Sort of an April/May romance

There being a pertinent case in play — one’s 18, one’s 14Robert Stacy McCain offers this quote from the authorities:

“The idea is to protect people in that vulnerable group from people who are older, 18 and above,” said Bruce Colton, state attorney for Florida’s 19th circuit, which includes Indian River County and other parts of the Treasure Coast. “The statute specifically says that consent is not a defense.”

Colton said … this case exemplifies the purpose of the current law and added he would not support any effort to make consensual relationships among peers legal.

“There’s a big maturity difference between them,” he said. “You’re talking the difference between a senior in high school and a freshman in high school. That’s what the law is designed to protect.”

While I appreciate Mr Colton’s concern, I must note for the historical record that when I was a senior in high school, I was no more mature than the frosh.

(Then again, nothing happened. Nothing that violates any laws of Florida or, um, of South Carolina, anyway.)

5 comments

  1. Dick Stanley »

    23 May 2013 · 5:46 pm

    Jail bait has always been jail bait, like it or not.

  2. CGHill »

    23 May 2013 · 6:17 pm

    Yea, verily. And I don’t think it’s wise to mess around with that particular scheme, either.

  3. Bill Peschel »

    24 May 2013 · 6:44 am

    Thus the downside of having sex in a high school toilet. Whatever happened to the back seat of cars?

  4. CGHill »

    24 May 2013 · 7:01 am

    Center belts and baby seats.

  5. FMJRA 2.0: Memorial Day Delayed Edition : The Other McCain »

    27 May 2013 · 11:23 am

    […] Dustbury […]

RSS feed for comments on this post