Making it up as I go along

I have never had any particular gift for fiction: I run out of gas somewhere around a thousand words, and if you believe the old yarn about there being only seven basic plots, you’d probably wonder if I’d ever seen the other six. Clearly I have no business trying to write a novel.

Stacy McCain also declines to participate, for the following reason:

One reason I’ve never tried to write a novel is because, sooner or later, you’ve got to have a sex scene. There’s this gnawing fear that (a) the scene would be interpreted as the writer’s own personal fantasy or a roman à clef and (b) the results might be ridiculous.

There is no shortage of examples of (c) all of the above, either.

Then again, maybe it’s just imagination I lack. Cintra Wilson has an article in the current Out about a couple of straight females writing gay romance novels. Yes, there are sex scenes. Says one of the authors in question:

I hope she wasn’t too disappointed to be sent to write an article about writers of gay porn for women and come across me instead. I hope she believed me when I said that that was not what I thought I was doing, and that one or two sex scenes in a book full of other stuff does not automatically make that book porn.

I suppose this is where I’m supposed to insist that “I am not a prude,” despite the fact that I tend to get a trifle antsy during sex scenes, even of the sort George Carlin once described as “good old-fashioned American man-on-top get-it-over-with-quick.” Besides, there are probably a hundred contemporary synonyms for “penis,” and 98 of them tend to make me giggle. (I blame Mike Judge.) I should definitely steer clear of those M/M stories.

4 comments

  1. Andrea Harris »

    17 August 2010 · 12:42 pm

    “One reason I’ve never tried to write a novel is because, sooner or later, you’ve got to have a sex scene.”

    Um. No you don’t. Writers of previous eras to our current sex-obsessed one managed to write countless novels with nary an embrace between hero and heroine. And that’s if the novel in question featured couplings at all.

  2. smitty »

    17 August 2010 · 1:40 pm

    My thinking is that you have to include sexuality, as it’s part of the human condition.
    However, well-written characters can leave the grungy bits off-stage.
    Just hand the reader enough pieces and let them build their own sex scene to taste.

  3. ak4mc »

    17 August 2010 · 2:08 pm

    I think Paul Simon was onto something.

    If you took all the girls I knew when I was single
    Brought them all together for one night
    You know it would never match my sweet imagination

    Today’s novelists could learn from that.

  4. KingShamus »

    17 August 2010 · 2:24 pm

    Skull cinema is often far more interesting than if you just lay out every sordid detail for the reader right out on the page.

RSS feed for comments on this post