Busted flush

Sarah Palin at Belmont ParkWith the notable exception of Andrew Sullivan, who presumably remains forever trapped in the womb, the goofier members of the leftosphere have now turned their attention, if that’s the word, to Sarah Palin’s rack, and whether it has been, um, artificially enhanced.

Now I admit to being easily flustered by discussions along these lines, but that should surprise no one, so I shall press ahead. My first thought, apart from “Oh, wow,” was that this would spark a call to tax those wicked breast implants, but the Senate already thought about that once, to the extent that anything the Senate does can be classified as “thought,” and it wound up on the cutting-room floor.

And then I happened on this musing by Stephen W. Browne, which started out as a contemplation of former Citibanker Debrahlee Lorenzana (previously described here), and which suggests to me that maybe it’s something else entirely:

At an American Studies Conference in Minsk, Belarus, I met an American woman, a clueless lefty academic. To give you an idea how clueless, at one point in a presentation she referred to the “bearded, Christlike figures of Che and Castro.” She didn’t even notice the cold wave that swept across the room from the Belarusians desperately praying for the fall of communism in their country.

At one point she touched on the theme of how “cultural imperialism” is spreading the “Caucasian ideal” of beauty across the world. (She was, by the way, not beautiful.)

This is, of course, not to say that there are absolutely no hotties on the left: have you seen Mrs Kucinich lately? Nor does everyone on that side of the aisle fall back so easily upon cliché; I know enough counterexamples to know better. I submit, though, that people who find their connection to the divine in the likes of Fidel Castro probably should not be trusted on matters of beauty.

8 comments

  1. ak4mc »

    10 June 2010 · 4:53 pm

    As I suggested over at RSM’s site, I think this is happening because, embarrassed by Andrew Sullivan’s somewhat lower fixation re: La Palin, some on the proggnut left are trying to, er, elevate the discussion.

  2. Lisa Paul »

    11 June 2010 · 1:09 am

    Sorry to spoil the party, but I’m seeing nothing here that couldn’t be explained by the difference between her campaign outfits and a t-shirt, a different choice of bras or perhaps a little weight gain. I read that she lost weight on the campaign trail and go more toward the dangerous side of slim. She seems a healthier weight now. So I’m saying, no implants.

  3. CGHill »

    11 June 2010 · 6:58 am

    I’ve looked at other shots from this event, and I’m inclined to agree with that assessment.

  4. Brett »

    11 June 2010 · 7:42 am

    I suspect that the party, spoiled or not, has only one name on its guestlist and so this vital question will remain the province of speculation only by most, and of serious speculation only by the profoundly unserious, such as the nitwits at Wankette who brought it up.

  5. Baby M »

    11 June 2010 · 3:16 pm

    Regarding the beautiful Mrs. Kucinich, she looks like Eowyn from the LOTR movies. Unfortunately, Rep. Kucinich looks more like Gollum than Faramir.

  6. Rule 5 Sunday : The Other McCain »

    20 June 2010 · 7:05 am

    […] VP candidate continues to be the all-purpose distraction for a failed Administration.American PowerDustburyProof PositiveAmerican Glob has the S.P. reply.Like Strands Through The Hourglass, So Are The Days. […]

  7. Nation of Cowards » Blog Archive » Rule 5: Katy Perry Celebrates the Anglosphere! »

    20 June 2010 · 12:21 pm

    […] wasn’t playing socker. * Haemet was concerned at the dearth of legal hotties. # American Power # Dustbury # Proof Positive # American Glob * Instapundit * Smash Mouth Politics * Power Line * Left Coast […]

  8. It’s the Speculators, Tweedy! »

    21 June 2010 · 9:03 am

    […] Dustbury   Proof Positive   American Glob […]

RSS feed for comments on this post