Points on the curve

Morgan Freeberg brought this up over on Facebook:

What are the bust/waist/hip measurements of a REALLY hot chick … in metric??

You don’t know, do you…

I can give them to you in inches, and you can instantly envision the shape … if it’s Raquel, or Marilyn, or Twiggy, or Kate Upton or Kate Moss. If we repeat the exercise in centimeters you haven’t a clue. Even if you’re one of these “dead parrot skit” crunchy-frog surrender-monkey Eiffel-Tower-dwelling Metric System advocates…

You can’t pop a woody to centimeters. It’s just a fact.

“Ninety-one, sixty-one, ninety-one? Maybe — if she’s 1.60 meters.” — Not necessarily Sir Mix-A-Lot.

At any rate, I wouldn’t expect any conversion factors from the late General Johnson:

And for this film, you’re on your own:

(If you need help, I reviewed it here.)





4 comments

  1. McG »

    17 August 2017 · 11:39 am

    Crunchy-frog surrender-monkey Eiffel-Tower-dwelling Metric System advocates are the European precursors to Pajama Boy, so popping woodies wouldn’t be in their wheelhouse anyway.

  2. Mike aka Proof »

    17 August 2017 · 2:40 pm

    If God had wanted us to use Metric, He would not have created the barleycorn.

  3. ETat »

    17 August 2017 · 6:05 pm

    I imagine the same sentiment (in reverse, cm->inches) declared by those monkey-frogs…eiffel-tower-dwellers, east+west’ euros, whatever.
    “How can you imagine Sofia, Linda, etc – in those godawful inches? 90-60-90 is a golden standard easy to picture, easy to remember!”

  4. nightfly »

    18 August 2017 · 1:31 pm

    “Oui, she is… how you say? … a breek hooouuuuse.”

RSS feed for comments on this post