Don’t know much about science books

This ran in a couple of state papers earlier this month:

In a state-by-state review, the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a think tank based in Washington, D.C., found science education standards in most states are “mediocre to awful, placing America’s national competitiveness, technological prowess and scientific leadership in grave jeopardy.”

Oklahoma was one of 10 states that received an F, while 17 states received a D and 11 states got a C.

If Oklahoma gets an F, the federal government should get a whole F-load of F’s:

We have a real serious need for proper scientific education in the Western World. The lack of understanding goes all the way to the top, leading to such things as the banning of the harmless incandescent light bulb as a frankly superstitious gesture towards the problem of overuse of energy. Banning the light bulb does fuckall to save large amounts of energy — it’s like watering a petunia in your front yard while your house is burning. But the scientific ignoramuses we keep voting into the government were fooled into doing this and now if I want to buy 100-watt incandescent bulbs I have to order them over the internet from Germany.

And furthermore:

You can’t teach kids science without teaching them the scientific method and it seems as though both sides of the partisan divide are bound-and-determined to make sure their kids don’t learn it.

Which is, of course, job security for the ignoramuses.


  1. Transterrestrial Musings - The Climate Fraud »

    21 February 2012 · 11:48 am

    […] Related: Don’t know much about science books. […]

  2. lighthouse »

    22 February 2012 · 9:58 am

    Well, certainly right about the pointlessness of the Light Bulb ban

    A fraction of 1% of overall energy usage saved, on official Dept of Energy stats etc as referenced….
    with more about all the unpublicised deception behind banning light bulbs

RSS feed for comments on this post