer still,” the doctors say.

On the other hand, you’re not going to see routine stuff like mere strep on General Hospital, fercrissake. And you don’t want to know how much Jakafi (the brand name under which ruxolitinib is sold) is going to cost.

Oh, you do? I checked prices in my neighborhood, and we’re talking $2,800.

For fourteen tablets.

Two hundred bucks, give or take a dollar or three, per tab. If you’re going to be able to afford that, it probably helps to have a steady gig on an ABC soap.

Comments




Let ’em die

“First, do no harm.” This is not technically part of the Hippocratic Oath, but it’s consistent with its values. So naturally, it’s got to go:

Remember that once you change the idea that docs never kill to the idea that killing is mandatory if “asked,” then you get docs (and nurses) who decide to be god and doing the killing spontaneously, or causing a person to die indirectly, not because the treatment won’t really help the patient, but merely because the patient is looked down on as useless, so why not?

An unfortunate incident to illustrate:

Once I worked a few weeks filling in at the ER at one of the IHS hospitals in the Sioux area. While I was giving report to my replacement, a moonlighting resident who worked in Baltimore but flew in to help on the weekend, one of the staff members came in to ask if we would check an x ray that the feeding tube was placed correctly so they could tube feed a lady with a recent stroke until her swallowing ability improved.

The resident, however, said: “Why don’t you just give her morphine, haha”… (implying we shouldn’t feed her but just sedate her into a coma and let her die of dehydration etc). The staff doctor said “WHAT?” and the resident repeated the same thing.

The staff doctor said quietly: “well, we don’t do things that way here,” and left, telling the nurse he would be back later in the evening to check the x ray.

I kept silent, since I had no authority here but knew my next door neighbor was a member of the American Indian movement and would have her group intervene if this was done.

But you know, I wonder how many poor black patients he cared for in Baltimore also got “morphine, haha.”

The black community already distrusts the medical community but since elder suicide is seen as a problem for rich white people, they aren’t worried about this. Yet.

“First, do nothing”?

Comments (2)




Twenty-eight left

A couple of years ago, the Family Physician set me up with a 30-day trial ($10 out of pocket) of something called Invokana (canagliflozin). After a couple of doses, I felt terribly queasy, and abandoned the drug; after 15 years or so, the doctor knows when I’m giving up on something, and that was the end of that.

It theoretically could have been much, much worse:

People with diabetes are already at risk of having lower limbs amputated because of circulatory and nerve damage that the disease does over time. However, in two clinical trials of the drug canagliflozin, marketed as Invokana, Invokamet, and Invokamet XR, patients taking the drug were twice as likely to need amputations.

Most of the amputations were of toes or the middle of the foot, but some patients needed their entire foot or leg removed, sometimes even above the knee.

The FDA is now calling for the dreaded Black Box Warning.

I know only one other person who takes this stuff; I’m debating whether I should shove this link under his nose, or wait for the Black Box Warning to show up on the next package.

Addendum: I told him directly.

Comments (5)




Without costing zillions

I wonder if I might someday get a chance to try this out:

A new cartilage-like hydrogel material could make the job of repairing knees much easier, say scientists, as it’s 3D printable and can be made as an exact fit for each individual knee.

The new research focuses on the two crucial shock absorbers inside the knee, known as the menisci, and replacing these parts of our bodies needs both the right material properties and the right shape.

That’s a challenge the scientists from Duke University have taken up, showing that a suitable hydrogel meniscus can be produced by a 3D printer costing US$300 in just a day.

If that feat can be replicated on a larger scale, we’re looking at simple and inexpensive knee repairs for what are usually complex and problematic injuries.

I wish. For the curious:

The research has been printed in ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering.

DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00094

Comments (4)




A disappointment I had expected

Still, it flattened me more than I thought it would: today was the annual Architecture Tour, and it was the first one I’ve missed since 2006. It wasn’t that the price had gone up or anything; it’s just that I can’t manage more than about a dozen steps before going woozy, and besides that, getting in and out of the car seven times is a horror in its own right.

I suspect that I’m also going to have to shelve any lingering ideas I might have had for World Tour ’17, presumably some time in the fall when I would have earned some vacation time, having burned up all my 2017 summer days last summer in so-called Recovery Mode. As slowly as this recovery is going, I may never leave town again.

