And here he is

Gunner, first photoFirst shot of Gunner, born on the 28th of March. Still has that rich tomato-ey glow. (Runs in the family, I think.) Personally, I think Alicia and Russ were trying to save some money on birthday parties, since Laney’s the 29th of March and Gunner’s the 28th. (That’s my story, and I’m sticking to it as long as I think I can get away with it.) Oh, and don’t even think about calling him “Gunsy.” (Addendum: I really think they’re going to quit after three, but then I really thought they were going to quit after two, so pay no attention to me.) (Further addendum: For some reason, I decided that this picture would look better somewhere other than hung off the right edge of the page, so I moved it in. Wouldn’t be the first time I made some dubious aesthetic judgment.)


  1. Diane »

    5 April 2007 · 7:11 am

    LOL @ that rich tomato-ey glow.

    That’s one fine looking baby!

  2. wamprat »

    5 April 2007 · 1:18 pm

    He’s adorable; how many more?

  3. CGHill »

    5 April 2007 · 8:45 pm

    It’s not up to me. (I’ve told my kids how this happens; they pay me no heed.)

  4. Jennifer »

    6 April 2007 · 2:10 pm

    Awwwwwwwwwww! Tomato-ey glow and all, he’s a pinchable little guy!

  5. Veronica »

    7 April 2007 · 3:41 pm

    Heh. He’s cute!

  6. Joseph Hertzlinger »

    7 April 2007 · 11:56 pm

    Mr. Tomatohead?

RSS feed for comments on this post