Once upon a time, there was a man named Randy K., so far as I know no relation to Tonio K. or anyone in Franz Kafka's entourage, and he was a man with one particularly quaint notion that online speech should be no less free than its printed cousin.
Then again, in the 1980s, "online speech" was something less than a buzzword; it was simply something that went on, low enough beneath the clouds to avoid detection by the radar of the national nannies and their media brethren. Randy called his discussion area "Controversial", and he wasn't kidding. When it went up on FidoNet's North American backbone, available to anyone with a link with a mail hub, the conference became almost instantly famous or, perhaps, infamous for the willingness of its moderator to entertain any ideas whatsoever, so long as they were, er, controversial enough.
(A technical note here: Unlike Usenet moderators, who pass judgment on all articles and permit only those which pass muster to enter their newsgroups, Fido moderators have essentially no power of prior restraint. The operator of a Fido system is responsible for all traffic that originates at his system, and should a user prove, in Fido parlance, "excessively annoying", the system operator is expected to take the appropriate steps at least something in Fido is relatively Usenet-like.)
Some time in the middle of 1989, Randy K. took a vacation, or a powder, or whatever, and was never seen again in the conference he had founded. It is a measure of how low a profile he kept that it was literally months before anyone noticed he was gone. About this time, Fido, for some arcane internal political reason, decided that there ought to be some minimal reporting requirements for moderators