Comments




Beyond mere spam

I think this would bother me:

It’s not like the manufacturer is going broke, apparently:

Like all of the TNF inhibitors, infliximab is an expensive medication, costing about US$900 for a 100 mg dose, and within the United States is covered by almost every medical insurance plan (though caps on many plans make it possible to be covered for only a subset of treatments in the course of a year). Infliximab is supplied as a sterile, white, lyophilized (freeze-dried) powder, so must be reconstituted and administered by a health care professional, usually in a hospital or office setting. For this reason, it is usually covered under major medical insurance rather than prescription drug coverage. The loading regimen for all approved indications occurs at weeks 0, 2, and 6 at the above dosages.

A check of the formulary at CFI Care (not its real initials) got the Nelson Muntz treatment.

Respondents to the original thread estimate the price of this mailer as $25-55 per unit, which I presume you can afford to spend if you’re getting $900 per dose.

(Via SwiftOnSecurity.)

Comments (4)




Save the chocolate for later

You need the vanilla for more important purposes:

Keep a sealed bottle of real vanilla in your first aid kit as a dental pain reliever. If not sealed it will evaporate over time and if you have ever had tooth pain you’ll appreciate the suggestion. Uncap the bottle, remove the seal, hold a tightly wadded paper towel over the opening and turn it upside down for a moment saturating it. Then quickly hold that wad tight against the painful tooth for a full minute. Within 10 seconds the pain will completely disappear.

The real stuff these days costs as much as a trip to the dentist, but the dentist is open maybe 30 hours a week, and maybe she can see you two weeks from now.

(As seen in The Foxfire Book.)

Comments (2)




A miserable spring

And a mostly horizontal one, at that.

So when’s dry season?

Comments (7)




Painless, my eye

Okay, not my eye, exactly:

I suppose everyone’s forgotten Edward Scissorhands by now.

Comments (4)




No matter whose name is on it

“Reforming health care has become an impossibility,” says the Z Man:

As soon as anyone makes any noises about fixing the system, the army of lobbyists, hired by every vested interest, shows up to bury the reformers. If they are not able to kill the idea of reform entirely, they set about corrupting it into another grift that their clients can use to get a free shot at your wallet. The only people not represented in these efforts are the voters. They get no say.

This is the main reason Trump’s efforts to address the problems of ObamaCare failed last week. What Ryan and the other crooks in the GOP were hoping to do is pass a bill that made it easier for their paymasters to skim money from the rate payers, while providing fewer services. Ryan’s bill was just an attempt to help the people feeding at the trough get a little fatter off the middle-class. Its failure suggests we have reached the end phase.

Talk to anyone responsible for paying health insurance premiums and they will tell you that the rates are reaching the point where they cannot be paid. When premiums are going up by multiples of inflation, there can be only one result. Once rates pass a certain level, people stop paying those premiums. You get black markets, non-compliance and a system that can only persist through brute coercion. Soon after you get collapse.

Even Bernie Sanders has figured this out. You’d think someone in the Republican ranks would have caught on by now.

Comments (2)




Permanent adaptation

Despite my ongoing despair, it may be that at some level, I have actually refused to accept the possibility that I will never walk again unassisted. How do I know this? It came to me in a dream.

Comments (2)




Hum a tune, save a life

It’s the way CPR works:

Music can be a lifesaver — literally.

When first responders are being taught to perform hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation, known as CPR, on an adult whose heart has stopped beating, they’re told to administer 2-inch sternum compressions (between the nipples) at a rate of around 100 beats per minute (bpm). That’s a little less than twice a second, and can be hard to approximate. So thank goodness for pop music.

“Staying Alive” by the Bee Gees is a classic example of a song that hits that 100 bpm benchmark (and has obvious connotations to the task at hand). Ditto Gloria Gaynor’s breakup anthem, “I Will Survive.” Looking for something a little less on the nose? Try Hanson’s mega-hit “MMMBop.” All of those tracks appear on a 100-bpm playlist released this week by New York Presbyterian Hospital.

And if you dig reverse psychology, there’s Norman Greenbaum’s evergreen “Spirit in the Sky” — and Queen’s “Another One Bites the Dust.”

(Via Fark.)

Comments (6)




Tore him a new one

Either that, or greatly expanded the old one. Nevertheless, it had to hurt like hell.

Moral: Never, ever tell a ton and a half of angry hamburger to stick it.

Comments (4)




No matter how many payers

By now no one should be surprised by this:

[A]ll systems of paying for and providing healthcare suck; all of them suck worse if you’re poor and none of them are especially bad if you’re rich. There is no happy, Disney-movie solution and on many levels, the more lawmakers mess with it, the worse it gets.

