There is no shortage of terrible credit-card offers out there, and if you were reading this site way back in 2002, you may have seen a reference to a deal offered by First Premier Bank of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, which struck me as something less than wonderful. Said I at the time:

The terms for this card range from not too bad (18.9 percent APR, 25-day grace period on new purchases) to stiff ($50 annual fee) to preposterous ($119 “acceptance fee”, $72 annual “participation fee” over and above the $50).

As it happens, they’ve sent me their latest offer, and it has improved in one regard: the grace period on new purchases is now 27 days. However, the annual fee has gone to $175 for the first year, $49 thereafter, and there’s a “monthly servicing fee” of $14.50, which, they are careful to spell out, is $174 a year. And the APR? Thirty-six percent.

I’ll give them this much: none of this is in Extremely Tiny Print, and everything I’ve mentioned is explained when necessary. Still, nothing moves me to accept this “pre-approved” account.


  1. JT »

    1 November 2015 · 10:22 am

    I thought I was joking when I told a joke about a Mafia Mastercard (87% interest compounded instantly).

  2. Bill Peschel »

    1 November 2015 · 10:49 am

    I wouldn’t grant them even that much credit. Wasn’t that the result of a consumer law recently passed that forced them to disclose their terms that way?

  3. CGHill »

    1 November 2015 · 10:54 am

    To some extent, yes. But there are still ways to obscure stuff while adhering to the letter of the law, a few of which I’ve seen of late: sticking it in the middle of a separate booklet instead of at the beginning seems to be fairly popular these days.

    It may be the equivalent of a syndrome one often sees on the highway: nobody drives more slowly than the guy who just got a ticket.

  4. Georganna Hancock (@GLHancock) »

    1 November 2015 · 11:11 am

    Love the variety in bank notifications: Chase/Amazon sent large print 3-page chart; Citi sent 16 pages of single-spaced text. Both said the same things (law allows them to jack up rates) but Citi said changes were due to customer requests! Yeah, never!

RSS feed for comments on this post