Now this is just sad:
On the other hand, I can relate: if I caught my spouse with a squirrel, I’m not sure I wouldn’t get all stabby.
Now this is just sad:
On the other hand, I can relate: if I caught my spouse with a squirrel, I’m not sure I wouldn’t get all stabby.
Something all right, everything tells me that she didn’t think this all the way through:
I don’t want opinions. I want facts, please.
I gave her a by-God fact, you may be sure.
Strange and wonderful things sometimes happen in the Twin Cities. With the Thunder up 113-111 with 2.2 left, Kevin Love, who’d already clocked 30 points, went up for a trey; Kendrick Perkins went up for a block, drew a foul, and Love reported to the foul line for three free throws.
He got nothing.
Seriously. He bricked the first two, attempted a deliberate miss, and didn’t even hit the rim. Possession passed to the Thunder, the Wolves had to foul, and Kevin Durant, exhibiting preternatural calm, knocked down two freebies to close it out, 115-111. Forty-eight of those points came from KD, a season high. But while The Greatest Scorer on Earth, to borrow radio guy Matt Pinto’s phrase, was collecting buckets, the rest of the team was rising well beyond their recent fourth-quarter woes. (Be it noted that Minnesota had a 13-point lead early in the fourth.) Jeremy Lamb got four of his eight rebounds, a career high, in the fourth; Derek Fisher and Reggie Jackson managed to survive with five fouls (and Fisher, in 25 minutes, led the bench with 13); Nick Collison stemmed the tide of points in the paint for the Wolves. You want a Telltale Statistic? You got one: all the OKC reserves, but none of the starters, finished on the plus side of the ledger. (KD, despite his 48 points, turned in a zero.) Then again, all the Minnesota reserves were minus, and none of them even scored except J. J. Barea, who had five.
But the starting Wolves didn’t need that much help from the bench. In fact, all five of them landed in double figures, and Love wasn’t even the high scorer: that would be Nikola Peković, who scored 31 and picked off 11 rebounds, second only to Love, who collected 14. Ricky Rubio had the night’s third double-double, with 13 points and 10 assists. And who knows what Corey Brewer might have done had he not fouled out trying to defend Durant?
It’s warmer in OKC, but not enormously so: in fact, it will be warmer tomorrow in Boston. But the Celtics will be here at the ‘Peake, and one should not be fooled by their 1-6 record over the last seven.
For each of the past six weeks, I have picked up a four-pack of 60-watt incandescent bulbs at the grocery store, which gives me a reserve of 24. (Actually 26, since I had two on hand at the beginning.) As of the first of January, these small and inoffensive creatures have been marked for extinction by the haters in Washington, so I made a point of stopping by the appropriate shelf at the store this afternoon.
The shelf was about four packages short of full, which is about where it always has been, so it’s too early to make any sort of prediction. (Most of them were branded Philips, with a single row of Westinghouse.) If, as has been suggested, the industry Big Boys themselves pushed for the extinction of incandescents, well, they haven’t made a great deal of headway at getting the spendy stuff into this store: there were plenty of off-brand CFLs going for about a third less than the GE-branded twirlers, and LEDs were conspicuous by their absence. Then again, this particular store draws mainly lower-income customers, who are not likely to be looking for ten-dollar bulbs.
On hand: 26 60-watt incandescents; two 40-watt decorative (for the bathroom); two three-way, 30/70/100; one CFL. (In use: three decorative; three three-way; three CFLs; two LEDs; the rest are incandescents, except for the floods outside.)
There was a stretch of about ten years roughly, 1973 to 1983 when the Everly Brothers were acting like perfect strangers to one another; legend has it that they exchanged not one word in that decade. (Possible exception: in 1975, at father Ike Everly’s funeral.)
Now Phil’s gone at 74; Don, two years older, is hanging on. While they’ll always be remembered as a duo, and were inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame as a unit, of the three biggest hits they had as songwriters they couldn’t tap Felice and Boudleaux Bryant forever Don wrote one (“Till I Kissed You”), Phil wrote one (“When Will I Be Loved”), and they wrote one together (“Cathy’s Clown”).
“When Will I Be Loved” has a weird history of its own. Left in the vault at Cadence Records after the Everlys moved to Warner Bros. in 1960, the success of “Cathy’s Clown” for WB (Number One!) led Cadence to dust off the year-old track and send it out. It made the Top Ten, and the B-side, a cover of Gene Vincent’s “Be-Bop-A-Lula,” picked up enough airplay to chart on its own. Now, of course, “When Will I Be Loved” is remembered as a Linda Ronstadt single, faster than the Everly original and with the verses shuffled. (The things you learn from karaoke.)
Anyway, given my penchant for live shows, or the appearance of live shows, beneath the jump you’ll find Don and Phil on Dick Clark’s Saturday-night show in 1960, singing over the backing track. (The audio goes wonky near the end.)