Before all this started, if you were poor and didn’t have insurance, you were perfectly free to die in a ditch; if you chose not to, showing up at a hospital emergency room would get you treatment (hospitals are generally not allowed to turn away anyone who is genuinely ill or injured) and a whopping huge bill. Under ACA, you could also die in a ditch or walk into a hospital uninsured, but you were going to be fined in addition to the big bill*; under ACHA, the uninsured get the same two choices and skip the fine, but if they choose the hospital and survive to buy insurance they will pay a 30% surcharge on their premiums — and so will you, if you go more than two months without insurance. This is all very interesting, but if the initial aim was to reduce the number of uninsured citizens who die in ditches, exactly how does either plan accomplish that goal? They don’t, no more than a low-flow showerhead in Seattle or Indianapolis helps droughts in California or a shrinking fossil aquifer in Arizona.

The line I keep hearing is that “everyone has to be insured so the risk pool is large enough,” which will come as a surprise to the statisticians and actuaries who work for insurance companies. It does not take a huge pool to make the risk usefully predictable and there’s a lower limit to the rule that adding more people makes the risk more predictable and therefore allows reducing the amount of “just in case” money the insurer needs to keep for off-the-prediction surprises: you do have to pay all those mathematicians, adjusters, attorneys, salesmen, managers, top brass and support staff — and the investors are hoping for a little profit on the money they have put up to get the whole thing rolling, too. The thing people seem to think they are saying boils down to “if everyone pitched in a dollar, we’d all be able to afford healthcare when we needed it,” a charming sentiment that skips blissfully over what right the rest of us have to demand a dollar from every random stranger.

As always, there’s a footnote:

* The fine is (if I remember correctly) under $2500, which is just about big enough to be insulting and for the the person without two dimes to rub together, might as well be $25,000 or $250,000.

I’m awaiting the first proposal that calls for filling in all the ditches, so no one can die therein.

Comments (6)




Shrinkage may occur

If you’ve been thinking that what I need more than anything is to see a psychiatrist, well, you got your wish.

And during that first visit, she decided that I probably ought to be taking twice as much antidepressant, and wrote me the appropriate script. Anything else I might conclude is almost surely premature.

Comments (3)




Down to get the friction on, or off

One thing about those handy little skis for the back of one’s walker: they don’t last all that long. Of course, six months ago I would never have believed that I’d still have to use this cursed thing half a year later.

Anyway, after going through half a dozen of them, I switched brands. The newer ones come from Yunga Tart, and I’ve only worn through one pair in two months. The bag says they’re “Super glidey,” and I don’t know about that, but putting on the spares last night made the hated device several percentage points easier to push.

These attach differently from all the others: instead of friction-fit around the base of the walker leg, it has an expandable (so it fits sizes other than 1″) center section, placed with a setscrew.

According to the bag, the bag is made in China, and printed there, but the actual equipment is made in the USA.

Comments (3)




Sugar in the morning, sugar in the evening

But God forbid you have sugar at suppertime:

I know I need to be less credulous about such things but the “prediabetes” PSAs get under my skin because they seem to imply EVERYONE is (apparently 1/3 of people over 18 qualify by the standards, and half over 65). BUT: I have read a couple of articles recently that are by doctors/endocrinologists who are skeptical of the designation and who argue it’s not that helpful, and just leads to worry for some people (like me), other people who might actually benefit from lifestyle changes ignoring medical advice, and perhaps leads to unneeded interventions with medication. (And also, there is a strong streak in the US of “you brought this on yourself” — and if I turn up prediabetic or diabetic I will be FURIOUS because then why am I doing 150+ minutes of exercise a week, and trying to avoid added sugars, and not eating potatoes, and limiting how much bread I eat, and I gave up orange juice and sodas a long time ago … but of course, if you have that unlucky genetics, there you are.) I have enough of a perfectionist streak in me to make me miserable and ascetic about things, and I could see how hearing “your blood sugar is a little high” leading me to do something like give up ALL carbohydrates and try to exist on eggs, meat, and vegetables.

I am neither a doctor nor an endocrinologist, and it’s been a few years since I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express, but I am becoming persuaded that this “prediabetes” business is a chimera. In the diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes, symptoms are largely irrelevant. What matters are the numbers: score badly enough, and down comes the giant foot to crush you into submission. And those numbers are purely arbitrary: 126 mg/dl (says WHO), A1C 6.5 (American Diabetic Association). What’s more, some medications you might take for other reasons tend to push those numbers up. I’m starting to believe that eventually everyone gets it, if something else doesn’t get them first. My own approach to the disease is simply to keep the numbers low enough to keep the medical profession from complaining loudly.

