Market pricing and then some

Austin, Texas has the perhaps-dubious distinction of being the largest city in the nation served by only a single Interstate. Loop 1 — the MoPac — runs more or less parallel to I-35, a few miles to the west, and it becomes a toll road north of Parmer Lane. TxDOT’s latest idea to relieve congestion on the MoPac is to add two lanes to the existing six between Parmer and the river, a distance of about 11 miles, which will have variable tolls, and I do mean “variable”:

[T]he added northbound and southbound lanes would be open only to those willing to pay a toll, to transit buses, to registered van pools and to emergency vehicles.

But the real departure would be the nature of the tolls themselves, which would change minute by minute depending on the level of traffic in the lane. The point … would be to keep the toll at a level calibrated to keep speeds in the lane at 50 mph or more.

If traffic gets too thick and traffic begins to slow, the toll would instantly increase in an effort to discourage some people from choosing to use the express lane. Signs well upstream of the express lane entrances would alert people to the current toll rate.

Since traffic on MoPac is occasionally moving a lot slower than 50 mph — sometimes it’s not moving at all — people might be willing to pay quite a bit to get up some speed. Chris Bradford thinks it’s a swell idea:

This is how we ought to add new capacity. It will make everyone better off. The people who choose to pay the toll will be better off because they value the time savings more than the cost of the toll. Bus commuters will be better off — they might be the biggest beneficiaries, in fact — because they will get a suddenly much shorter commute for (I presume) the same bus fare. Drivers who continue to use the free lanes will endure slightly less congestion, even if it’s just a narrower period of peak congestion. Finally, taxpayers, if not better off, will be no worse off because they won’t have to pay for the extra capacity. The capacity will be paid by those who value and use it.

How much would this toll be?

Wilbur Smith Associates, which has been doing traffic and revenue studies on the project for the [Central Texas Regional] Mobility Authority, has indicated to officials that the project would be financially feasible with a top rate initially of $2.57 in 2011 dollars. Since the road wouldn’t open until 2016, that would equate to about $3 on opening day. Officials emphasized that the actual toll rates have not been set yet and that Wilbur Smith later will produce a more rigorous “investment-grade” study.

During periods of low or no congestion — I am told that such exist — the toll might be as low as 50 cents.

So drivers will be faced with a choice. Bradford explains:

[T]he congestion cost each driver imposes on his fellow drivers will be approximately equal to the price of driving in the congestion-free lane. That’s one of the quirks of the economics of congestion — it turns out that the cost of congestion a driver imposes is equal to the congestion-clearing price.

Which seems counterintuitive, but it seems to work in real life.


  1. no »

    7 February 2012 · 8:37 pm

    Horse feathers. Taxpayers all paid to build the roads, now they want to treat some taxpayers more equal than others. Widen the damn road(s). I say this as a former resident of NW Austin. Whomever designed the roads in that city must have been retarded–there are no East-West throughways!

    I live in Seattle now and the liberal illogic dictates that there must be HOV lanes on the Interstate in King County. This means that 25% of the roads are unavailable to the vast majority of drivers and the denizens of the far left lanes clog up the rest of the lanes when they decide to move rightwards towards their onramps–when they are less than a mile away. Hence, every off ramp just slows all of the traffic down. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

    Much better would be a dedicated express lane which is walled off every 10 miles or so meaning no one can get in or out until they get to downtown Seattle.

  2. CGHill »

    7 February 2012 · 9:16 pm

    Well, if they ever finish SH 45, they’ll at least have something resembling a loop/beltway/whatever.

    I-35 through central Austin, you’ll recall, is double-decked, the top being something vaguely express-like. Unfortunately, everyone I need to see in town is accessible only through the lower lanes.

  3. Roger Green »

    8 February 2012 · 5:17 am

    Around Atanta, they keep widening the road, so now you have 8-, 10-, even 12-lane highways, with yahoos moving from lane 3 to the exit ramp. And STILL it’s congested. Some sort of plan would definitely be in order to limit the number of cars rather than build more highways, especially when gas will be $5 a gallon by EOY.

RSS feed for comments on this post