And here’s Taylor Swift coming out of Ralphs with her fifteen items or less all alone:
Time from seeing picture to coming up with title: 0.09 seconds.
Jamie Kitman, New York bureau chief of Automobile Magazine, writes in the February ’14 issue about the difficulty of being a left-of-center car buff:
Many of my more extreme fellow travelers on the left end of the dial disdain any interest in cars, much less full-blown habits like mine. Automobiles, they’ll tell you, are vulgar, polluting mechanical expressions of the will to power and male sexual insecurity, hence emblematic and highly beloved of the patriarchal, capitalist war machine.
“Well, duh!” I reply. But cars are useful, sometimes essential, and often a lot of fun.
Critics on the right brand me and my kind as freedom-suffocating communists, because we like cars but believe the law ought to require that air and water be clean, that cars be safe, and that manufacturers who break those rules or are found guilty of gross negligence in the design and manufacture of dangerous machinery and fuels ought to be held accountable.
The tricky part here is coming up with a definition of “safe” or, for that matter, of “gross negligence.”
Okay, there’s one thing trickier: finding a suitably female counterpart to some phallic sports job like Jaguar’s original E-Type.
Then again, in my neck of the woods, both men and women tend to drive humongous trucks or cars that try their darnedest to look like humongous trucks; there are, of course, parts of the country that find this practice somewhere between inscrutable and inflammatory.
Canadian author Sheila Heti has spoken (or tweeted, anyway) positively about Her, the Spike Jonze film about a fellow who falls hard for the disembodied voice in an operating system. I’ve been avoiding the film, officially because it hasn’t opened locally yet, but really because I know I’m susceptible to this same sort of crush and I’d just as soon not be reminded of myself, though of course I’ve never looked anything like Joaquin Phoenix.
Then she sent this up:
Sorry but there was no way to shorten this. pic.twitter.com/kLc9xze4Jl
— Sheila Heti (@sheilaheti) January 3, 2014
What did he mean by that? I suggested that this merited further thought, to the extent that what I do can be considered “thought,” and she replied:
by “this” I’m pretty sure he meant the scenario in the movie. Kill so many so only computers are left to love? Who knows?
It looks to me, down here in Third Hand Alley, that the chap really doesn’t want to kill anyone, but fears that the film might lead him or, perhaps more likely, someone else of a type he recognizes with a different set of values to bring about this binary dystopia. Then again, guys in love do some incredibly foolish things at times.
Once again, we have someone unclear on the concept:
Someone asked me a question on ask.fm and its pissing me off because i don’t know who it is.. I know how to find IP addresses and all but I don’t have a computer that can download programs ( I have an Acer C720 Chromebook and It only runs on Google Chrome software so..) I know how to find IP addresses but I need to know who this person is. I also know about the whole “block them and in a few days you’ll see the user” but I don’t want to wait and I don’t want to block anyone. Is there a way I can find out who the person is by only using Google Chrome?
It occurs to me that if you don’t want to be asked things, you probably shouldn’t be hanging around ask.fm, but maybe that’s just me.
And what are the chances that this character actually knows “how to find IP addresses,” or what to do with them once they’re found? I mean, if you consider this some sort of Vital Skill, it’s ludicrous in the extreme to confine yourself to a machine that you think won’t do it.
The worst of the car commercials are those for Lexus. This year they had one in which they showed a woman using a treadle sewing machine. They showed a quick close-up of her feet and she was wearing stiletto heels! I cheer the use of a treadle sewing machine but in those heels? Not happening sweetie.
Besides the implausibility of that little scene, it greatly annoys me that that style of ridiculous, uncomfortable and possibly even dangerous footwear is considered an essential part of the standard Attractive-Female Uniform. While it’s certainly not as extreme as the old Chinese custom of foot binding it comes from the same mindset.
I must give her props for consistency. I occasionally report on shoes in this space, and she happily denounces anything with a sufficiently high heel.
Girls, you can’t call yourselves modern, liberated women as long as you are slaves to fashion. It is hard to find shoes that are both comfortable and attractive but they do exist and if you buy them shoe designers will respond by making more. Do us all a favor and stop stuffing your feet into overpriced torture devices.
Not at all incidentally I am a firm believer in second opinions I brought up that same commercial to a friend yesterday at lunch. Her objection was different: “If you can afford a Lexus, you can afford an electric sewing machine.”
You 5’8 scruffy, glasses, wearing a blue hoodie outside the Vid and I asked you for a lighter. You lit my cigarette and we talked about our wishes for the new year. We heard the countdown starting and decided to stay outside. I started to cry and you kissed me, and then we started to make out. After a minute I felt something warm and realised that you pissed yourself. I pushed you away and that’s when you ran but I wish you had stayed. You peed on me but it’s OK! I just want to know who you are! Please reply and when you do tell me why I started crying so I know it’s you if you remember.