Comments (2)




Good as dead

I suppose that I’ve already beaten the odds, or at least flattened them a bit:

Vivek Murthy, the surgeon general of the United States, has said many times in recent years that the most prevalent health issue in the country is not cancer or heart disease or obesity. It is isolation.

Do you think maybe we’re sick of other people?

Beginning in the 1980s … study after study started showing that those who were more socially isolated were much more likely to die during a given period than their socially connected neighbors, even after you corrected for age, gender, and lifestyle choices like exercising and eating right. Loneliness has been linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and stroke and the progression of Alzheimer’s. One study found that it can be as much of a long-term risk factor as smoking.

The research doesn’t get any rosier from there. In 2015, a huge study out of Brigham Young University, using data from 3.5 million people collected over 35 years, found that those who fall into the categories of loneliness, isolation, or even simply living on their own see their risk of premature death rise 26 to 32 percent.

Let the record show that “eating right” is something that requires a correction factor.

The studies under discussion deal with the longevity, or lack thereof, of men, which suggests the Real Reason why women live longer: less research.

(Via Jason Kottke, a mere 43 years old.)

Comments (4)




GOPcare

I am having no difficulty curbing my enthusiasm for whatever spaniel’s brunch the Republicans come up with to replace the ACA. Mostly, it seems hurried, as though someone went through an outline, printed up a set of bullet points, and then tried to come up with something for each of them.

That said, Megan McArdle thinks even less of it than I do:

There is no sensible thing that you can do to our health-care system that will not offend huge numbers of voters. Thus we got Obamacare, a program which, to a first approximation, 0 percent of Democratic policy analysts would have put forward if asked to design a rational program to extend coverage and improve health-care delivery. It was a gigantic Rube Goldberg contraption, deliberately complicated and opaque to avoid openly angering any important constituency, and arguably, fatally flawed for that same reason.

Now that Republicans have their turn in the spotlight, they’re resorting to all the same tricks: the secrecy, the opacity, the long implementation delays (the better to get a good score from the Congressional Budget Office, and oh, yes, also, get them past the next election before voters meet their program). The inability of either party to make a principled stand for sensible policy is a problem, a very big one. And Republicans sure haven’t fixed it.

The only people who are going to be happy about this situation, I suspect, are those crying in the wilderness for single-payer — because the worse it gets, the more likely they are to have their dream eventually fulfilled.

Comments (3)




Apple Bloom says get with it

Life is too short to spend wallowing in depression, says a 17-year-old singer/actress:

While we’re at it, let’s get a second opinion:

I suspect The Truth Is Somewhere In Between.

(Slightly salty language in the second video.)

Comments (3)




Going before the voters

California has a ballot initiative for statewide single-payer health care, and in terms of ballot language, it is admirably clear. Senate Bill 562, if you please:

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1. This act shall be known, and may be cited, as the Californians for a Healthy California Act.

SEC. 2. (a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:

    (1) All residents of this state have the right to health care. While the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act brought many improvements in health care and health care coverage, it still leaves many Californians without coverage or with inadequate coverage.

    (2) Californians, as individuals, employers, and taxpayers have experienced a rise in the cost of health care and health care coverage in recent years, including rising premiums, deductibles, and copays, as well as restricted provider networks and high out-of-network charges.

    (3) Businesses have also experienced increases in the costs of health care benefits for their employees, and many employers are shifting a larger share of the cost of coverage to their employees or dropping coverage entirely.

    (4) Individuals often find that they are deprived of affordable care and choice because of decisions by health benefit plans guided by the plan’s economic needs rather than consumers’ health care needs.

    (5) To address the fiscal crisis facing the health care system and the state, and to ensure Californians can exercise their right to health care, comprehensive health care coverage needs to be provided.

(b) It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would establish a comprehensive universal single-payer health care coverage program and a health care cost control system for the benefit of all residents of the state.

Okay, that name is terrible. And “rights,” at least the way I learned about them in school, simply exist; they can’t be created out of whole cloth by mere humans.

Still, the Trump administration’s executive order calling for killing off Obamacare also calls for the Feds to “provide greater flexibility to states and cooperate with them in implementing health care programs,” and I figure that if Californians really, truly want this, whatever it might cost them in the long run, I can’t think of any good reason why they shouldn’t have it.

Comments (2)