I shudder to imagine those two taking a shower together.
(Via Voodoo Princess Daintyhooves, aka Erin Palette.)
Two copies of this showed up yesterday, from the same source, less than 60 seconds apart:
Dentofacial and orthodontics orthopedics: facial or tooth deformities owing to intentional damage, accidents and also birth defects are treated by such specialist.
For further information, to see photos of the dog, and to follow the dog’s fate in the news, check out the October 17, 2012 Sacramento Bee article by Cynthia Hubert, “UC Davis vets have tough job treating snoutless dog. Pupils enrolled in an on-line program can teach in places like:.
No snout? How does it smell?
(I know, I know: “Terrible.”)
If ever you thought the Nets were snakebit, Tuesday night in San Antonio would have provided a valuable data point: with 24.2 seconds left, the Spurs, leading 113-92, decided not to shoot again, the shot-clock violation was duly called, and the Nets got possession for those last 0.2 seconds except that they’d already left for the locker room. Coach Jason Kidd had to call a timeout and go find some players for that last smidgen of time.
Kidd apparently made a point about time utilization, because tonight with 0.9 seconds left in the third quarter, Paul Pierce put up a lovely fadeaway from about 16 feet to bring the Nets to within 14 of the Thunder and then Deron Williams stole the ball from Jeremy Lamb and sank a trey at the horn. Nine seconds into the fourth, Williams, assisted by Andrei Kirilenko, dropped in a jumper. Seven points in ten seconds! Brooklyn kept pressing, and took a two-point lead with 2:01 left on, yes, a Williams trey. Oklahoma City tied it up at 93-all at 0:058; Joe Johnson got off a 20-footer at the buzzer to win it for Brooklyn, 95-93.
So how about those Nets? When they stay focused, they can win. They brought their mid-30s shooting up to 44 percent at the end. They pulled off 13 steals. And they did most of this without Kevin Garnett at Maximum Mean; KG took only four shots all night, making two. It didn’t hurt that Kevin Durant played most of the fourth quarter with five fouls, although KD’s line (24 points on 8-13 shooting) wasn’t too awful. Serge Ibaka logged another double-double, with 10 points and 11 rebounds. And here’s a first: Perry Jones III (!) led the bench with 11.
But there was just no stopping Deron Williams, who came up with a season-high 29 on a mere 17 shots. Paul Pierce bagged 18, and Alan Anderson topped the reserves with 13.
If nothing else, we’ve learned this from the last two games: you can’t let up in the fourth quarter. Will this lesson carry over to Saturday night in Minnesota? Beats me.
So now this is a thing:
Twee-Q, or Twitter Equality Quotient, is a simple score derived from how often you retweet men or women. We index the latest 100 tweets of a Twitter user and check the names and gender of those retweeted against our database (Swedish SCB, U.S Census 2010). Twee-Q is brought to you by Swedish organization Crossing Boarders, with support from Comviq. Crossing Boarders works to promote equal participation in associations, organizations and businesses. Based on successful experience from gender issues Crossing Borders has developed a practical guide that opens shut doors, introduces female role models and through robust methods, strengthens young women’s confidence and self-esteem. The goal is equal right to an active leisure.
The ideal Twee-Q, they say, is 10: your last 100 retweets were from 50 men and 50 women. On this basis, I rated an 8:
— Charles G Hill (@dustbury) January 1, 2014
I assure you, I wasn’t keeping count or anything, though if you’d asked me to guess, I wouldn’t have been too far off.
Note that had the proportions been reversed, the score would still have been 8, which is as it should be.
I was just about to type “Twenty-nine, of course” as an answer to this:
She (I assume it’s “she”) continues:
You know how they say that older men in their 40’s and 50’s, in general, prefere younger women for sex/relationships?
Well how much younger do they tend to prefere if they could have any?
If you were a man in your 40’s / 50’s and could have any age woman who was childless what age would be your ideal?
Or would it depend on whether you just wanted sex or a relationship?
Out of interes please state your age?
No longer being in my 40s/50s, I stopped typing. And despite being 60, I still have a memory, so I recalled once actually, more than once having pointed out before that someone 31 years my junior should not be on my romantic radar.
Someone did point out to the questioner the existence of the standard rule in such matters: “half your age plus seven.” I am not sure, however, if this applies equally to men and women; is a 50ish woman on solid social ground if she aims her sights on a chap of 32? At one level, I want to say “Of course she is, you moron,” but I have a feeling that she’d be skewered by society for so doing, while a guy robbing the cradle never comes close to getting probation.
All I dare give you is the description:
I assume this was approved by the estate of H. P. Lovecolt.